In this paper we review the policies put in place by the main Western destination countries to attract highly skilled migrants. Two main systems can be identified. On the one hand, employer-driven schemes typically call for the migrant to meet a set of minimum skill requirements and to have a job offer before a work visa can be issued. On the other, migrant-driven schemes typically do not require a job offer, and instead select the migrant based on a set of characteristics chosen by the policymaker. Employer-driven schemes are the dominant policy tool in the sample of countries we consider in the analysis, and only Australia, Canada and New Zealand have made migrant-driven schemes the mainstay of their skill selective immigration policy. The preliminary evidence we review suggests that the latter are more effective in increasing the skill level of the immigrant population, and casts doubts on the usefulness of new initiatives like the EU blue card that are still based on an employer-driven system.
AydemirA. (2011), ‘Immigrant selection and short-term labor market outcomes by visa category’, Journal of Population Economics, 24, pp. 451–75.
2.
AydemirA.BorjasG.J. (2007), ‘Cross-country variation in the impact of international migration: Canada, Mexico, and the United States’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, pp. 63–78.
3.
BeachC.GreenA.G.WorswickC. (2007), ‘Impacts of the point system and immigration policy levers on skill characteristics of Canadian immigrants’, inChiswickB.R. (ed.), Immigration, Research in Labor Economics, 27, pp. 349–401.
4.
BoeriT.BrueckerH.DocquierF.RapoportH. (2012), Brain Drain and Brain Gain, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press.
Bruquetas-CallejoM.Garces-MascarenasB.Moren-AlegretR.PenninxR.Ruiz-VieytezE. (2008), ‘Immigration and integration policy making in Spain’, IMISCOE Working Paper No. 21.
ChaloffJ.LemaitreG. (2009), ‘Managing highly skilled labour migration: a comparative analysis of migration policies and challenges in OECD countries’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 79.
9.
Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2008), Facts and figures: Immigration Overview, Ottawa, CIC.
10.
Congressional Research Service (2006), ‘H1B visas: legislative history, trends over time and pathways to permanent residence’, mimeo, Washington DC, US Congress.
CzaikaM.De HaasH. (2013), ‘The effectiveness of immigration policies’, Population and Development Review, 39, pp. 487–508.
13.
De HaasH.CzaikaM. (2013), ‘Measuring migration policies: some conceptual and methodological reflections’, Migration and Citizenship, 1, pp. 40–47.
14.
European Commission (2004), Green Paper on an EU Approach to Managing Economic Migration, EC COM 2004/0811, Brussels.
15.
European Commission (2005), Communication from the Commission – Policy Plan on Legal Migration, COM 2005, 0669, Brussels.
16.
European Council (2004), Council Directive 2004/114/EC of 13 December 2004 on the Conditions of Admission of Third-Country Nationals for the Purposes of Studies, Pupil Exchange, Unremunerated Training or Voluntary Service, Brussels.
17.
European Council (2005), Council Directive 2005/71/EC of 12 October 2005 on a Specific Procedure for Admitting Third-Country Nationals for the Purposes of Scientific Research, Brussels.
18.
European Migration Network (2012), Annual Report on Immigration and Asylum Policy in France, Paris.
19.
FacchiniG.MaydaA.M. (2010), ‘What drives immigration policy? Evidence from a survey of government officials’, inGangI.EpsteinG.S. (eds), Culture and Migration Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, Volume X, World Scientific, pp. 605–48.
20.
FacchiniG.MaydaA.M.MishraP. (2011), ‘Do interest groups affect US immigration policy?’, Journal of International Economics, 85, pp. 114–28.
21.
FinotelliC. (2014), ‘High skilled migration in Germany and Spain’ Fieri Working Paper.
22.
GliedS.SarkarD. (2009), ‘The role of professional societies in regulating entry of skilled immigrants: The American Medical Association’, inBhagwatiJ.HansonG.H. (eds), Skilled migration: Problems, Prospects, and Policies, Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 184–206.
23.
GreenA.G.GreenD.A. (1999), ‘The economic goals of Canada's immigration policy, past and present’, Canadian Public Policy, 25, pp. 425–51.
HansenR., (1999), ‘The politics of citizenship in 1940s Britain: the British Nationality Act’, Twentieth Century British History, 10, pp. 67–95.
26.
HansenR., (2011), ‘Paradigm and policy shifts: British immigration policy, 1997–2011’, presentation at the conference on Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective.
27.
HolzmannR.KoettlJ.ChernetskyT. (2005), ‘Portability regimes of pensions and health care benefits for international migrants: an analysis of issues and good practices’, mimeo, The Global Commission on International Migration.
28.
IOM (2010), Migration and the Economic Crisis in the European Union: Implications for Policy, Geneva, IOM.
29.
IOM (2012), Labour Shortages and Migration Policy, Geneva, IOM.
30.
KerrW.R.LincolnW.F. (2010), ‘The supply side of innovation: H1-B visas reforms and US ethnic invention’, Journal of Labor Economics, 28, pp. 473–508.
31.
LaubenthalB. (2012), ‘Labour migration governance in contemporary Europe. The case of German’, LAB-MIG-GOV Country Report.
32.
LemaitreG.LiebigT.ThoreauC. (2007), Harmonized Statistics on Immigrant Inflows – Preliminary Results, Sources and Methods, Report, Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
33.
LiebigT. (2007), ‘The labour market integration of immigrants in Denmark’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers no. 50.
34.
LinacreS. (2007), ‘Migration: permanent additions to Australia's population’, Canberra, Australian Bureau of Statistics.
35.
Lopez-SalaA. (2013), ‘Managing uncertainty: immigration policies in Spain during economic recession (2008–2011)’, Migraciones Internacionales, 7 (2, pp. 39–69.
36.
McHaleJ.RogersK. (2009), ‘Selecting economic immigrants: a statistical approach’, WP 0145, National University of Ireland.
37.
Migration Advisory Committee (2012), Limits on Migration, Home Office.
38.
MukhopadhyayS.OxborrowD.R. (2012), ‘Value of an employment-based Green Card’, Demography, 49, pp. 219–37.
39.
National Contact Point, The Netherlands (2005), ‘A review of recent literature on the impact of immigration on Dutch society’, in
40.
Berlin Institute for Comparative Social Research (eds), The Impact of Immigration on Europe's Society: A Pilot Research Study undertaken by the European Migration Network, Berlin: BIVS.
41.
NeidhardtA. (2013), ‘Highly skilled Indian migrants in Europe: Italy’, CARIM India Research Report 2013–37.
42.
NZ Parliamentary Library (2008), ‘Immigration chronology: selected events 1840–2008’, Parliamentary Library Research Paper 2008/01, Wellington: Author.
OECD (2003b), New Zealand: Economic Survey, Paris: OECD.
45.
OECD (2013), International Migration Outlook 2013, OECD Publishing, doi:10.1787/migr_outlook-2013-en.
46.
PhillipsJ.SpinksH. (2012), ‘Skilled migration: temporary and permanent flows to Australia’, Background note, Parliamentary Library, Canberra.
47.
ProfitF.GelleniC.ZamoranoE. (2008), Migration and Education: Quality Assurance and Mutual Recognition of Qualifications – CaseStudy France, Paris, UNESCO.
48.
RuhsM. (2011) ‘Openness, skills and rights: an empirical analysis of labour immigration programmes in 46 high- and middle-income countries’, COMPAS Working Paper (www.compas.ox.ac.uk).
49.
RuhsM. (2013), The Price of Rights: Regulating International Labor Migration, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
