Molar development is widely accepted as a reliable indicator of chronological age in a forensic context. A quantitative method for age estimation has been proposed by Cameriere et al. based on the relationship between chronological age and the third molar maturity index (I3M), which is the ratio between the two apical pulp widths and the total tooth length. Cameriere’s cut off value of 0.08 was found to be a reliable tool in assessing the threshold of 18 years of age. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the I3M in different ethnic populations focusing on its specificity (subjects correctly classified as <18 years based on I3M >0.08) and sensitivity (subjects correctly classified as ≥18 years based on I3M <0.08). A review of 22 scientific articles was performed, representing data from panoramic radiographs of 12,286 individuals (5723 males and 6563 females) from all over the world, including some ethnical subgroups. The I3M showed an overall sensitivity for both sexes ranging from 51.8% to 93.4% and a specificity ranging from 86.2% to 100%. The proportion of correctly classified individuals ranged from 74% to 95%. These results can be useful to refer the age estimation with the margin of error of subjects correctly classified as minors (specificity) or adults (sensitivity), according to sex, ethnicity and geographical distribution. The I3M can be considered a suitable method for estimating adulthood in forensic settings, regardless of sex. However, ethnic group can affect the accuracy.
BallaSBGalicIKarunakerP, et al.
Validation of third molar maturity index (I3M) for discrimination of juvenile/adult status in South Indian population.J Forensic Leg Med2017;
49: 2–7.
3.
IntronaFCampobassoCP.Biological vs legal age of living individuals. In: SchmittACunhaEPinheiroJ (eds) Forensic anthropology and medicine. Complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death.
New York:
Humana Press, 2006, pp.57–82.
4.
CunhaEBaccinoEMartrilleL, et al.
The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review.Forensic Sci Int2009;
193: 1–13.
5.
SchmelingAGeserickGReisingerW, et al.
Age estimation.Forensic Sci Int2007;
165: 178–181.
6.
AlQahtaniSJHectorMPLiversidgeHM.Brief communication: the London atlas of human tooth development and eruption.Am J Phys Anthropol2010;
142: 481–490.
DemirjianAGoldsteinHTannerJM.A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol1973;
45: 211–227.
9.
AndersonDLThompsonGWPopovichF.Age of attainment of mineralization stages of the permanent dentition.J Forensic Sci1976;
21: 191–200.
10.
BlackSAggrawalAPayne-JamesJ.Age estimation in the living: the practitioner’s guide.
New York:
Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
11.
LiversidgeHM.Timing of human mandibular third molar formation.Ann Hum Biol2008;
35: 294–321.
12.
De LucaSPacificiAPacificiL, et al.
Third molar development by measurements of open apices in an Italian sample of living subjects.J Forensic Leg Med2016;
38: 36–42.
13.
ThevissenPWFieuwsSWillemsG.Human third molars development: comparison of 9 country specific populations.Forensic Sci Int2010;
201: 102–105.
14.
ThevissenPWAlqerbanAAsaumiJ, et al.
Human dental age estimation using third molar developmental stages: accuracy of age predictions not using country specific information.Forensic Sci Int2010;
201: 106–111.
15.
MincerHHHarrisEFBerrymanHE.The ABFO study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. J Forensic Sci1993;
38: 379–390.
16.
CameriereRFerranteLDe AngelisD, et al.
The comparison between measurement of open apices of third molars and Demirjian stages to test chronological age of over 18 year olds in living subjects.Int J Legal Med2008;
122: 493–497.
17.
GalićILaucTBrkićH, et al.
Cameriere’s third molar maturity index in assessing age of majority.Forensic Sci Int2015;
252: 191.e1–5.
18.
De LucaSBiagiRBegnoniG, et al.
Accuracy of Cameriere’s cut-off value for third molar in assessing 18 years of age.Forensic Sci Int2014;
235: 102.e1–6.
19.
Boyacıoğlu DoğruHGulsahiAÇehreliSB, et al.
Age of majority assessment in Dutch individuals based on Cameriere’s third molar maturity index. Forensic Sci Int2018;
282: 23.
20.
CameronNJonesLL.Growth maturation and age. In: BlackSAggrawalAPayne-JamesJ (eds) Age estimation in the living: the practitioner’s guide.
New York:
Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp.95–129.
21.
AlQahtaniSJKawtharAAlAraikA, et al.
Third molar cut-off value in assessing the legal age of 18 in Saudi population.Forensic Sci Int2017;
272: 64–67.
22.
AngelakopoulosNDe LucaSVelandia PalacioLA, et al.
