Block, N. (1986). Advertisement for a semantics for psychology. In P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 10: Studies in the Philosophy of Mind (pp. 615–678). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
Davidson, E. (1984). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53, 810–842.
4.
Fodor, J. (1981). The present status of the innateness controversy. In Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science (pp. 257–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Fodor, J., and Lepore, E. (1992). Holism: A Shopper's Guide.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6.
Gilhooly, K.J., and Gilhooly, M.L. (1979). Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic tasks. Memory & Cognition, 2, 214–223.
7.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
8.
Grice, H.P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
10.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of “meaning”. In Mind, Language, and Reality (Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2) (pp. 215–271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Quine, W.V.O. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays.New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
Rosch, E., and Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
14.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
15.
Smith, E.E., and Medin, D.L. (1981). Categories and Concepts.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.
17.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations.New York: Macmillan.