Spectral characteristics of some selected phoneme sequences are investigated in an attempt to explain cross-linguistic tendencies in phonotactic constraints. A hypothesis is offered that some universal sequential constraints are acoustically motivated. Two acoustic factors are posited as determinants of favored/disfavored sequences: The magnitude of acoustic modulation within a sequence and the degree of acoustic difference between sequences. The hypothesis is tested experimentally for its applicability to some of the universal constraints. Trajectories of the first three formants are obtained for selected sequences of stop + liquid + vowel, stop + glide + vowel, stop + vowel, and vowel + stop. Standard Euclidcan distance in frequency is computed as a measure approximating each acoustic factor. The results show that some universally rare or unstable phoneme sequences can be explained on the basis of their lack of spectral modulation and/or their spectral similarity to other sequences, suggesting that acoustic/auditory factors play a significant role in determining the phonetic shape of language.
Abercrombie, D. (1937). tu:[UNKNOWN]:li “transkrip∫nz”. Le Maître Phonétique, 59, 34–36.
2.
Bell, A., and Hooper, J. (1978). Issues and evidence in syllabic phonology. In A. Bell and J. Hooper (eds.), Syllables and Segments (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: North Holland.
3.
Chiri, M. (1956). Ainugo Nyumon.Tokyo: Nire Shobo.
4.
Cutting, J. (1975). Predicting initial cluster frequencies by phonemic difference. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-42/43, 233–239.
5.
Diver, W. (1975). Phonology as human behavior. Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 27–57.
6.
Durand, M. (1956). Du rôle de l'auditeur dans la formation des sons du langage. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 52, 347–355.
7.
Greenberg, J. (1978). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language, Vol. 2: Phonology (pp. 243–279). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Hockett, C. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics.New York: Macmillan.
9.
Hofmann, T. (1967). Initial clusters in English. Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report (MIT), 84, 263–274.
10.
Hooper, J. (1976). An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology.New York: Academic Press.
11.
Jakobson, R., and Halle, M. (1956). Fundamentals of Language.The Hague: Mouton.
12.
Janson, T. (1986). Cross-linguistic trends in the frequency of CV sequences. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 179–195.
13.
Javkin, H. (1977). Phonetic universals and phonological change. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
14.
Jonasson, J. (1971). Perceptual similarity and articulatory reinterpretation as a source of phonological innovation. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Reports (Stockholm University), 1, 30–41.
15.
Kawasaki, H. (1982). An acoustical basis for universal constraints on sound sequences. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
16.
Liljencrants, J., and Lindblom, B. (1972). Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language, 48, 839–862.
17.
Lindblom, B. (1975). Experiments in sound structure. Paper presented at the 8th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Leeds, 1975.
18.
Lindblom, B. (1984). Can the models of evolutionary biology be applied to phonetic problems? In M.P.R. van den Broecke and A. Cohen (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 67–81). Dordrecht: Foris.
19.
Lindblom, B. (1986). Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In J. Ohala and J. Jaeger (eds.), Experimental Phonology (pp. 13–44). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20.
Lindblom, B. (1988). Models of phonetic variation and selection. Paper presented at the Conference on Language Change and Biological Evolution, Institute for Scientific Interchange, Turin, 1988.
21.
Lindblom, B. (1990). On the notion of “possible speech sound”. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 135–152.
22.
Lindblom, B., and Engstrand, O. (1989). In what sense is speech quantal? Journal of Phonetics, 17, 107–121.
23.
Lindblom, B., and Lubker, J. (1985). The speech homunculus and a problem of phonetic linguistics. In V. Fromkin (ed.), Phonetic Linguistics (pp. 169–192). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
24.
Malmberg, B. (1965). Stability and instability of syllabic structures.Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 403–408). New York: S. Karger.
25.
Ohala, J. (1974a). Experimental historical linguistics. In J. Anderson and C. Jones (eds.), Historical Linguistics II: Theory and Description in Phonology (pp. 353–389). Amsterdam: North Holland.
26.
Ohala, J. (1974b). Phonetic explanation in phonology. In A. Bruck, R. Fox, and M. LaGaly (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology (pp. 251–274). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
27.
Ohala, J. (1975). Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns. In C. Ferguson, L. Hyman, and J. Ohala (eds.), Nasálfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization (pp. 289–316). Stanford, CA: Language Universals Project.
28.
Ohala, J. (1978a). Phonological notations as models. In W. Dressler and W. Meid (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Linguists (pp. 811–816). Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
29.
Ohala, J. (1978b). Southern Bantu vs. the world: The case of palatalization of labials. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 4, 370–386.
30.
Ohala, J. (1979). The contribution of acoustic phonetics to phonology. In B. Lindblom and S. Öhman (eds.), Frontiers of Speech Communication Research (pp. 355–363). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Ohala, J. (1980). The application of phonological universals in speech pathology. In N. Lass (ed.), Speech and Language: Advance in Basic Research and Practice, Vol. 3 (pp. 75–97). New York: Academic Press.
32.
Ohala, J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In C. Masek, R. Hendrick, and M. Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior (pp. 178–203). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
33.
Ohala, J. (1984). Phonological end justifies any means. In S. Hattori and K. Inoue (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Linguists (pp. 232–243). Tokyo: ICL Editorial Committee.
34.
Ohala, J. (1985). Around flat. In V. Fromkin (ed.), Phonetic Linguistics (pp. 223–241). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
35.
Ohala, J., and Kawasaki, H. (1984). Prosodic phonology and phonetics. Phonology Yearbook, 1, 113–127.
36.
Ohala, J., and Lorentz, J. (1977). The story of [w]: An exercise in the phonetic explanation for sound patterns. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 3, 577–599.
37.
Ohala, J., and Riordan, C. (1979). Passive vocal tract enlargement during voiced stops. In J. Wolf and D. Klatt (eds.), Speech Communication Papers (pp. 89–92). New York: Acoustical Society of America.
38.
Oishi, H., and Uemura, Y. (1975). Hogen to Hyojungo: Nihongo Hogengaku Gaisetsu.Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.
39.
Passy, P. (1890). Étude sur les changements phonétiques.Paris: Librairie Firmin-Didot.
40.
Pope, M. (1934). From Latin to Modern French with Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman.Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
41.
Saporta, S. (1955). Frequency of consonant clusters. Language, 31, 25–30.
42.
Schroeder, M. (1968). Similarity measure for automatic speech and speaker recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 375–377.
43.
Stevens, K. (1972). The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In E. David, Jr. and P. Denes (eds.), Human Communication: A Unified View (pp. 52–66). New York: McGraw-Hill.
44.
Stevens, K. (1973). Further theoretical and experimental bases for quantal places of articulation for consonants. Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report (MIT), 108, 247–252.
45.
Sweet, H. (1892). A New English Grammar, Logical and Historical, Part I: Introduction, Phonology, and Accidence.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46.
Wallace, J. (1969). Katu phonemes.Mon-Khmer Studies III, Publication No. 4 (pp. 64–73). Saigon: Linguistic Circle of Saigon.
47.
Wright, J. (1986). The behavior of nasalized vowels in the perceptual vowel space. In J. Ohala and J. Jaeger (eds.), Experimental Phonology (pp. 45–67). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