Third molar maturity index (I3M) for assessing age of majority: study of a black South African sample.Int J Legal Med2018;
132: 1457–1464.
23.
AntunovicMGalicIZelicK, et al.
The third molars for indicating legal adult age in Montenegro.Leg Med2018;
33: 55–61.
24.
CameriereRSantoroVRocaR, et al.
Assessment of legal adult age of 18 by measurement of open apices of the third molars: study on the Albanian sample.Forensic Sci Int2014;
245: 205.e1–5.
25.
CameriereRVelandia PalacioLAPinaresJ, et al.
Assessment of second (I2M) and third (I3M) molar indices for establishing 14 and 16 legal ages and validation of the Cameriere’s I3M cut-off for 18 years old in Chilean population.Forensic Sci Int2018;
285: 205.e1–5.
26.
CavrićJGalićIVodanovićM, et al.
Third molar maturity index (I3M) for assessing age of majority in a black African population in Botswana.Int J Legal Med2016;
130: 1109–1120.
27.
ChuGWangYHLiMJ, et al.
Third molar maturity index (I3M) for assessing age of majority in northern Chinese population.Int J Legal Med2018;
132: 1759–1768.
28.
DardouriAAKCameriereRDe LucaS, et al.
Third molar maturity index by measurements of open apices in a Libyan sample of living subjects.Forensic Sci Int2016;
267: 230.e1–6.
29.
De LucaSAguilarLRiveraM, et al.
Accuracy of cut-off value by measurement of third molar index: study of a Colombian sample.Forensic Sci Int2016;
261: 160.e1–5.
30.
DeitosARCostaCMichel-CrosatoE, et al.
Age estimation among Brazilians: younger or older than 18. J Forensic Leg Med2015;
33: 111–115.
31.
FranklinDKarkhanisSFlavelA, et al.
Accuracy of a cut-off value based on the third molar index: validation in an Australian population.Forensic Sci Int2016;
266: 575.e1–6.
32.
GulsahiADe LucaSCehreliSB, et al.
Accuracy of the third molar index for assessing the legal majority of 18 years in Turkish population.Forensic Sci Int2016;
266: 584.e1–6.
33.
KelmendiJCameriereRKoçaniF, et al.
The third molar maturity index in indicating the legal adult age in Kosovar population.Int J Legal Med2018;
132: 1151–1159.
34.
Różyło-KalinowskaIKalinowskiP, et al.
Validity of the third molar maturity index I3M for indicating the adult age in the Polish population. Forensic Sci Int2018;
290: 352.
35.
SpinasEDe LucaSLampisL, et al.
Is the third molar maturity index (I3M) useful for a genetic isolate population? Study of a Sardinian sample of children and young adults.Int J Legal Med2018;
132: 1787–1794.
36.
ZelicKGalicINedeljkovicN, et al.
Accuracy of Cameriere’s third molar maturity index in assessing legal adulthood on Serbian population.Forensic Sci Int2016;
259: 127–132.
37.
TafrountCGalićIFranchiA, et al.
Third molar maturity index for indicating the legal adult age in southeastern France. Forensic Sci Int2018;
294: 218.e1–6.
38.
KumagaiATakahashiNPalacioLAV, et al.
Accuracy of the third molar index cut-off value for estimating 18 years of age: validation in a Japanese samples.Leg Med (Tokyo)2019;
38: 5–9.
39.
The United Nations Refugee Agency. Global Trends. Forced Displacement in 2017, www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2017/ (2017, accessed 30 July 2019).
SchmelingAGrundmannCFuhrmannA, et al.
Criteria for age estimation in living individuals.Int J Legal Med2008;
122: 457–460.
42.
SantoroVDe DonnoAMarroneM, et al.
Forensic age estimation of living individuals: a retrospective analysis. Forensic Sci Int2009;
193: 129.e1–4.
43.
SchmelingAOlzeAReisingerW, et al.
Statistical analysis and verification of forensic age estimation of living persons in the Institute of Legal Medicine of the Berlin University Hospital Charité. Legal Med2003;
5: S367–S371.
44.
PinchiVNorelliGABartoliniV.Ethical implications of Italian legislation on ‘epilepsy and driving’.J Med Ethics2014;
40: 552–527.
45.
OlzeASchmelingATaniguchiM, et al.
Forensic age estimation in living subjects: the ethnic factor in wisdom tooth mineralization.Int J Legal Med2004;
118: 170–173.
46.
DuM.Analysis of errors in forensic science. J Forensic Sci Med2017;
3: 139–143.
47.
RibeiroGTangenJMMcKimmieBM.Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int2019;
297: 138–147.
