Research on religion and death anxiety has produced many contradictory findings. These conflicting findings arise, in part, from inadequacies in the measurement of religion as well as problems with the way the data have been analyzed. The purpose of the current study is to develop and empirically evaluate a conceptual model that contains the following core hypotheses: (a) People who go to church more often will receive more spiritual support from fellow church members (spiritual support is assistance provided by coreligionists for the explicit purpose of increasing the religious beliefs and practices of the recipient). (b) Individuals who receive more spiritual support will be more likely to trust God. (c) Those who trust God more deeply will be more likely to feel forgiven by Him. (d) People who feel forgiven by God will experience less death anxiety. Findings from a recent nationwide survey provide support for each hypothesis.
AlwinD. (1988) Structural equation modeling in research on human development and aging. In: SchaieK. W.CampbellR. T.MeredithW.RawlinngsS. C. (eds) Methodological issues in aging research, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 71–170.
2.
ArdeltM.KoenigC. S. (2006) The role of religion for hospice patients and relatively healthy older adults. Research on Aging28: 184–215.
3.
BaldwinJ. M. (1902) Fragments in philosophy and science of being: Collected essays and addresses, New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
4.
BarnaG. (2002) The state of the church 2002, Ventura, CA: Issachar Resources.
5.
BergerP. L. (1967) The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory, New York, NY: Doubleday.
6.
CicirelliV. G. (2002) Fear of death among older adults: Predictions from Terror Management Theory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences57B: P358–P366.
7.
DeShonR. P. (1998) A cautionary note on measurement error correlations in structural equation models. Psychological Methods3: 412–423.
EllisL.WahabE. A. (2013) Religiosity and fear of death: A theory-oriented review of the empirical literature. Review of Religious Research55: 149–189.
10.
EndersC. C. (2010) Applied missing data analysis, New York, NY: Guilford.
11.
Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group (1999) Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research, Kalamazoo, MI: John E. Fetzer Institute.
12.
FeifelH. (1959) The meaning of death, New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
13.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18: 39–50.
14.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ. (2010) Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals to moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review14: 140–150.
15.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS. (1986) The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In: BaumeisterR. F. (ed.) Public self and private self, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 189–212.
16.
GreenbergJ.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT. (1997) Terror Management Theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology29: 61–139.
17.
HoelterJ. W. (1979) Multidimensional treatment of fear of death. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology47: 996–999.
18.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999) Cutoff points for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Psychological Methods1: 130–149.
19.
JoreskogK. G. (1969) A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika34: 183–202.
20.
KirkpatrickL. A. (2005) Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion, New York, NY: Guilford.
21.
KrauseN. (2002a) Church-based social support and health in old age: Exploring variations by race. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences57B: S332–S347.
22.
KrauseN. (2002b) A comprehensive strategy for developing closed-ended survey items for use in studies of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences57B: S263–S274.
23.
Krause, N. (2008). Aging in the church. How social relationships affect health. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
24.
KrauseN.BastidaE. (2012) Contact with the dead, religion, and death anxiety among older Mexican Americans. Death Studies36: 932–948.
25.
KrauseN.HaywardR. D. (2013) Acts of contrition, forgiveness by God, and death anxiety among older Mexican Americans. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion25: 57–73.
26.
LinA. H. (2003) Factors related to attitudes toward death among American and Chinese older adults. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying47: 3–23.
27.
LundbergG. D. (2010) Unifying truths of the world’s religions, New Fairfield, CT: Heavenlight Press.
28.
LundhL. G.RadonV. (1998) Death anxiety as a function of belief in an afterlife: A comparison between a questionnaire measure and Stroop measure of death anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences25: 487–494.
29.
McConnellJ. M.DixonD. N. (2012) Perceived forgiveness from God and self-forgiveness. Journal of Psychology and Christianity31: 31–39.
30.
MorrisG. J.McAdieT. (2009) Are personality, well-being, and death anxiety related to religious affiliation?Mental Health, Religion & Culture12: 115–120.
31.
NeimeyerR. A. (1994) Death anxiety handbook: Research instrumentation, and application, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
32.
RobertsR. C. (2007) Spiritual emotions: A psychology of Christian virtues, Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
33.
SoenkeM.LandauM. J.GreenbergJ. (2012) Sacred armor: Religion’s role as buffer against the anxieties of life and the fear of death. In: PargamentK. I. (ed.) APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 105–122.
34.
StarkR.FinkeR. (2000) Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35.
StrelanP. (2007) Who forgives others, themselves, and situations? The roles of narcissism, guilt, self-esteem, and agreeableness. Personality and Individual Differences42: 259–269.
36.
WidamanK. F. (2012) Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In: CooperH. (ed.) APA handbook of research methods in psychologyVol. 3, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 361–389.
