The essay makes the case that continuing bonds is a useful perspective for bereavement studies based in existential, phenomenological, and cultural philosophy. First, the idea of continuing bonds has explanatory power for many phenomena in individual and family grief and in the multiple interactions between individual/family grief and larger social/cultural dynamics. Second, in the study of continuing bonds we find concepts that are akin to those in phenomenology and existentialism. Using some of my own scholarship and the scholarship of many others, the essay is structured by themes Edith Marie Steffen and I found in our 2018 anthology on developments in the continuing bonds model in the two decades after it was introduced: Continuing bonds (1) are inter-subjective, (2) are central in constructing meaning, (3) raise questions about the ontological status of our interactions with the dead, and (4) are best understood within their cultural setting.
AttigT. (1996). How we grieve: Relearning the world. Oxford University Press.
2.
BorkmanT. (1976). Experiential knowledge: A new concept for the analysis of self-help groups. Social Service Review, 50(3), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1086/643401
3.
BraudeA. (1989). Radical spirits: Spiritualism and women’s rights in nineteenth-century America. Beacon Press.
4.
BreenL. J.KawashimaD.JoyK.CadellS.RothD.ChowA.MacdonaldM. E. (2020). Grief literacy: A call to action for compassionate communities. Death Studies, 46(2), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1739780
ConnertonP. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge University Press.
7.
DarwinC. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. D. Appleton and Company. Darwin Online. http://darwin-online.org.uk/
8.
DesmondA.MooreJ. (2009). Darwin’s sacred cause: How a hatred of slavery shaped Darwin’s views on human evolution. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
9.
De WaalF. (2009). The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. Three Rivers Press.
10.
De WaalF. (2013). The bonobo and the atheist: In search of humanism among the primates. WW. Norton.
11.
DuschinskyR.GrecoM.SolomonJ. (2015). The politics of attachment: Lines of flight with Bowlby, Deleuze and Guattari. Theory, Culture and Society, 32(7-8), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415605577
EvansR.Ribbens McCarthyJ.KébéF.BowlbyS.WouangoJ. (2017). Interpreting ‘grief’ in Senegal: Language, emotions and cross-cultural translation in a francophone African context. Mortality, 22(2), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2017.1291602
14.
FieldN. P.FilanoskyC. (2009). Continuing bonds, risk factors for complicated grief, and adjustment to bereavement. Death Studies, 34(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180903372269
15.
FieldN. P.GaoB.PadernaL. (2005). Continuing bonds in bereavement: An attachment theory based perspective. Death Studies, 29(4), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180590923689
16.
FoucaultM.KhalfaJ.MurphyJ. (2006). The history of madness. Routledge.
17.
FreudS. (1961). Mourning and melancholia. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (vol. 14, pp. 243–258). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1917).
GossR.KlassD. (2005). Dead but not lost: Grief narratives in religious traditions. AltaMira.
20.
GranekL. (2010). Grief as pathology: The evolution of grief theory in psychology from Freud to the present. History of Psychology, 13(1), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016991
21.
GranekL. (2013). Disciplinary wounds: Has grief become the identified patient for a field gone awry?Journal of Loss & Trauma, 18(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2012.688708
22.
HamabataM. M. (1990). Crested kimono: Power and love in the Japanese business family. Cornell University Press.
23.
HoS. M. Y.ChanI. S. F. (2017). Externalized and internalized continuing bonds in understanding grief. In KlassD.SteffenE. M. (Eds.), Continuing bonds in bereavement: New directions for research and practice (pp. 129–138). Routledge.
24.
HortonP. C. (1981). Solace, the missing dimension in psychiatry. University of Chicago Press.
25.
HublerE. (1952). The sense of Shakespeare’s sonnets. Princeton University Press.
26.
InallY.LillieM. (2018). Remember me: Deep in time: Meaning and mnemonic, in archaeological studies of death. Remember me project. University of Hull.
27.
