Research on anti-immigrant attitudes in the United Kingdom in the past has focused primarily on feelings of prejudice driven by local concentrations of ethnic minorities. The immigration debate, however, has arguably changed since the EU expansions and the economic crisis of the past decade. This paper tests whether public support for immigration restriction is empirically driven by factors such as resource scarcity and economic stagnation, skill supply of native and immigrant workers, and the origin of immigrants from poorer countries within and outside the EU. Survey data from the European Social Survey between 2002 and 2010 are matched with regional level indicators calculated using the UK Labour Force Surveys. Findings suggest that support for immigration restriction is higher in regions where more immigrants are unemployed, but lower in regions where more natives are unemployed for longer than a year. Both the origin and ethnicity of the immigrant population appear to play a role in immigration policy preferences among native respondents.
BarlowF.K.PaoliniS.PedersenA.HornseyM.J.RadkeH.R.M.HarwoodJ.RubinM.SibleyC.G. (2012), ‘The contact caveat: negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38 (12, pp. 1629–43.
2.
BillietJ.MeulemanB.De WitteH. (2014), ‘The relationship between ethnic threat and economic insecurity in times of economic crisis: analysis of European social survey data’, Migration Studies, 10.1093/migration/mnu023.
3.
BlumerH. (1958), ‘Race prejudice as a sense of group position’, Pacific Sociological Review, I (Spring), pp. 3–7.
4.
BoboL. (1983), ‘Whites’ opposition to busing: symbolic racism or realistic group conflict?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (6, pp. 1196–210.
5.
BonacichE. (1972), ‘A theory of ethnic antagonism: the split labor market’, American Sociological Review, 37, pp. 447–559.
6.
BorjasG.J. (1999), ‘The economic analysis of immigration’, Handbook of Labor Economics, pp. 1697–760.
7.
BowyerB.T. (2009), ‘The contextual determinants of whites’ racial attitudes in England’, British Journal of Political Science, 39 (3, pp. 559–86.
8.
BrantonR.P.JonesB.S. (2005), ‘Reexamining racial attitudes: the conditional relationship between diversity and socioeconomic environment’, American Journal of Political Science, 49 (2, pp. 359–72.
9.
ChristO.HewstoneM.TauschN.WagnerU.VociA.HughesJ.CairnsE. (2010), ‘Direct contact as a moderator of extended contact effects: cross-sectional and longitudinal impact on outgroup attitudes, behavioral intentions, and attitude certainty’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36 (12, pp. 1662–74.
10.
CitrinJ.GreenD.P.MusteC.WongC. (1997), ‘Public opinion toward immigration reform: the role of economic motivations’, The Journal of Politics, 59 (3, pp. 858–81.
11.
CrawleyH.DrinkwaterS.KauserR. (2013), ‘Regional variations in attitudes towards refugees: evidence from Great Britain’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 7647.
12.
DustmannC.FabbriF.PrestonI. (2005), ‘The impact of immigration on the British labour market’, The Economic Journal, 115 (507, F324–34.
13.
DustmannC.FrattiniT. (2013), ‘Immigration: the European experience’, inDavidC.StevenR. (eds), Immigration, Poverty, and Socioeconomic Inequality, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
DustmannC.PrestonI. (2001), ‘Attitudes to ethnic minorities, ethnic context and location decisions’, The Economic Journal, 111 (470, pp. 353–73.
15.
ElkinS.L.PanningW.H. (1975), ‘Structural effects and individual attitudes: racial prejudice in English cities’, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 39 (2, pp. 159–77.
16.
FacchiniG.MaydaA.M. (2009), ‘Does the welfare state affect individual attitudes toward immigrants? Evidence across countries’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91 (2, pp. 295–314.
17.
FordR.GoodwinM.J. (2010), ‘Angry white men: individual and contextual predictors of support for the British National Party’, Political Studies, 58 (1, pp. 1–25.
18.
HainmuellerJ.HiscoxM.J. (2010), ‘Attitudes towards highly skilled and low skilled immigration: evidence from a survey experiment’, American Political Science Review, 104 (1, pp. 61–84.
19.
HopkinsD.J. (2011), ‘National debates, local responses: the origins of local concern about immigration in Britain and the United States’, British Journal of Political Science, 41 (3, pp. 499–524.
20.
JohnstonR.GendallP.TrlinA.SpoonleyP. (2010), ‘Immigration, multiculturalism and geography: inter-group contact and attitudes to immigrants and cultural diversity in New Zealand’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 19 (3, pp. 343–69.
21.
MarkakiY.LonghiS. (2013), ‘What determines attitudes to immigration in European countries? An analysis at the regional level’, Migration Studies, 1 (3, pp. 311–37.
22.
MiddletonR. (1976), ‘Regional differences in prejudice’, American Sociological Review, 41 (1, pp. 94–117.
23.
MoultonB.R. (1990), ‘An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72 (2, pp. 334–8.
24.
QuillianL. (1995), ‘Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe’, American Sociological Review, 60 (4, pp. 586–611.
25.
QuillianL. (1996), ‘Group threat and regional change in attitudes toward African-Americans’, The American Journal of Sociology, 102 (3, pp. 816–60.
26.
RowthornD.ColemanR. (2004), ‘The economic effects of immigration into the United Kingdom’, Population and Development Review, 30 (4, pp. 579–624.
27.
RustenbachE. (2010), ‘Sources of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Europe: a multi-level analysis’, International Migration Review, 44 (1, pp. 53–77.
28.
SchaeferR.T. (1973), ‘Party affiliation and prejudice in Britain’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2 (3, pp. 296–9.
29.
SchaeferR.T. (1975), ‘Regional differences in prejudice’, Regional Studies, 9 (1, pp. 1–14.
30.
SchneiderS.L. (2007), ‘Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat’, European Sociological Review, 24 (1, pp. 53–67.
31.
SemyonovM.GlikmanA. (2009), ‘Ethnic residential segregation, social contacts, and anti-minority attitudes in European societies’, European Sociological Review, 25 (6, pp. 693–708.
32.
SlaughterK.F.ScheveM.J. (2001), ‘Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (1, pp. 133–45.
33.
SteinR.M.PostS.S.RindenA.L. (2000), ‘Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes’, Political Research Quarterly, 53 (2, pp. 285–303.
34.
StudiarD.T. (1977), ‘Social context and attitudes toward coloured immigrants’, The British Journal of Sociology, 28 (2, pp. 168–84.
35.
StudiarD.T. (1978), ‘Policy voting in Britain: the colored immigration issue in the 1964, 1966, and 1970 General Elections’, The American Political Science Review, 72 (1, pp. 46–64.
36.
TolsmaJ.LubbersM.CoendersM. (2008), ‘Ethnic competition and opposition to ethnic intermarriage in the Netherlands: a multi-level approach’, European Sociological Review, 24 (2, pp. 215–30.
37.
WagnerU.ChristO.PettigrewT.F.StellmacherJ.WolfC. (2006), ‘Prejudice and minority proportion contact instead of threat effects’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 69 (4, pp. 380–90.
38.
WesselT. (2009), ‘Does diversity in urban space enhance intergroup contact and tolerance?’, Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography, 91B (1, pp. 5–17.
