One important aspect of the current growing interest in testing claims about the psychological reality of various linguistic phenomena is the exploration of new experimental paradigms for accomplishing this testing. This paper explores the use of the standard classical conditioning and concept-formation paradigms, using the notion of the phoneme (in particular the claim that naïve speakers perceive allophones of a phoneme as being "the same"), as the focus of the inquiry. In Experiment 1, subjects were trained by classical conditioning (shock-GSR) to respond to words containing what is analyzed as one allophone of the phoneme /k/ in English (the aspirated allophone), and then were played words containing other allophones ([k], [k°] ) as well as non-/k/-words, to see if there was generalization of response to these phonetically different but phonologically "same" sounds. In Experiment 2, subjects were asked to perform a category-formation task: they were trained that the correct category was words containing the aspirated allophone of /k/; they were then tested to see if they would include other allophones in the category. (Particular attention was paid to the categorization of the [k] after word-initial /s/.) The subjects in both experiments made phoneme-like responses. Implications of these results for the theory of the phoneme and for future experimentation are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker, W.J., Prideaux, G.C. and Derwing, B.L. ( 1973). Grammatical properties of sentences as a basis for concept formation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 2, 210-220.
2.
Bloomfield, L. ( 1933). Language (New York).
3.
Brown, R. and McNeill, D. ( 1966). The 'tip of the tongue' phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325 -337.
4.
Chistovich, L. ( 1971). Problems of speech perception. In L.L. Hammerich, R. Jakobson and E. Zwirner (eds.), Form and Substance (Copenhagen) , pp. 83-93.
5.
Davidsen-Nielsen, N. ( 1974). Syllabification in English words with medial sp, st, sk. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 15-45.
6.
Davis, J. ( 1967). Auditory search for syllables embedded within meaningful sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 1277-1282.
7.
Deese, J. and Hulse, S. ( 1967). The Psychology of Learning (New York).
8.
Denes, P.B. and Von Keller, T.G. ( 1968). Articulatory segmentation for automatic recognition of speech. 6th International Congress on Phonetics (Tokyo) August 21-28, 1968, pp. B-143-146.
9.
Derwing, B.L. ( 1973). Transformational Grammar as a Theory of Language Acquisition (Cambridge).
10.
Dominowski, R.L. ( 1970). Concept attainment. In M.H. Marx (ed.), Learning: Interactions (New York), pp. 152-191.
11.
Feather, B.W. ( 1965). Semantic generalization of classically conditioned responses: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 425-441.
12.
Fink, R. ( 1974). Orthography and the perception of stops after s. Language and Speech, 17, 152-159.
13.
Foss, D.J. and Swinney, D.A. ( 1973). On the psychological reality of the phoneme: Perception, identification, and consciousness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 246-257.
14.
Fromkin, V.A. ( 1966). Neuro-muscular specification of linguistic units . Language and Speech, 9, 170-199.
15.
Fromkin, V.A. ( 1970). Tips of the slung - or - to err is human. University of California Working Papers in Phonetics, 14, 40-79.
16.
Fujimura, O. ( 1971). Remarks on stop consonants - synthesis experiments and acoustic cues. In L.L. Hammerich, R. Jakobson and E. Zwirner (eds.), Form and Substance (Copenhagen), pp. 221-232.
17.
Gormezano, I. and Moore, J.W. ( 1969). Classical conditioning. In M.H. Marx (ed.), Learning: Processes (New York), 121-203.
18.
Grings, W.W. and Dawson, M.W. ( 1973). Complex variables in conditioning. In W.F. Prokasy and D.C. Raskin (eds.), Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research (New York), pp. 204-245.
19.
Hilgard, E.G. ( 1951). Methods and procedures in the study of learning . In S.S. Stevens (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology (New York), pp. 517-567.
20.
Hooper, J. ( 1976). An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology (New York).
21.
Jaeger, J.J. ( 1977). The psychological reality of phonemes: What's in a /k/?Paper presented at the California Linguistics Association Conference, Fresno, CA.
