Analysis of non-human DNA in forensic science, first reported about two decades ago, is now commonplace. Results have been used as evidence in court in a variety of cases ranging from abduction and murder to patent infringement and dog attack. DNA from diverse species, including commonly encountered pets such as dogs and cats, to plants, viruses and bacteria has been used and the sheer potential offered by such analyses has been proven. In this review, using case examples throughout, we detail the considerable literature in this field.
KanthaswamySTomBKMattilaAM. Canine population data generated from a multiplex STR kit for use in forensic casework. J Forensic Sci2009; 54: 829–840.
4.
HalversonJBastenC. A PCR multiplex and database for forensic DNA identification of dogs. J Forensic Sci2005; 50: 352–363.
5.
WictumEKunTLindquistC. Developmental validation of DogFiler, a novel multiplex for canine DNA profiling in forensic casework. Forensic Sci Int Genet2013; 7: 82–91.
6.
OgdenRMellanbyRJClementsD. Genetic data from 15 STR loci for forensic individual identification and parentage analyses in UK domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Forensic Sci Int Genet2012; 6: E63–E65.
7.
Menotti-RaymondMDavidVAPfluegerSM. Patterns of molecular genetic variation among cat breeds. Genomics2008; 91: 1–11.
8.
BaldingDJNicholsRA. DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Sci Int1994; 64: 125–140.
9.
BudowleBSheaBNiezgodaS. CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations. J Forensic Sci2001; 46: 453–489.
10.
AyresKLOverallAD. Allowing for within-subpopulation inbreeding in forensic match probabilities. Forensic Sci Int1999; 103: 207–216.
11.
WettonJHHiggsJESpriggsAC. Mitochondrial profiling of dog hairs. Forensic Sci Int2003; 133: 235–241.
12.
HalversonJBastenC. Forensic DNA identification of animal-derived trace evidence: Tools for linking victims and suspects. Croat Med J2005; 46: 598–605.
13.
YoonCK. Botanical witness for the prosecution. Science1993; 260: 894–895.
14.
CongiuLChiccaMCellaR. The use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers to identify strawberry varieties: a forensic application. Mol Ecol2000; 9: 229–232.
15.
DatwylerSLWeiblenGD. Genetic variation in hemp and marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) according to Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms. J Forensic Sci2006; 51: 371–375.
16.
HenryRJEdwardsMWatersDLE. Application of large-scale sequencing to marker discovery in plants. J Biosci2012; 37: 829–841.
17.
MetzkerMLMindellDPLiuX-M. Molecular evidence of HIV-1 transmission in a criminal case. PNAS USA2002; 99: 14292–14297.
18.
ConcheriGBertoldiDPoloneE. Chemical elemental distribution and soil DNA fingerprints provide the critical evidence in murder case investigation. PLoS ONE2011; 6: e20222–e20222.
19.
HollingsworthPMGrahamSWLittleDP. Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLOS One2011; 6: e19254–e19254.
20.
Miller CoyleH. Nonhuman DNA typing: theory and casework applications, Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, 2003.
21.
AlacsEAGeorgesAFitzSimmonsNN. DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics. Forensic Sci Med Pathol2010; 6: 180–194.
22.
LinacreATobeSS. An overview to the investigative approach to species testing in wildlife forensic science. Invest Genet2011; 2: 2–2.
23.
D’AndreaFFridezFCoquozR. Preliminary experiments on the transfer of animal hair during simulated criminal behavior. J Forensic Sci1998; 43: 1257–1258.
24.
PfeifferIVölkelITäubertH. Forensic DNA-typing of dog hair: DNA-extraction and PCR amplification. Forensic Sci Int2004; 141: 149–151.
25.
RobertsKACallowayC. Mitochondrial DNA amplification success rate as a function of hair morphology. J Forensic Sci2007; 52: 40–47.
26.
NewtonM. The encyclopedia of crime scene investigation, New York, USA: Facts on file Inc, 2008.
27.
EichmannCBergerBReinholdM. Canine–specific STR typing of saliva traces on dog bite wounds. Int J Leg Med2004; 118: 337–342.
28.
NaueJLutz-BonengelSPietschK. Bite through the tent. Int J Legal Med2012; 126: 483–488.
29.
CraftKJOwensJDAshleyMV. Application of plant DNA markers in forensic botany: Genetic comparison of Quercus evidence leaves to crime scene trees using microsatellites. Forensic Sci Int2007; 165: 64–70.
