Ladd's reanalysis of Terken's (1991) results is critically examined, and some problems raised by Ladd's reinterpretation are discussed. Ladd's suggestion that listeners' normaliztion of Fo range involves abstract components (i.e., sources of information which are not directly observable in the acoustic signal) is accepted, and a quantitative model is proposed to account for judgments of perceived relative prominence.
Liberman, M., and Pierrehumbert, J. (1984). Intonation invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aronoff and R. Oehrle (eds.), Language Sound and Structure (pp. 157–233). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
2.
Pierrehumbert, J. (1979). The perception of fundamental frequency declination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 363–369.
3.
Terken, J. (1991). Fundamental frequency and perceived prominence of accented syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 1768–1776.
4.
Terken, J. (1993). Human and synthetic intonation. A case study. In V. Van Heuven and L. Pols (eds.), Analysis and Synthesis of Speech: Strategic Research towards High-Quality Text-to-Speech Generation.Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