22.
Jaeger, J.J. ( 1979). Vowel shift rule vs. spelling rules: Which is psychologically real?Paper presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, CA.
23.
Jaeger, J.J. (forthcoming). Concept formation as a tool for linguistic research. To appear in J.J. Ohala (ed.), Experimental Phonology .
24.
Jakobson, R., Fant, G. and Halle, M. ( 1951). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and their Correlates (Cambridge, Mass.).
25.
Jones, D. ( 1957). The history and meaning of the term 'phoneme.' Reprinted in Jones, W.E. and Laver, J. (eds.) (1973), Phonetics in Linguistics (London), pp. 187-204.
26.
Kalish, H.I. ( 1969). Stimulus generalization. In M.H. Marx (ed.), Learning: Processes (New York), pp. 207-297.
27.
Kent, R.D. ( 1973). Imitation of synthetic vowels and some implications for speech memory. Phonetica, 28, 1-25.
28.
Klatt, D.H. ( 1968). The structure of confusions in short-term memory between English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 44, 401-107.
29.
Krámský, J. ( 1974). The Phoneme: Introduction to the History and Theories of a Concept (München).
30.
Ladefoged, P. ( 1975). A Course in Phonetics (New York).
31.
Liberman, A.M., Harris, K., Hoffman, H. and Griffith, B. ( 1957). This discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 54, 358-368.
32.
Lisker, L. and Abramson, A.S. ( 1964). A cross-language study of voicing of initial stops: Acoustic measurements. Word, 20, 384-422.
33.
Lotz, J., Abramson, A., Gerstman, L., Ingemann, F. and Nemser, H. ( 1960). The perception of English stops by speakers of English, Spanish, Hungarian, and Thai: A tape-cutting experiment. Language and Speech, 3, 71-77.
34.
Mackay, D.G., (1972). The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 210-227.
35.
Macneilage, P. and Ladefoged, P. ( 1976). The production of speech and language. In E. Carterette and M. Friedman (eds.), Handbook of Perception: Language and Speech, Vol. 7 (New York), pp. 75-120.
36.
McNeill, D. and Lindig, D. ( 1973). The perceptual reality of phonemes, syllables, words, and sequences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 12, 419-430.
37.
Öhman, S.E. ( 1966). Perception of segments of VCCV utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 40, 979-988.
Read, C. ( 1971). Pre-school children's knowledge of English phonology . Harvard Educational Review, 41, 1-34.
40.
Reddy, D.R. ( 1967). Phoneme grouping for machine recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 1295-1300.
41.
Reeds, J.A. and Wang, W.S.-Y. (1961). The perception of stops after s. Phonetica, 6, 78-81.
42.
SAPIR, E. (1933). La Réalité psychologique des phonèmes. Journal de Psychologies Normale et Pathologique, 30, 247-265 [Also (in English) in Mandelbaum, D.G. (ed.) (1949), Selected Writings of Edward Sapir (Berkeley), pp. 46-60.]
43.
Savin, H.B. and Bever, T.G. ( 1970). The non-perceptual reality of the phoneme. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 259-302.
44.
Schane, S.A. ( 1968). On the non-uniqueness of phonological representations . Language, 44, 709-716.
45.
Scholes, R.J. ( 1967). Categorical responses to synthetic vowel stimuli by speakers of various languages. Language and Speech, 10, 252-282.
46.
Swadesh, M. ( 1934). The phonemic principle. Language , 10, 117-129.
47.
Twaddell, W.F. ( 1935). On defining the phoneme. Language Monographs, No. 16.
48.
Van Valin, R.D., Jr. (1976). Perceived distance between vowel stimuli . Journal of Phonetics, 4, 51-58.
49.
Warren, R.M. and Warren, R.P. ( 1970). Auditory illusions and confusions. Scientific American, December, 30-36.
50.
Wickelgren, W.A. ( 1966). Phonemic similarity and interference in short-term memory for single letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 71, 396-404.