30.
Menotti-RaymondMDavidVAO'BrienSJ. Pet cat hair implicates murder suspect. Nature1997; 386: 774–774.
31.
FroschCDutsovAGeorgievG. Case report of a fatal bear attack documented by forensic wildlife genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet2011; 5: 342–344.
32.
PádárZEgyedBKontadakisK. Canine STR analyses in forensic practice: observation of a possible mutation in a dog hair. Int J Legal Med2002; 116: 286–288.
33.
TsujiAIshikoAKimuraH. Unusaul death of a baby: a dog attack and confirmation using human and canine STRs. Int J Legal Med2008; 122: 59–62.
34.
ShenJDuLaneyT. The investigation of the kidnapping of Danielle van Dam: The physical evidence perspective. Proc Am Acad Forensic Sci2005; 11: 15–15.
35.
SchneiderPMSeoYRittnerC. Forensic mtDNA hair analysis excludes a dog from having caused a traffic accident. Int J Legal Med1999; 112: 315–316.
36.
DoveCJDahlanNFHeackerM. Forensic bird-strike identification techniques used in an accident investigation at Wiley Post Airport, Oklahoma, 2008. Human-Wildlife Conflicts2009; 3: 179–185.
37.
NaueJLutz-BonengelSPietschK. Bite through the tent. Int J Legal Med2012; 126: 483–488.
38.
TsaiLi-CHsiehH-MWangJ-C. Cannabis seed identification by chloroplast and nuclear DNA. Forensic Sci Int2006; 158: 250–251.
39.
GaustererCSteinCStimpflT. Application of direct PCR in a forensic case of yew poisoning. Int J Legal Med2012; 126: 315–319.
40.
NugentKGSavilleBJ. Forensic analysis of hallucinogenic fungi: a DNA–based approach. Forensic Sci Int2004; 140: 147–157.
41.
OuC-YCiesielskiCAMyersG. Molecular epidemiology of HIV transmission in a dental practice. Science1992; 256: 1165–1171.
42.
HillisDMHuelsenbeckJP. Support for dental HIV transmission. Nature1994; 369: 24–25.
43.
CrandallKA. Intraspecific Phylogenetics: Support for dental transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus. J Virol1995; 69: 2351–2356.
44.
GoujonCPSchneiderVMGroftiJ. Phylogenetic analyses indicate an atypical nurse–to–patient transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1. J Virol2000; 74: 2525–2532.
45.
JaffeHWMcCurdyJMKalishML. Lack of HIV transmission in the practice of a dentist with AIDS. Annals Int Med1994; 121: 855–859.
KeimPVan ErtMNPearsonT. Anthrax molecular epidemiology and forensics: using the appropriate marker for different evolutionary scales. Inf Genet Evol2004; 4: 205–213.
48.
van AschBAlvesCGusmãoL. A new autosomal STR nineplex for canine identification and parentage testing. Electrophoresis2009; 30: 417–423.
49.
DaytonMKoskinenMTTomBK. Developmental validation of short tandem repeat reagent kit for forensic DNA profiling of canine biological Material. Croat Med J2009; 50: 268–285.
50.
KunTLyonsLASacksBN. Developmental validation of Mini-DogFiler for degraded canine DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet2013; 7: 151–158.
51.
ButlerJMDavidVAO’BrienSJ. The MeowPlex: A new DNA test using tetranucleotide STR Markers for the domestic cat. Profiles in DNA2002; 5: 7–10.
52.
Menotti-RaymondMADavidVAWachterLA. An STR forensic typing system for genetic individualization of domestic cat (Felis catus) samples. J Forensic Sci2005; 50: 1061–1070.
53.
CoomberNDavidVAO’BrienSJ. Validation of a short tandem repeat multiplex typing system for genetic individualization of domestic cat samples. Croat Med J2007; 48: 547–555.
54.
SavolainenPRosenBHolmbergA. Sequence analysis of domestic dog mitochondrial DNA for forensic use. J Forensic Sci1997; 42: 593–600.
55.
OkumuraNIshiguroNNakanoM. Intra- and interbreed genetic variations of mitochondrial DNA major non-coding regions in Japanese native dog breeds (Canis familiaris). Anim Genet1996; 27: 397–405.
56.
HassellRHeathPMusgrave-BrownE. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of domestic dogs in the UK. Forensic Sci Int Genet Supplement Series2008; 1: 598–599.
57.
