A study of business telephone calls provides quantitative evidence suggesting “intonational settings”: Certain attributes of intonation are sustained throughout discourse units in the calls (openings, business transactions, preclosures, and final closures), and differentiate one unit from another, as if phonologically significant aspects of intonation are realized within a space controlled by discourse-related parameters. Two types of parameter emerge, one controlling the midpoint of the F0 contour in frequency space, the other controlling the way it fluctuates.
AUER, P., & DILUZIO, A. (Eds.) (1992). The contextualisation of language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
2.
BROWN, G., CURRIE, K., & KENWORTHY, J. (1980). Questions of intonation. London: Croom Helm.
3.
BRUCE, G. (1982). Textual aspects of prosody in Swedish. Phonetica, 39, 274–287.
4.
BRUCE, G., FILIPPSON, M., FRID, J., GRANSTROM, B., GUSTAFSON, K., HORNE, M., & HOUSE, D. (1997). Global features in the modeling of intonation in spontaneous Swedish. In A. Botonis, G. Kouroupetroglou, & G. Carayiannis (Eds.), Proceedings of ESCA Workshop on Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications (pp. 59-62). Athens: ESCA and University of Athens.
5.
COUPER-KUHLEN, E. (1986). An introduction to English prosody. London: Edward Arnold.
6.
COUPER-KUHLEN, E., & SELTING, M. (1996). Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selling (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 11–56). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
7.
COWIE, R., SAWEY, M., & DOUGLAS-COWIE, E. (1995). A new speech analysis system: ASSESS (Automatic Statistical Summary of Elementary Speech Structures). In K. Elenius & P. Branderud (Eds.), Proceedings of XI 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 278-281). Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University.
8.
CUTLER, A., & PEARSON, M. (1986). On the analysis of prosodic turn-taking cues. In C. Johns-Lewis (Ed.), Intonation in discourse (pp. 139–155). London: Croom Helm.
9.
FRANCIS, G., & HUNSTON, S. (1992). Analyzing everyday conversation. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 123–161). London: Routledge.
10.
GELUYKENS, R., & SWERTS, M. (1994). Prosodic cues to discourse boundaries in experimental dialogues. Speech Communication, 15, 69–77.
11.
HOPPER, R. (1992). Telephone conversation. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
12.
HOUSE, J., & YOUD, N. (1991). Stylized prosody in telephone information services: Implications for synthesis. Proceedings of the XI 1th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 198-201). Aix-en-Provence: University of Provence.
13.
JOHNS-LEWIS, C. (Ed.) (1986). Intonation in discourse. London: Croom Helm.
14.
LAVER, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
15.
LEVINSON, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
16.
LIBERMAN, M., & McLEMORE, C. (1992). Structure and intonation of business telephone openings. Penn Review of Linguistics, 16, 68–83.
17.
LINDSTROM, A. (1994). Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings. Language in Society, 23, 231–252.
18.
PANESE, M. (1994). Prosody and conversation: Telephone-closings in radio-talk. Working Paper 24, KontRI (Kontextualisierung durch Rhythmus und Intonation). University of Konstanz: Department of Linguistics.
19.
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 346–380). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
20.
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23–78). New York: Irvington.
21.
SCHEGLOFF, E. A., & SACKS, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
22.
SINCLAIR, J., & COULTHARD, M. (1992). Towards an analysis of discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis. (pp. 1–34). London: Routledge.
23.
SLUIJTER, A., & TERKEN, J. (1992). The development and perception evaluation of a model for paragraph intonation in Dutch. In J. J. Ohala, T. M. Nearey, B. L. Derwing, M. M. Hodge, & G. E. Wiebe (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 353-356). Canada: Banff.
24.
SWERTS, M. (1994). Prosodic features of discourse units. Doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University.
25.
SWERTS, M., & GELUYKENS, R. (1994). Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language and Speech, 37(1), 21–43.
26.
TABACHNICK, B., & FIDELL, L. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
27.
THORSEN, N. G. (1985). Intonation and text in Standard Danish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 1205–1216.
28.
YULE, G. (1980). Speaker's topics and major paratones. Lingua, 52, 33–47.
