Grave spaces within Yoruba (Nigeria) societies are not just ordinary symbols, and they constitute “other place” used to meet individuals’ physical and social needs. This study examined how residential grave spaces within Yoruba social structure are used by them in meeting their day-to-day needs. Drawing from symbolic interactionism theory, and data gathered from Ekiti-Yoruba culture, this study investigates how community members define and utilize the place of graves from traditional to modern society in meeting their needs. Findings revealed that during the precolonial society, grave spaces served religious and endearment purposes. While still retaining these functions in modern era, the functions have increased to security, protections, and power play due to the hurdles posed by modernity. The article concluded that the practice may continue in spite of its opposition by policy makers and orthodox faiths.
AshmoreW.GellerP. L. (2005). Social dimensions of mortuary space. In RakitaGordon F. M.BuikstraJane E.BeckLane A.WilliamsSloan R. (Eds.), Interacting with the dead: Perspectives on mortuary archaeology for the new millennium. (pp. 81–92).
Gainesville:
University Press of Florida.
CharonJ. M. (1998). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration. 6th ed.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
5.
CoeM. (1988). Ideology of the Maya tomb. In BensonE.GriffinG. (Eds.), Maya iconography (pp. 222–235).
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
6.
DouglasK. E. (2013).
Current state of public cemeteries in Rivers state.The Nigerian Health Journal,
13, 58–61.
7.
Evans-PritchardE. E. (1949).
Burial and mortuary rites of the Nuer. African Affairs,
48, 62.
8.
FlorenceR. (1997). New Orleans cemeteries: Life in the cities of the dead.
New Orleans, LA:
Batture Press.
9.
FoucaultM. (1984). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias (J. Miskowiec , Trans.). Architecture/Mouvement/Continuite, 5(1), 1–9.
10.
FrancavigliaR. V. (1971).
The cemetery as an evolving cultural landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,
61(3), 501–509.
11.
GennepA. V. (1960). Rites of passage.
London, England:
Routledge.
12.
GillespieS. D. (2003). Body and soul among the Maya: Keeping the spirits in place.
Gainesville:
University of Florida.
13.
HetheringtonK. (1997). The badlands of modernity: Heterotopia and social ordering.
Abingdon, England:
Routledge.
14.
HoltN.SparkesA. (2001).
An ethnographic study of cohesiveness in a college soccer team over a season. The Sport Psychologist,
15, 237–259.
15.
JimohS. A. (1985).
Nigerian’s concept of death and its implications for counselling in Nigeria. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling,
8, 75–83.
16.
KanS. (1989). Symbolic immortality: The Tlingit Potlatch of the nineteenth century.
Washington, DC:
Smithsonian Institution Press.
17.
LeeR.VaughanM. (2008).
Death and dying in the history of Africa since 1800. Journal of African History,
49, 341–359.
18.
LoflandJ. (2002). Analytic ethnography: Features, failings, and futures. In HubermanA. M.Miles, B.M. (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 137–170).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
19.
MalinowskiB. (1948). Magic, science and religion and other essays.
Boston, MA:
Beacon Press.
20.
McAnanyP. (1995). Living with the ancestors: Kinship and kingship in ancient Maya society.
Austin:
University of Texas Press.
21.
Meltzer, B. N., Petras, J. W., Reynolds, L. T. (1975). Symbolic Interactionism: Genesis, Varieties and Criticism. London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
22.
MillerD. S.RiveraJ. D. (2006).
Hallowed ground, place, and culture: The cemetery and the creation of place.Space and Culture,
9, 334.
23.
OnwuzuruigboI. (2014).
Space of power and power of space Islam and conflict over cemetery space in colonial Ibadan. Journal of Urban History,
40(2), 301–317.
24.
ParkerI. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research.
Berkshire, England:
Open University Press.
25.
Parker PearsonM. (1999). The archaeology of death and burial.
College Station:
Texas A&M University Press.
26.
PearsonM. P. (1982). Mortuary practices, society and ideology: An ethno archeological study. In HodderI. (Ed.), Symbolic and structural archeology (pp 99–113).
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
27.
Ritzer G. (2011). Sociological Theory. NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
28.
SaldanhaA. (2008).
Heterotopia and structuralism. Environment and Planning A,
40(9), 2080–2096.
29.
SchneeklothL. H.ShibleyR. G. (1995). Place making: The art and practice of building communities.
New York, NY:
John Wiley.
30.
WolcottH. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing.
London, England:
Altamira Press.
