Measurements were made of the correspondence between acoustic (declination) units and auditory (intonation) units in American English conversation in an attempt to relate these two levels of description. The results showed that 99% of the acoustic unit boundaries coincided with auditory unit boundaries, indicating that the acoustic cues of F0 reset, pause, and speaker change used in defining the acoustic units were perceived, verifying the validity of both types of analyses. However, the units differed in scope, with many more auditory units occurring than acoustic units. This result suggests that the common practice of assuming the ‘intonational phrase’ to be the primary domain of prosodic phenomena such as declination does not adequately account for our data of larger periods of speech. Both acoustic and auditory analysis are needed for a satisfactory description of intonation. The establishment of a methodological connecting link between the acoustic and auditory dimensions suggests that further comparisons of such different data types may yield guidelines for regularizing the relationship between the two levels.
Bolinger, D.L. (1986a). Intonation across languages. In J. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, and E. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, Vol. 2, Phonology (pp. 471–524). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Bolinger, D.L. (1986b). Intonation and its Parts.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
Brazil, D. (1978). Discourse Intonation II.Birmingham, U.K.: English Language Research.
8.
Brown, G., Currie, K.L., and Kenworthy, J. (1980). Questions of Intonation.London: Croom Helm.
9.
Bruce, G. (1982). Textual aspects of prosody in Swedish. Phonetica, 39, 274–287.
10.
Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R.S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse (pp. 21–51). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
11.
Chafe, W. (1991). Prosodic and functional units of language. To appear In J.A. Edwards and M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding for Discourse Research.Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Cohen, A., and 'T Hart, J. (1965). Perceptual analysis of intonation patterns. Proceedings of the Vth International Congress on Acoustics, Liege 1964, paper A 16.
13.
Cohen, A., and T Hart, J. (1967). On the anatomy of intonation. Lingua, 19, 177–192.
14.
Collier, R. (1985). The setting and resetting of the baseline. Annual Bulletin of the Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (University of Tokyo), 19, 111–132.
15.
Cooper, W., and Sorensen, J.M. (1981). Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production.New York: Springer-Verlag.
16.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1986). An Introduction to English Prosody.Tübingen: Niemeyer.
17.
Cruttenden, A. (1986). Intonation.Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English.London: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Crystal, D. (1975). The English Tone of Voice.London: Arnold.
20.
Deese, J. (1980). Pauses, prosody, and the demands of production in language. In H.W. Dechert and M. Raupach (eds.), Temporal Variables in Speech (pp. 69–84). The Hague: Mouton.
21.
DE Pijper, J.R. (1983). Modelling British English Intonation.Dordrecht: Foris.
22.
Du Bois, J.W. (1985). Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (ed), Iconicity in Syntax (pp. 343–365). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
23.
Du Bois, J.W., Cumming, S., and Schuetze-Coburn, S. (1988). Discourse transcription. In S.A. Thompson (ed.), Discourse and Grammar (pp. 1–71). Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2.
24.
Du Bois, J.W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Paolino, D., and Cumming, S. (1991). Outline of discourse transcription. To appear In J.A. Edwards and M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding for Discourse Research.Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Gibbon, D. (1984). Intonation as an adaptive process. In D. Gibbon and H. Richter (eds.), Intonation, Accent and Rhythm: Studies in Discourse Phonology (pp. 165–192). Berlin: de Gruyter.
26.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers.New York: Academic Press.
27.
Graddol, D. (1986). Discourse specific pitch behavior. In C. Johns-Lewis (ed.), Intonation in Discourse (pp. 221–237). London: Croom Helm.
28.
Hadding, K., and Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1964). An experimental study of some intonation contours. Phonetica, 11, 175–185. Reprinted in D. Bolinger (ed.) (1972). Intonation: Selected Readings (pp. 348–358). Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin Books.
29.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1967). Intonation and Grammar in British English.The Hague: Mouton.
30.
T Hart, J., Collier, R., and Cohen, A. (1990). A Perceptual Study of Intonation.Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Jones, D. (1909) Intonation Curves.Leipzig: G.B. Teuber.
