Two experiments were conducted to investigate the processing of ambiguous words that varied in frequency of use of their multiple interpretations. Biasing sentential contexts were used in a cross-modal priming paradigm in which targets were presented for lexical decision at two different intervals relative to the occurrence of the ambiguous word. The results replicate previous work showing that both interpretations of an ambiguous word are accessed and that there arc no differences in amount of priming due to frequency. During selection of the appropriate interpretation, however, there is evidence of sensitivity to information about frequency and context. The results indicate that, whereas lexical access is an autonomous process, selection of the appropriate interpretation is a post-lexical process that is influenced by frequency information and context. Recent challenges to the use of the lexical decision task and to the autonomy view of lexical access are also considered.
Burgess, C, Tanenhaus, M.K. and Seidenberg, M.S., (1987). Context and lexical access: Implications of non-word interference for lexical ambiguity resolution. University of Rochester Cognitive Science Technical Report.
2.
Forster, K.I., (1976). Accessing the mentallexicon. In K.J. Wales and E. Walker (Eds.),. New Approaches to Language Mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North Holland.
3.
Forster, K.I., (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W.E. Cooper and E.C.T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 27–85). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
4.
Forster, K.I. and Bednall, E.S., (1976). Terminating the exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 4, 53–61.
5.
Gildea, P., (1983). On Resolving Ambiguity: Can Context Constrain Lexical Access? Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.
6.
Glucksberg, S., Kreuz, R.J. and Rho, S.H., (1986). Context can constrain lexical access: Implications for models of language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 323–335.
7.
Hogaboam, T.W. and Perfetti, C.A., (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 265–274.
8.
Hudson, S.B. and Tanenhaus, M.K., (1984, June). Ambiguity resolution in the absence of contextual bias. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boulder, Colorado.
9.
Kausler, D.H. and Kollasch, S.F., (1970). Word associations to homographs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 444–449.
10.
Kiger, J.I. and Glass, A.L., (1983). The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target. Memory and Cognition, 11, 356–365.
11.
Koriat, A., (1981). Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association. Memory and Cognition, 9, 587–598.
12.
Kučera, H. and Francis, W., (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-day American English. Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press.
13.
Lorge, I. and Thorndyke, E.L., (1938). A Semantic Count of English Words. New York: Teachers College.
14.
Marslen-Wilson, W. and Tyler, L.K., (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–71.
15.
Marslen-Wilson, W. and Welsh, A., (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–63.
16.
Oden, G.C. and Spira, J.L., (1983). Influence of context on the activation and selection of ambiguous word senses. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 51–64.
17.
Onifer, W. and Swinney, D.A., (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9, 225–236.
18.
Ratcliff, R. and McKoon, G., (1981). Does activation really spread?Psychological Review, 88, 454–462.
19.
Seidenberg, M.S., Tanenhaus, M.K., Leiman, J.M. and Bienkowski, M., (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489–537.
20.
Seidenberg, M.S., Waters, G.S., Sanders M. and Langer, P., (1984). Pre- and post-lexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 12, 315–328.
21.
Simpson, G.B., (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 120–136.
22.
Simpson, G.B., (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 316–340.
23.
Simpson, G.B. and Burgess, C., (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 28–39.
24.
Simpson, G.B., Peterson, R.R., Casteel, M.A. and Burgess, C., (1985, November). Lexical and sentence context effects in word recognition. Paper presented at the meetings of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, Massachusetts.
25.
Swinney, D.A., (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.
26.
Tanenhaus, M.K. and Donnenworth-Nolan, S., (1984). Syntactic context and lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 649–662.
27.
Tanenhaus, M.K., Leiman, J.M. and Seidenberg, M.S., (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427–440.
28.
Underwood, B.J. and Schulz, R.W., (1960). Meaningfulness and Verbal Learning. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
29.
Yates, J., (1978). Priming dominant and unusual senses of ambiguous words. Memory and Cognition, 6, 636–643.
