Research indicates that people maintain a connection with deceased loved ones, which can be healthy for the bereaved individuals. To maintain these bonds, people readily admit to communicating with the deceased. Although communication with the deceased shares similarities with traditional models of interpersonal communication, it is distinctly different. Interviews with 20 individuals revealed support for a model of transcorporeal communication, communication to people who do not maintain a physical presence. This communication includes the components of sender, inner representation of the deceased as receiver, message, feedback based on what the sender believes the deceased would say, and a metaphysical element. Implications of transcorporeal communication for griefwork are also discussed.
AttigT. (1996) How we grieve: Relearning the world, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AttigT. (2001) Relearning the world: Making and finding meanings. In: NeimeyerR. A. (ed.) Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 33–53.
3.
BarkerL. L.WisemanG. (1966) A model of intrapersonal communication. Journal of Communication16: 172–179. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00031.x.
4.
BarnlundD. C. (1970) A transactional model of communication. In: SerenoK. K.MortensenC. D. (eds) Foundations of communication theory, New York, NY: Harper, pp. 83–102.
5.
BiernackiP.WaldorfD. (1981) Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research10(2): 141–163. doi:10.1177/004912418101000205.
6.
Brubaker, J. R., & Hayes, G. R. (2011). We will never forget you [online]: An empirical investigation of post-mortem myspace comments. Paper presented at Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China. doi:10.1145/1958824.1958843.
7.
DavisC. G.Nolen-HoeksemaS.LarsonJ. (1998) Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: Two constructs of meaning. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology75: 561–574. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.561.
8.
de VriesB. (2001) Grief: Intimacy’s reflection. Generations25(2): 75–80.
9.
DeGroot, J. M. (2009). Reconnecting with the dead via Facebook: Examining transcorporeal communication as a way to maintain relationships (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT No. 3371475).
10.
DeGrootJ. M. (2012) Maintaining relational continuity with the deceased on Facebook. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying65(3): 195–212. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/OM.65.3.c.
11.
EgnotoM. J.SiriannaJ. M.OrtegaC. R.StefanoneM. (2014) Death on the digital landscape: A preliminary investigation into the grief process and motivations behind participation in the online memoriam. OMEGA: Journal of Death and Dying69(3): 283–304. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/OM.69.3.d.
12.
Fairbairn, W. D. (1952). An object relations theory of the personality. New York: Basic Books.
13.
FieldN. P.Gal-OzE.BonannoG. A. (2003) Continuing bonds and adjustment at 5 years after the death of a spouse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology71(1): 110–117. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.71.1.110.
14.
FieldN. P.NicholsC.HolenA.HorowitzM. J. (1999) The relation of continuing attachment to adjustment in conjugal bereavement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology67: 212–218. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.212.
15.
GlickI. O.WeissR. S.ParkesC. M. (1974) The first year of bereavement, New York, NY: John Wiley, Interscience.
16.
HallamE.HockeyJ.HowarthG. (1999) Beyond the body: Death and social identity, London, England: Routledge.
17.
HastingsS. O.HooverJ. D.MusambiraG. W. (2005) In my heart for eternity: Normalizing messages to the deceased. Storytelling, Self, Society1(2): 11–25. doi:10.1080/15505340509490263.
18.
HoferM. A. (1984) Relationships as regulators: A psychobiologic perspective on bereavement. Psychosomatic Medicine46: 183–197.
19.
HoneycuttJ. M. (2010) Introduction. In: HoneycuttJ. M. (ed.) Imagine that: Studies in imagined interaction, Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc, pp. 1–14.
20.
HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S.EdwardsR. (1989) Intrapersonal communication, social cognition, and imagined interactions. In: RobertsC. V.WatsonK. W. (eds) Intrapersonal communication processes, Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, pp. 166–184.
21.
JacksonE. N. (1957) Understanding grief: Its roots, dynamics, and treatment, New York, NY: Abingdon Press.
22.
KlassD. (1993) Solace and immortality: Bereaved parents’ continuing bond with their children. Death Studies17(4): 343–368. doi:10.1080/07481189308252630.
23.
Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
24.
KlassD.WalterT. (2001) Processes of grieving: How bonds are continued. In: StroebeM. S.HanssonR. O.StroebeW.SchutH. (eds) Handbook of bereavement research, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 431–448.
25.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
MarwitS. J.KlassD. (1994/1995) Grief and the role of the inner representation of the deceased. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying30(4): 283–298. doi:10.2190/PEAA-P5AK-L6T8-5700.
27.
MitchellM. (2007) Constructing immortality: The role of the dead in everyday life. In: MitchellM. (ed.) Remember me, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–18.
28.
ParkesC. M. (1970) Seeking and finding a lost object: Evidence from recent studies of reaction to bereavement. Social Science and Medicine4: 187–201.
29.
PenningtonN. (2013) You don’t de-friend the dead: An analysis of grief communication by college students through Facebook profiles. Death Studies37: 617–635. doi:10.1080/07481187.2012673536.
30.
RandoT. A. (1986) Parental loss of a child, Champaign, IL: Research Press.
31.
RandoT. A. (1992) The increasing prevalence of complicated mourning: The onslaught is just the beginning. OMEGA: Journal of Death and Dying26(1): 43–59. doi:10.2190/7MDL-RJTF-NA2D-NPQF.
32.
RaphaelB. (1983) The anatomy of bereavement, New York, NY: Basic Books.
RubinS. S. (1985) The resolution of bereavement: A clinical focus on the relationship to the deceased. Psychotherapy22(2): 231–235. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0085499.
35.
SchrammW. (1954) The process and effects of mass communication, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
36.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
37.
ShuchterS. R.ZisookS. (1993) The course of normal grief. In: StroebeM. S.StroebeW.HanssonR. O. (eds) Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research, and intervention, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–111.
38.
SilvermanP.KlassD. (1996) Introduction: What’s the problem? In: KlassD.SilvermanP.NickmanS. (eds) Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press, pp. 73–86.
39.
StroebeM.SchutH. (1999) The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies23: 197–224. doi:10.1080/074811899201046.
40.
WeissR. S. (1993) Loss and recovery. In: StroebeM. S.StroebeW.HanssonR. O. (eds) Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research, and intervention, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–111.
