What policies and institutions are needed to sustain long-run growth in the UK? We describe an optimistic story of the UK economy over the past 30 years. From the late 1970s, the UK reversed a century of relative decline in terms of per capita GDP with our main counterparts in the US, France and Germany. A key factor behind this improvement was an array of policy changes including an expansion of higher education and greater competition in product and labour markets. However, major weaknesses with respect to long-run investment in human capital, infrastructure and innovation remain. These are hampered by problems of short-termism and policy risk. We propose a series of radical reforms to address these problems: such as more flexibility in schooling with a new focus on disadvantage; a new architecture for national infrastructure decisions and more competition in banking.
BartelsmanE., HaltiwangerJ.ScarpettaS. (2012), ‘Cross country differences in productivity: the role of allocation and selection’, University of Maryland mimeo (forthcoming American Economic Review).
7.
BeckT. (2012), ‘Finance and growth – lessons from the literature and the recent crisis’, Submission to the LSE Growth Commission, available at http://tinyurl.com/d79hz9z.
8.
BIS, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2009), Rowlands Review: The Provision of Growth Capital to UK Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, November.
9.
BIS, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2010), Financing a Private Sector Recovery, July.
10.
BIS, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2012), ‘SME access to external finance’, Department of Business, Innovation, and Skills Economics Paper No.16.
11.
Breedon Review (2012), Boosting Finance Options for Business, March.
12.
BurgessS., GreavesE., and VignolesA. (2009), ‘Parental choice of primary school in England: what ‘type’ of school do parents choose?’, Centre for Market and Public Organisation Working Paper Series No. 09/224.
13.
CanalesR.NandaR. (2012), ‘A darker side of decentralised banks: market power and credit rationing in SME lending’, Journal of Financial Economics, 105, pp. 353–66.
14.
Carbo-ValverdeS., Rodriguez-FernandezF.UdellG.F. (2009), ‘Bank market power and SME financing constraints’, Review of Finance, 13 (2), pp. 309–40.
15.
CardD., BlundellR.FreemanR. (2004), Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980–2000, National Bureau of Economic Research.
16.
Competition Commission (2002), The Supply of Banking Services by Clearing Banks to Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, March.
17.
CorryD., ValeroA.Van ReenenJ. (2011), ‘UK economic performance since 1997: growth, productivity and jobs’, Centre for Economic Performance Special Paper No. 24.
18.
CraftsN. (2012), ‘British relative economic decline revisited: the role of competition’, Explorations in Economic History, 49 (1), pp. 17–29.
19.
Cruickshank (2000), Report into Competition in UK Banking, March.
20.
Eddington Review (2006), The Eddington Transport Study: The Case for Action – Sir Rod Eddington's Advice to Government, December.
21.
FischerK.-H. (2000), Acquisition of Information in Loan Markets and Bank Market Power – An Empirical Investigation, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University.
22.
GriffithR., ReddingS.Van ReenenJ. (2004), ‘Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86 (4), pp. 883–95.
23.
HaldaneA.G.DaviesR. (2011), ‘The short long’, speech delivered at the 29th Société Universitaire Européene de Recherches Financières Colloquium ‘New Paradigms in Money and Finance?’, Brussels, May.
24.
HanushekE.A.RivkinS.G. (2006), ‘Teacher quality’, in Handbook of the Economics of Education, Volume 2, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 1052–78.
25.
HanushekE.A.RivkinS.G. (2010), ‘Generalizations about using value-added measure of teacher quality’, American Economic Review, May.
26.
HelmD. (2010), ‘Infrastructure and infrastructure finance: the role of the government and the private sector’, European Investment Bank Papers, 25 (2), pp. 8–27.
27.
HutchingsM., GreenwoodC., HollingworthS., MansarayA., RoseA., MintyS., and GlassK. (2012), Evaluation of the City Challenge programme, Department for Education, Research Report DFE-RR215.
28.
Independent Commission on Banking (2011), Final Report, September.
29.
JamisonM.A., LynneH.BergS. (2005), ‘Measuring and mitigating regulatory risk in private infrastructure investment’, The Electricity Journal, 18 (6), pp. 36–45.
30.
