The acquisition of the formal structure of an artificial language was examined using variants of the language that featured no cues, single extralinguistic or linguistic cues, and correlated pairs of these cues to word class. While performance on a grammatical judgment test was generally better for single cues than no cues and equal for all types of single cues, performance for correlated pairs of cues only exceeded that of corresponding single cues when both cues were fairly transparent as markers. In addition, distinctiveness of the markings played a role in ease of acquisition. These results clarify previous artificial language learning results, and are in accord with data from natural language learning.
BATES, E., & MACWHINNEY, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
BILLMAN, D. (1989). Systems of correlations in rule and category learning: Use of structured input in learning syntactic categories. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 127–155.
3.
BILLMAN, D., & HEIT, E. (1988). Observational learning from internal feedback: A simulation of an adaptive learning method. Cognitive Science, 12, 587–625.
4.
BILLMAN, D., HEIT, E., & DORFMAN, J. (1987). Facilitation from clustered features: Using correlations in observational learning. In Proceedings of the ninth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 58–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BRAINE, M.D. S. (1987). What is learned in acquiring word classes - A step towards an acquisition theory. In B. MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 65–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
BROOKS, P.J., BRAINE, M.D. S., CATALANO, L., BRODY, R.E., & SUDHALTER, V. (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 76–95.
7.
CAIN, J., WEBER-OLSEN, M., & SMITH, R. (1987). Acquisition strategies in a first and second language: Are they the same? Journal of Child Language, 14, 333–352.
8.
CLAPPER, J.P., & BOWER, G.H. (1994). Category invention in unsupervised learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 443–460.
9.
GREEN, T.R. G. (1979). The necessity of syntax markers: Two experiments with artificial languages. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 481–496.
10.
KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language.Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
11.
KÖPCKE, K.M. (1982). Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartsprache.Tübingen: Niemeyer.
12.
LEVY, Y. (1983). The acquisition of Hebrew plurals: The case of the missing gender category. Journal of Child Language, 10, 107–121.
13.
MACWHINNEY, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43.
14.
MACWHINNEY, B., LEINBACH, J., TARABAN, R., & MCDONALD, J. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 255–277.
15.
MACWHINNEY, B., PLÉH, C., & BATES, E. (1985). The development of sentence interpretation in Hungarian. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 178–209.
16.
MALT, B.C., & SMITH, E.E. (1984). Correlated properties in natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 250–269.
17.
MARATSOS, M., & CHALKLEY, M.A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax. In K. Nelson (ed.), Children's language, Volume 2 (pp. 127–214). New York: Gardner Press.
18.
MEDIN, D.L., ALTOM, M.W., EDELSON, S.M., & FREKO, D. (1982). Correlated symptoms and simulated medical classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8, 37–50.
19.
MEIER, R.P., & BOWER, G.H. (1986). Semantic reference and phrasal grouping in the acquisition of a miniature phrase structure language. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 492–505.
20.
MILLS, A. (1986). The acquisition of gender.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
21.
MOESER, S.D., & BREGMAN, A. (1972). The role of reference in the acquisition of a miniature artificial language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 759–769.
22.
MORGAN, J.L., MEIER, R.P., & NEWPORT, E.L. (1987). Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of intonational and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 498–550.
23.
MORGAN, J.L., MEIER, R.P., & NEWPORT, E.L. (1989). Facilitating the acquisition of syntax with cross-sentential cues to phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 360–374.
24.
MORGAN, J.L., & NEWPORT, E.L. (1981). The role of constituent structure in the induction of an artificial language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 67–85.
25.
MORI, K., & MOESER, S.D. (1983). The role of syntax markers and semantic referents in learning an artificial language. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 701–718.
26.
PEREZ-PEREIRA, M. (1991). The acquisition of gender: What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language, 18, 571–590.
27.
PINKER, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
SCHLESINGER, I.M. (1982). Steps to language: Towards a theory of native language acquisition.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
SLOBIN, D.I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (eds.), Studies of child language development. (pp. 175–208). New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
30.
SLOBIN, D.I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (ed.) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol 2: Theoretical issues. (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
SLOBIN, D.I., & BEVER, T.G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–265.
32.
TARABAN, R., MCDONALD, J.L., & MACWHINNEY, B. (1989). Category learning in a connectionist model: Learning to decline the German definite article. In R. Corrigan, F. Eckman, & M. Noonan (eds.), Linguistic categorization (pp. 163–193). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
33.
VALIAN, V., & COULSON, S. (1988). Anchor points in language learning: The role of marker frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 71–86.
34.
VALIAN, V., & LEVITT, A.G. (1991). Intonation last: The utility of different cues to syntactic structure. Presentation at the 32nd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco.
35.
WATTENMAKER, W.D. (1993). Incidental concept learning, feature frequency and correlated properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 203–222.
36.
ZUBIN, D., & KÖPCKE, K.M. (1981). Gender: A less than arbitrary grammatical category. In R. Hendrik, C. Masek, & M. Miller (eds.), Papers from the seventh regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 439–449). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
