The decline in trade union influence over the past two decades raises the question of whether pay levels in lower-skilled jobs now lie outside the unions’ sphere of influence, as tacitly acknowledged by their acceptance and later endorsement of the principle of the statutory minimum wage. This article examines pay levels among lower-skilled jobs in the private sector in Britain using the Workplace Employee Relations Survey of 1998. It shows that trade unions still had a positive impact upon pay levels in lower-skilled jobs and identifies those forms of unionism associated with the largest premiums. However, the article also shows that the activities of trade unions did little to counteract the forces generating the lowest levels of pay.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Airey, C., Hales, J., Hamilton, R., Korovessis, C., McKernan, A. and Purdon, S. (1999), The Workplace Employee Relations Survey (WERS) 1997-8: Technical Report, London, National Centre for Social Research.
2.
Ashton, D., Davies, B., Felstead, A. and Green, F. (1999), Work Skills in Britain, Research Centre on Skills, Knowledge and Organisational Performance, Universities of Oxford and Warwick.
3.
Blanchflower, D. and Cubbin, J. (1986), ‘Strike propensities in the British Workplace’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48(1), pp. 19-39.
4.
Booth, A. and Bryan, M. (2001), ‘The union membership wage-premium puzzle: is there a free-rider problem?’ mimeo, University of Essex.
5.
Craig, C., Rubery, J., Tarling, R. and Wilkinson, F. (1982), Labour Market Structure, Industrial Organisation and Low Pay, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
6.
Department of Trade and Industry (1999), ‘Workplace Employee Relations Survey: Cross-Section, 1999’ (computer file), 4th edition, Colchester, The Data Archive (distributor), 22 December, SN: 3955.
7.
Forth, J. and Kirby, S. (2000), Guide to the Analysis of the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey, Version 1.1, London, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
8.
Forth, J. and Millward, N. (2000), ‘The determinants of pay levels and fringe benefit provision in Britain’, National Institute Discussion Paper 171.
9.
Forth, J. and Millward, N. (2001), ‘The low-paid worker and the low-paying employer: characterisations using WERS 98’, National Institute Discussion Paper (forthcoming).
10.
Low Pay Commission (1998), The National Minimum Wage: First Report of the Low Pay Commission. Cmnd. 3976, London, The Stationary Office.
11.
Machin, S. (2000), ‘Union decline in Britain’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4), pp. 631-645.
12.
Machin, S., Stewart, M. and van Reenen, J. (1993), ‘The economic effects of multiple unionism: evidence from the 1984 Workplace Industrial Relations Survey’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95(3), pp. 279-296.
13.
Metcalf, D. (1999), ‘The Low Pay Commission and the National Minimum Wage’, Economic Journal, 109, pp. 46-66.
14.
Millward, N., Bryson, A. and Forth, J. (2000), All Change at Work?London, Routledge.
15.
Millward, N., Forth, J. and Bryson, A. (2001), Who calls the tune at work? The impact of trade unions on jobs and pay, York, York Publishing Services (forthcoming).
16.
Millward, N. and Woodland, S. (1995), ‘Gender segregation and male/female wage differences’, Gender, Work and Organization2(3), pp. 125-139.
17.
National Statistics (2000), Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Statistics for the United Kingdom, Small Business Service Research and Evaluation Unit, London, National Statistics.
18.
Office of National Statistics (1999), Annual Abstract of Statistics, London, The Stationery Office.
19.
Oi, W.J. and Idson, T.L. (1999), ‘Firm size and wages’, in Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science.
20.
Stewart, M. (1983), ‘On least squares estimation when the dependent variable is grouped’, Review of Economic Studies50(4), pp. 737-753.
21.
Stewart, M. (1987), ‘Collective bargaining arrangements, closed shops and relative pay’, Economic Journal97(1), pp. 140-156.
22.
Stewart, M. (1990), ‘Union wage differentials, product market influences and the division of rents’, Economic Journal100(4), pp. 1122-5637.
23.
StataCorp (1999a), Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. Reference Manual, vol. 4, Su-Z, College Station, Texas, Stata Corporation.
24.
StataCorp (1999b), Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. User’s Guide. College Station, Texas, Stata Corporation.