JenkinsS.P. (2012), ‘Distributionally-sensitive measures of national income and income growth’, mimeo, available at http://tinyurl.com/cjdavt9.
31.
KayJ. (2012), The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-Term Decision Making, Final Report, July.
32.
LSE Growth Commission (2013), Investing in Prosperity: Skills, Infrastructure and Innovation, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
33.
LindleyJ.MachinS. (2012), ‘Wage inequality in the labour years’, forthcoming in Oxford Review of Economic Policy.
34.
MachinS.VernoitJ. (2010), ‘Academy schools: who benefits?’, Centre for Economic Performance, paper no. CEPCP325, London School of Economics and Political Science.
35.
Macmillan Committee (1931), Report on the Committee on Finance and Industry, June.
36.
MemmelC., SchmiederC.SteinI. (2007), ‘Relationship lending: empirical evidence for Germany’, Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies No. 14.
37.
NESTA (2012), Plan I: The Case for Innovation-led Growth, National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, London.
38.
NeubergerD., PedergnanaM.Räthke-DöppnerS. (2008), ‘Concentration of banking relationships in Switzerland: the result of firm structure or banking market structure?’, Journal of Financial Services Research, 33 (2), pp. 101–26.
39.
NewberyD. (2012), ‘Energy and infrastructure’, submission to the LSE Growth Commission, available at http://tinyurl.com/c8qtahl.
40.
OECD (2012a), Going for Growth, Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
41.
OECD (2012b), Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2012, Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
42.
Ofgem (2012), Electricity Capacity Assessment, Office of the Gas and Electricity Markets, October.
43.
OFT (2006), Survey of SME Banking, Office of Fair Trading, July.
44.
OFT (2010), Review of Barriers to Entry, Expansion and Exit in Retail Banking, Office of Fair Trading, November.
45.
OguraY. (2007), ‘Lending competition, relationship banking, and credit availability for entrepreneurs’, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry Working Paper No. 07-E-036.
46.
OguraY. (2010), ‘Interbank competition and information production: evidence from the interest rate difference’, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19 (2), pp. 279–304.
47.
OultonN. (2012), ‘Hooray for GDP!’, Centre for Economic Performance occasional papers, CEPOP30, London School of Economics and Political Science.
48.
OultonN. (2013), ‘Has the growth of real GDP in the UK been overstated because of mis-measurement of banking output?’, National Institute Economic Review, 224, pp. R59–54.
49.
PetersenM.RajanR. (1995), ‘The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (2), pp. 407–43.
50.
PresbiteroA.F.ZazzaroA. (2011), ‘Competition and relationship lending: friends or foes?’, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20 (3), pp. 387–413.
51.
RivkinS.G., HanushekE.A.KainJ.F. (2005), ‘Teachers, schools, and academic achievement’, Econometrica, 73, 2, pp. 417–58.
52.
RompW.de HaanJ. (2007), ‘Public capital and economic growth: a critical survey’, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, 8(s1), pp. 6–52.
53.
SenA. (1976), ‘Real national income’, The Review of Economic Studies, 43 (1), pp. 19–39.
54.
SenA. (1979), ‘The welfare basis of real income comparisons’, Journal of Economic Literature, 17 (1), pp. 1–45.
55.
SkidelskyR., MartinF.WigstromC.W. (2011), Blueprint for a British Investment Bank, Centre for Global Studies, London.
56.
SlaterH., DaviesN.BurgessS. (2009), ‘Do teachers matter?: measuring the variation in teacher effectiveness in England’, Bristol Centre for Market and Public Organisation, Working Paper no 09/212.
57.
StiglitzJ., SenA., and FitoussiJ.-P. (2009), Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, available at http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm.
58.
StrahanP.E. (2008), ‘Bank structure and lending: what we do and do not know’, in ThakorA.V.BootA. (eds), Handbook of Financial Intermediation and Banking, Elsevier Science.
59.
TanziV.SchuknechtL. (2000), Public Spending in the 20th Century, Cambridge University Press.
60.
Van ReenenJohn (2011), ‘Wage inequality, technology and trade: 21st century evidence’, Labour Economics, 18 (6), pp. 730–41.