KellhearA. (2013). Compassionate communities: End-of-life care as everyone’s responsibility. QJM: International Journal of Medicine, 106(12), 1071–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hct200
28.
KeteM. L. (2000). Sentimental collaborations: Mourning and middle-class identity in nineteenth-century America. Duke University Press.
29.
KlassD. (1988). Parental grief: Solace and resolution. Springer Publishing Company.
30.
KlassD. (1993). The inner representation of the dead child and the worldviews of bereaved parents. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 26(4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.2190/GEYM-BQWN-9N98-23Y5
31.
KlassD. (1997). The deceased child in the psychic and social worlds of bereaved parents during the resolution of grief. Death Studies, 21(2), 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811897202056
32.
KlassD. (1999). Spiritual lives of bereaved parents. Brunner/Mazel.
KlassD. (2014). Grief, consolation, and religions: A conceptual framework. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 69(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.69.1.a
35.
KlassD.ShinnersB. (1983). Professional roles in self-help groups for the bereaved. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 13(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.2190/VE7L-7ULX-CR86-50U2
36.
KlassD.SteffenE. M. (2018). Continuing bonds in bereavement: New directions for research and practice. Routledge.
KøsterA.KofodE. H. (Eds.). (2022). Cultural, existential and phenomenological dimensions of grief experience. Routledge.
39.
LaqueurT. W. (2015). The work of the dead: A cultural history of mortal remains. Princeton University Press.
40.
LindemannE. (1994). Symptomatology and management of acute grief. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(6), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.151.6.155
41.
LiuT.-H.FieldN. P. (2019). Continuing bonds and dreams following violent loss among Cambodian survivors of the Pol Pot era. Death Studies, 46(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1699202
MannheimK. (1936). Ideology and utopia. Routledge.
44.
MarwitS. J.KlassD. (1995). Grief and the role of the inner representation of the deceased. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 30(4), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.2190/PEAA-P5AK-L6T8-5700
45.
McCarthyJ. R.EvansR.BowlbyS.WouangomJ. (2018). Making sense of family deaths in urban Senegal: Diversities, contexts, and comparisons. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 82(2), 230–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222818805351
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
48.
MoranS. (2014). What does “1/2” an intelligence mean? In GardnerH.WinnerE.KornhaberM. (Eds.), Mind, work, and life: A festschrift for howard gardner (vol. 2, pp. 168–200). Offices of Howard Gardner.
49.
MoranS. (2019). Is personal life purpose replacing shared worldview as youths increasingly individuate?Research: Ideas for Today’s Investors, 18(5), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijler.18.5.2
50.
NeimeyerR. A.KlassD.DennisM. R. (2014). A social constructionist account of grief: Loss and the narration of meaning. Death Studies, 38(8), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2014.913454
PowdermakerH. (1966). Stranger and friend: The way of an anthropologist. W. W. Norton.
54.
RatcliffeM. (2020). Sensed presence without sensory qualities: A phenomenological study of bereavement hallucinations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09666-2
55.
RichesG.DawsonP. (1996). Communities of feeling: The culture of bereaved parents. Mortality, 1(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/713685832
56.
RizzutoA. M. (1982). The father and the child’s representation of god: A developmental approach. In CuthS. H.GurwittA. R.RossJ. M. (Eds.), Father and child: Developmental and clinical perspectives (pp. 357–607). Routledge.
ScruttonA. P. (2018). Grief, ritual and belief. A philosophical perspective. In KlassD.SteffenE. M. (Eds.), Continuing bonds in bereavement: New directions for research and practice (pp. 214–226). Routledge.
59.
SeiwertH. (2016). Ancestor worship and state rituals in contemporary China: Fading boundaries between religious and secular. Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft, 24(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfr-2016-0013
60.
SilvermanG. S.BaroillerA.HemerS. R. (2021). Culture and grief: Ethnographic perspectives on ritual, relationships and remembering. Death Studies, 45(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1851885
61.
SzaszT. (1961). The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. Harper and Row.