32.
Kingdon, R. (1958). The Groundwork of English Intonation.London: Longman, Green and Company.
33.
Krause, M. (1984). Recent developments in speech signal pitch extraction. In D. Gibbon and H. Richter (eds.), Intonation, Accent and Rhythm: Studies in Discourse Phonology (pp. 243–252). Berlin: de Gruyter.
34.
Ladd, D.R. (1984). Declination: A review and some hypotheses. Phonology Yearbook, 1, 53–74.
35.
Ladd, D.R. (1986). Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 311–340.
36.
Ladefoged, P. (1962). Elements of Acoustic Phonetics.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Liberman, M., and Pierrehumbert, J. (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aronoff and R.T. Oehrle (eds.), Language Sound Structure (pp. 157–233). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
Liberman, M., and Sag, I. (1974). Prosodic form and discourse function. Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 416–427.
40.
Lieberman, P. (1965). On the acoustic basis of perception of intonation by linguists. Word, 21, 40–54.
41.
Lieberman, P. (1967). Intonation, Perception, and Language.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Lieberman, P., and Blumstein, S. (1988). Speech Physiology, Speech Perception, and Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Lieberman, P., Katz, W., Jongman, A., Zimmerman, R., and Miller, M. (1985). Measures of the sentence intonation of read and spontaneous speech in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 649–657.
44.
Maeda, S. (1974). A characterization of fundamental frequency contours of speech. MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report No. 114. (XVI Speech Communication).
45.
Menn, L., and Boyce, S. (1982). Fundamental frequency and discourse structure. Language and Speech, 25, 341–383.
46.
Oreström, B. (1983). Turn-taking in English Conversation.Lund: CWK Gleerup.
47.
O'Shaughnessy, D. (1976). Modelling fundamental frequency and its relation to syntax, semantics and phonetics. PhD dissertation, MIT.
48.
Palmer, H.E. (1922). English Intonation, with Systematic Exercises.Cambridge: Heffer.
49.
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
50.
Pike, K.L. (1945). The Intonation of American English.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
51.
Quirk, R., Svartvik, J., Duckworth, A.P., Rusiecki, J.P.L., and Colin, A.J.T. (1964). Studies in the correspondence of prosodic to grammatical features in English. In Proceedings of the IXth International Congress of Linguistics.The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in R. Quirk (1968). Essays in English Language: Medieval and Modern (pp. 120–135). London: Longman.
52.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking. Language, 50, 696–735.
53.
Schuetze-Coburn, S. (In progress). Information flow in discourse. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
54.
Schuetze-Coburn, S., and Shapley, M. (Forthcoming). The coincidence of acoustically and auditorily based prosodic units with syntactic structure.
55.
Selting, M. (1987). Descriptive categories for the auditive analysis of intonation in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 777–791.
56.
Shapley, M. (1989). Fundamental frequency variation in conversational discourse. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
57.
Sorensen, J.M., and Cooper, W.E. (1980). Syntactic coding of fundamental frequency in speech production. In R.A. Cole (ed.), Perception and Production of Fluent Speech (pp. 399–440). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58.
Svartvik, J., and Quirk, R. (eds.) (1980). A Corpus of English Conversation.Lund, Sweden: CWK Gleerup.
59.
Thorsen, N. (1980). A study of the perception of sentence intonation — Evidence from Danish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1014–1030.
60.
Thorsen, N. (1983). Standard Danish sentence intonation — Phonetic data and their representation. Folia Linguistica, 17, 187–220.
61.
Thorsen, N. (1985). Intonation and text in Standard Danish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 1205–1216.
62.
Thorsen, N. (1986). Sentence intonation in textual context — Supplementary data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 1041–1047.
63.
Willems, N. (1982). English Intonation from a Dutch Point of View.Dordrecht: Foris.
64.
Yule, G. (1980). The speakers' topics and major paratones. Lingua, 52, 33–47.