GundryRLAllardMWMorettiTR. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of the domestic dog: control region variation within and among breeds. J Forensic Sci2007; 52: 562–572.
58.
DesmyterSGijsbersL. Belgian canine population and purebred study for forensics by improved mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Forensic Sci Int Genet2011; 6: 113–120.
59.
AnglebyHSavolainenP. Forensic informativity of domestic dog mtDNA control region sequences. Forensic Sci Int2005; 154: 99–100.
60.
WebbKMAllardMW. Identification of forensically informative SNPs in the domestic dog mitochondrial control region. J Forensic Sci2009; 54: 289–304.
61.
WebbKMAllardMW. Mitochondrial genome DNA analysis of the domestic dog: Identifying informative SNPs of the control region. J Forensic Sci2009; 54: 275–288.
62.
California v. Westerfield, Superior Court of California for San Diego County, 7/1/02.
63.
People v. Sutherland, Illinois Supreme Court, # 99047, 9/21/06.
64.
Miller CoyleHLaddCPalmbachT. The green revolution: Botanical contributions to forensics and drug enforcement. Croat Med J2001; 42: 340–345.
65.
Learn GH and Mullins JI. The microbial forensic use of HIV sequences. In: Leitner T, Foley B, Hahn B et al. (eds.) HIV Sequence Compendium. Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR number 04-7420, 2003, pp.22–37.
66.
BernardEJAzadYVandammeAM. HIV forensics: pitfalls and acceptable standards in the use of phylogenetic analysis as evidence in criminal investigations of HIV transmission. HIV Med2007; 8: 382–387.
67.
ScadutoDIBrownJMHaalandWC. Source identification in two criminal cases using phylogenetic analysis of HIV-1 DNA sequences. PNAS USA2010; 107: 21242–21247.
68.
MorenoLIMillsDFetscherJ. The application of amplicon length heterogeneity PCR (LH–PCR) for monitoring the dynamics of soil microbial communities associated with cadaver decomposition. J Microbiol Methods2011; 84: 388–393.
69.
HoffmasterARFitzgeraldCCRibotE. Molecular subtyping of Bacillus anthracis and the 2001 Bioterrorism-associated anthrax outbreak, United States. Emerging Inf Diseases2002; 8: 1111–1116.
70.
RaskoDAWorshamPLAbshireTG. Bacillus anthracis comparative genome analysis in support of the Amerithrax investigation. PNAS, USA2011; 108: 5027–5032.
71.
Miller CoyleHPalmbachTJulianoN. An overview of DNA methods for the identification and individualization of marijuana. Croatian Med J2003; 44: 315–321.
72.
GilmoreSPeakallRRobertsonJ. Organelle DNA haplotypes reflect crop–use characteristics and geographic origins of Cannabis sativa. Forensic Sci Int2007; 172: 179–190.
73.
HowardCGilmoreSRobertsonJ. Developmental validation of a Cannabis sativa STR multiplex system for forensic analysis. J Forensic Sci2008; 53: 1061–1067.
74.
HowardCGilmoreSRobertsonJ. A Cannabis sativa STR genotype database for Australian seizures: Forensic applications and limitations. J Forensic Sci2008; 53: 556–563.
75.
ClarkeMVandenbergN. Dog attack: the application of canine DNA profiling in forensic casework. Forensic Sci Med Pathol2010; 6: 151–157.
76.
People v. Kelly, 17 Cal.3d 24 Crim. No. 19028. Supreme Court of California. May 28, 1976.
77.
Frye v. United States 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
78.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).
79.
St. of Wa resp V. Kenneth Leuluaialii, app V St. of Wa Resp/cr-App V. George Tuilefano, App-Cr, Docket # 43507-8-I.
80.
Beamish v. Her Majesty The Queen, In the Supreme Court-Appeal Division for the Province of Prince Edward Island, Docket # AD-0693 & 7/22/99.
81.
State v. Schmidt (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/26/00), 771 So.2d 131 (La.App. 3 Cir., Jul 26, 2000) (NO. 99-1412) (DNA testing of HIV virus ruled admissible in an attempted murder case).
82.
California v. Westerfield, Superior Court of California for San Diego County, 7/1/02.
83.
People v. Ige, Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One No. D055893, 9-10-10.
84.
LinacreAGusmaõLHechtW. ISFG: Recommendations regarding the use of non–human (animal) DNA in forensic genetic investigations. Forensic Sci Int Genet2010; 5: 501–505.
