Dispersion in pay is lower among union members than among non-unionists. This reflects two factors. First, union members and jobs are more homogeneous than their non-union counterparts. Second, union wage policies within and across firms lower pay dispersion. Unions’ minimum wage targets also truncate the lower tail of the union distribution. There are two major consequences of these egalitarian union wage policies. First, the return to human capital is lower in firms which recognise unions than in the unorganised sector. Second, unions compress the wage structure by gender, race and occupation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashenfelter, O. (1972), ‘Racial discrimination and trade unions’, Journal of Political Economy, 80, 3, Part I, May/June.
2.
Bell, B. and Pitt, M. (1998), ‘Trade union decline and the distribution of wages in the UK: evidence from kernel density estimation’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60, 4, pp. 509-528.
3.
Bland, P. (1999), ‘Trade union membership and recognition 1997-98: an analysis of data from the Certification Officer and the Labour Force Survey’, Labour Market Trends, July, pp. 343-351.
4.
Blau, F. and Khan, L. (1996), ‘International differences in male wage inequality: institutions versus market forces’, Journal of Political Economy, 104, 4, pp. 791-837.
5.
Booth, A. and Frank, J. (1999) ‘Earnings, productivity and performance-related pay’, Journal of Labor Economics, 17, 3, pp. 447-463.
6.
British Chamber of Commerce (1999), National Minimum Wage Survey, October.
7.
Brown, W., Deakin, S., Hudson, M., Pratten, C. and Ryan, P. (1998), ‘The individualisation of employment contracts in Britain’, Research Paper, Department of Trade and Industry.
8.
Brown, W. and Walsh, J. (1991), ‘Pay determination in Britain in the 1980s: the anatomy of decentralisation’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 7, 1, Spring, pp. 44-59.
9.
Burgess, S. and Metcalfe, P. (1999), ‘The use of incentive schemes in the public and private sectors: evidence from British establishments’, University of Bristol, mimeo, November.
10.
Clegg, H. (1970), The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
11.
Communication Workers Union (1999), ‘Performance-related pay - panacea or pain?’, CWU Internal Policy Document.
12.
Cully, M. and Woodland, S. (1998), ‘Trade union membership and recognition 1996-97: an analysis of data from the Certification Officer and the LFS’, Labour Market Trends, July, pp. 353-364.
13.
Cully, M., Woodland, S., Reilly, A. and Dix, G. (1999), Britain at Work, London, Routledge.
14.
Cully, M. and six others (1998), The 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey, First Findings, Department of Trade and Industry.
15.
Fernie, S. and Metcalf, D. (1999), ‘Not hanging on the telephone’, Advances in Industrial and Labor Economics, 9, pp. 23-68.
16.
Flanders, A. (1961), ‘Trade unions in the Sixties’, Socialist Commentary, August.
17.
Flanders, A. (1970), Management and Unions: The Theory and Reform of Industrial Relations, London, Faber.
18.
Freeman, R. (1982), ‘Union wage practices and wage dispersion within establishments’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 36, 1, October, pp. 3-18.
19.
Freeman, R. and Medoff, J. (1984), What Do Unions Do?, New York, Basic Books.
20.
Gosling, A. and Machin, S. (1995), ‘Trade unions and the dispersion of earnings in UK establishments 1980-90’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57, 2, pp.167-184.
21.
Gospel, H. and Drucker, J. (1998), ‘The survival of national bargaining in the electrical contracting industry: a deviant case’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36, 2, June, pp. 249-267.
22.
Green, F., Machin, S. and Manning, A. (1996), ‘The employer size- wage effect: can dynamic monopsony provide an explanation?’, Oxford Economic Papers, 48, pp. 433-455.
23.
Heery, E. (2000), ‘Trade unions and the management of reward’, in White, G. and Drucker, J. (eds), Reward Management: Critical Perspectives, London, Routledge.
24.
Heery, E. and Warhurst, J. (1994), ‘PRP and trade unions: impact and responses’, Kingston University Business School, Occasional Paper.
25.
Jackson, M.P., Leopold, J.W. and Tuck, K. (1993), Decentralization of Collective Bargaining: an Anaylsis of Recent Experience in the UK, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
26.
Kelly, J. and Heery, E. (1994), Working for the Union: British Trade Union Officers, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
27.
Kessler, S. and Bayliss, F. (1995), Contemporary British Industrial Relations, Basingstoke, Macmillan.
28.
Lazear, E. (1986), ‘Salaries and piece rates’, Journal of Business, 59, pp. 405-431.
29.
Local Government Association (1997), Evidence to Low Pay Commission, London, 2 October.
30.
Low Pay Commission (1998), The National Minimum Wage. First Report of the Low Pay Commision, CM3976, June, London, Stationery Office.
31.
Machin, S. (1999), ‘Pay inequality in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s’, in Gregg, P. and Wadsworth, J. (eds), The State of Working Britain, Manchester University Press.
32.
McNabb, R. and Whitfield, K. (1999), Low Pay in Britain: Analyses Using the 1998 WERS, Report to Low Pay Commission, July.
33.
Metcalf, D. (1982), ‘Unions and the distribution of earnings’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 16, 2, July, pp.163-169.
34.
Metcalf, D. (1999), ‘New Labour’s industrial relations policy’, Perspectives on Work, 3, 2, June.
35.
Metcalf, D., Hansen, K. and Charlwood, A. (2000), ‘Unions and the sword of justice’, CEP Discussion Paper No. 452, April 2000.
36.
Pendleton, A., Robinson, P. and Wilson, D. (1995), ‘Does employee ownership weaken trade unions? Recent evidence from the UK bus industry’, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 16.
37.
Phelps Brown, H. (1990), ‘The counter revolution of our time’, Industrial Relations, 29, 1, pp. 1-14.
38.
Rosyth Royal Dockyard (1992), Procedural Agreement for Industrial Employees.
39.
Slichter, S., Healy, J. and Livernash, R. (1960), The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management, Washington DC, The Brookings Institution.
40.
Swaffield, J. (1999), ‘Does measurement error bias fixed-effects estimates of the union wage effect?’ CEP, LSE, mimeo, September.
41.
Trade Union Congress (TUC) (1999a), Today’s Trade Unionists, Economic and Social Affairs Directorate, May.
42.
Trade Union Congress (TUC) (1999b), TUC Evidence to Low Pay Commission, October 1999.
43.
Transport and General Workers’ Union, (TGWU), Submission to the Low Pay Commission, London, 2 October.
44.
USDAW (1997), The Minimum Wage, Evidence to the Low Pay Commission, October.
45.
Webb, S. and Webb, B. (1902), Industrial Democracy, London, Longmans.
