Two experiments investigated how people assign an interpretation to question phrases. In order to determine the meaning of the WH-phrase (e.g., who, what), a “gap” must be located and the role associated with the gap assigned to the WH-phrase. Two experiments tested the Lexical Expectation model of Fodor (1978), according to which lexical properties of the verb determine when a gap is posited, and the All Resorts model of Stowe (1984), according to which all possibilities are considered and evaluated on their pragmatic appropriateness. In Experiment 1, subjects judged the meaningfulness of full sentences. The frequency with which verbs are used transitively determined whether there was an effect of the plausibility of the WH-phrase to act as an object of the verb. Effects of plausibility of the WH-phrase as an object showed up in just those cases where the object role should be assigned to the WH-phrase according to the Lexical Expectation model, rather than as predicted by the All Resorts model. In Experiment 2, these results were replicated using the word-by-word self-paced reading paradigm. The plausibility effect showed up at the verb itself when it is normally used transitively. This evidence suggests that a gap is preferred even over a lexically filled object for transitive expectation verbs.
Boland, J., Tanenhaus, M.K., Carlson, G.N., and Garnsey, S.M. (1989). Lexical projection and the interaction of syntax and semantics in parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 563–576.
2.
Carlson, G.N., and Tanenhaus, M.K. (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. In W. Wilkins (ed), Thematic Relations (pp. 263–288). New York: Academic Press.
3.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding.Dordrecht: Foris.
4.
Clifton, C., and Frazier, L. (1989). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G.N. Carlson and M.K. Tanenhaus (eds.), Linguistic Structure in Language Processing (pp. 273–317). Dordrecht: Reidel.
5.
Clifton, C., Frazier, L., and Connine, C. (1984). Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 696–708.
6.
Connine, C., Ferreira, F., Jones, C., Clifton, C., and Frazier, L. (1984). Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 307–319.
7.
Crain, S., and Fodor, J.D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D.R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky (eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectivesé (pp. 24–128). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Crain, S., and Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological syntax processor. In D.R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky (eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 320–358). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Ferreira, F., and Henderson, J.M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 555–568.
10.
Fodor, J.D. (1978). Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 427–474.
11.
Ford, M., Bresnan, J., and Kaplan, R. (1982). A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (pp. 727–796). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Frazier, L., and Clifton, C. (1989). Identifying gaps in English sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 93–126.
13.
Frazier, L., and Flores D'arcais, G.B. (1989). Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331–344.
14.
Garnsey, S.M., Tanenhaus, M.K. and Chapman, R.M. (1988). Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 51–60.
15.
Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G.K., and Sag, I.A. (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Holmes, V., Stowe, L.A., and Cupples, L. (1989). Lexical expectations in parsing complement verb sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 668–689.
17.
Jackendoff, R.S., and Culicover, P. (1971). A reconsideration of dative movements, Foundations of Language, 7, 397–412.
18.
Kaplan, R., and Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-Functional Grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (pp. 173–281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Kurtzman, H. (1985). Studies in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
20.
Mitchell, D.C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance XII (pp. 601–618). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
Mitchell, D.C., and Holmes, V. (1985). The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences with local structural ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 542–559.
22.
Nicol, J., and Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 5–20.
23.
Stowe, L.A. (1984). Models of Gap Location in the Human Language Parser.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
24.
Stowe, L.A. (1986). Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location, Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227–245.
25.
Stowe, L.A. (1988). Thematic structures and sentence comprehension. In G. Carlson and M.K. Tanenhaus (eds.), Linguistic Structure in Language Processing (pp. 319–357). Dordrecht: Reidel.
26.
Stowe, L.A., and Holmes, V. (1990). Verb information in the resolution of closure ambiguities. Unpublished manuscript.
27.
Swinney, D., Ford, M., Frauenfelder, U., and Bresnan, J. (1988). On the temporal course of gap-filling and antecedent assignment during sentence comprehension. Unpublished manuscript.
28.
Tanenhaus, M.K., Burgess, C., Hudson-D'zmura, S., and Carlson, G.N. (1987). Thematic roles in language processing.Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Cognitive Science Society Meetings (pp. 587–596). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
Tanenhaus, M.K., and Carlson, G.N. (1989). Lexical structure and language comprehension. In W.D. Marslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process (pp. 529–561). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
Tanenhaus, M.K., Boland, J.E., Garnsey, S.M., and Carlson, G.N. (1989). Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 37–50.
31.
Tanenhaus, M.K., Garnsey, S.M., and Boland, J.E. (1991). Combinatory lexical information and language comprehension. In G. Altmann (ed.), Computational and Experimental Approaches to Speech and Language (pp. 179–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
