The Acoustic Parameters of Stress in Relation to Syllable Position,Speech Loudness and Rate

Abstract

Previous research suggests that at the acoustic level stress is characterized by a complex trading relationship between syllabic fundamental frequency, duration, and amplitude. The present investigation was an attempt to isolate certain speech variables which in addition to phonetic quality and context may exert consistent influences on this trading relationship. Recordings were made of ten speakers' productions of the sentences " Say /'sasa/ please " and " Say /sa'sa/ please " spoken at normal, increased, and decreased rates and loudness of utterance. Spectrographic and oscilloscopic analysis of /'sasa/ and /sa'sa/ revealed the following: (1) Syllable position is a highly significant determiner of the acoustic character of stress, fundamental frequency contrast predominating in /'sαsα/ and duration contrast predominating in /sα'sα/; (2) Fundamental frequency and amplitude contrast between stressed and unstressed syllabics is significantly less during soft speech as compared to normal speech, suggesting that duration is the predominant feature of stress during soft speech; (3) Increased and decreased rate of utterance were not found to have significant effects on the degree of duration contrast between stressed and unstressed syllabics.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ando, K. and Canter, G. ( 1969). A study of syllabic stress in some English words produced by deaf and normally hearing speakers. Language and Speech , 21, 247.

Black, J. ( 1949). Natural frequency, duration, and intensity of vowels in reading. J. Speech Hrng. Res., 14, 216.

Delattre, P. ( 1962). Some factors of vowels duration and their cross-linguistic validity. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 34, 1141.

Fry, D.B. ( 1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 27, 765.

Fry, D.B. .( 1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126.

House, A. ( 1961). On vowel duration in English. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 33, 1174.

House, A. and Fairbanks, G. ( 1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary characteristics of vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. , 25, 105.

Ladefoged, P. ( 1967). Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics ( London).

Lehiste, I. ( 1970). Suprasegmentals (Cambridge , Mass.).

10.

Lehiste, I. and Peterson, G. ( 1959). Vowel amplitude and phonemic stress in American English. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 31, 428.

11.

Lieberman, P. ( 1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 32, 451.

12.

Lieberman, P. ( 1967). Intonation, Perception and Language ( Cambridge, Mass.).

13.

Lindblom, B. ( 1967). Temporal patterning in syllable production. Speech Trans. Lab. (R.I.T., Stockholm), 2-3, 1-19.

14.

Morton, J. and Jassem, W. ( 1965). Acoustic correlates of stress. Language and Speech, 8, 159.

15.

Murray, T. ( 1970). Intensity variation during vocal fry phonation . J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 41, 119 (abstract).

16.

Peterson, G. and Lehiste, I. ( 1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 32, 693.

17.

Tiffany, W. ( 1959). Non-random sources of variation in vowel quality . J. Speech Hrng., Res. 2, 305.

18.

Tiffin, J. and Steer, M. ( 1937). An experimental analysis of emphasis. Speech Monogr., 6, 69.