Abstract
Intra-partum (IP) surveillance of the unborn child by cardiotacography (CTG) monitoring is the commonest obstetric procedure in the developed world. 1 It is also the most medico-legally contested obstetric procedure in labour. In 2011, ‘birth asphyxia’ comprised 50% of the UK National Health Service (NHS) litigation costs, 2 and in the 2000–2010 decade, the same NHS paid out £3.1 billion for maternity medico-legal claims (the highest of any speciality), mostly involving cerebral palsy and CTG misinterpretation. 3 This article looks at a number of characteristics of IP CTG monitoring which argue for its questionable solidity of base in court proceedings.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
