The study investigates the perception of vowel length contrasts in Cantonese by native Mandarin speakers with varying degrees of experience in Cantonese: naïve listeners (no exposure), inexperienced learners (~1 year), and experienced learners (~5 years). While vowel length contrasts do not exist in Mandarin, they are, to some extent, exploited in English, the second language (L2) of all the participants. Using an AXB discrimination task, we investigate how native and L2 phonological knowledge affects the acquisition of vowel length contrasts in a third language (L3). The results revealed that all participant groups could discriminate three contrastive vowel pairs (/aː/–/ɐ/, /ɛː/–/e/, /ɔː/–/o/), but their performance was influenced by the degree of Cantonese exposure, particularly for learners in the early stage of acquisition. In addition to vowel quality differences, durational differences were proposed to explain the perceptual patterns. Furthermore, L2 English perception of the participants was found to modulate the perception of L3 Cantonese vowel length contrasts. Our findings demonstrate the bi-directional interaction between languages acquired at different stages, and provide concrete data to evaluate some speech acquisition models.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
2.
BauerL.WarrenP. (2004). New Zealand English: Phonology. In SchneiderE. W.BurridgeK.KortmannB.MesthrieR.UptonC. (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, 1: Phonology (pp. 580–602). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
3.
BauerR. S.BenedictP. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
4.
BehneD.AraiT.CziglerP.SullivanK. (1999). Vowel duration and spectra as perceptual cues to vowel quantity: A comparison of Japanese and Swedish. In OhalaJ. J.HasegawaY.OhalaM.GranvilleD.BaileyA. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 857–860).
5.
BestC. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In StrangeW., (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 171–203). Timonium, MD: York.
6.
BestC. T.McRobertsG. W.SitholeN. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345–360.
7.
BestC. T.TylerM. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In MunroM. J.BohnO.-S. (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
8.
BlicherD. L.DiehlR. L.CohenL. B. (1990). Effects of syllable duration on the perception of the mandarin tone 2/tone3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 37–49.
9.
BoersmaP.EscuderoP.HayesR. (2003). Learning abstract phonological from auditory phonetic categories: an integrated model for the acquisition of language-specific sound categories. In SoleM. J.RecasensD.RomeroJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 1013–1016). Barcelona, Spain: Causal Productions.
10.
BohnO. S. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 279–304). Timonium, MD: York Press.
BrowmanC. P.GoldsteinL. M. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 55–80.
13.
Cabrelli AmaroJ. (2012). L3 Phonology: An understudied domain. In Cabrelli AmaroJ.FlynnS.RothmanJ. (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 33–60). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
14.
Cabrelli AmaroJ. (2013). The Phonological Permeability Hypothesis: Measuring regressive L3 influence to test L2 phonological representations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
15.
Cabrelli AmaroJ. (2017a). Testing the phonological permeability hypothesis: L3 phonological effects on L1 versus L2 systems. International Journal of Bilingualis, 21, 698–717.
16.
Cabrelli AmaroJ. (2017b). Regressive transfer in L3 syntactic development. In HahnA.AngelovskaT. (Eds.), L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
17.
Cabrelli AmaroJ.RothmanJ. (2010). On L3 acquisition and phonological permeability: A new test case for debates on the mental representation of non-native phonological systems. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 275–296.
18.
Cabrelli AmaroJ.WrembelM. (2016). Investigating the acquisition of phonology in a third language – a state of the science and an outlook for the future. International Journal of Multilingualism (Special Issue on Advances in the Investigation of L3 Phonological Acquisition), 7, 395–409.
19.
ChenH. (2011). The acquisition of vowel length in Cantonese (MPhil Thesis). The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
20.
CheungH. N. S. (1972). Xianggang Yueyu yufa de yanjiu (Cantonese as Spoken in Hong Kong). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
21.
CheungK. H. (1986). The phonology of present-day Cantonese (PhD dissertation). University College London, UK.
22.
DavenportM.HannahsS. J. (2010). Introducing phonetics and phonology. London, UK: Hodder Education.
23.
DuanmuS. (2007). The phonology of standard Chinese (2nd edition). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
EscuderoP. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.
25.
EscuderoP. (2009). The linguistic perception of similar L2 sounds. In BoersmaP.HamannS. (Eds.), Phonology and phonetics: Phonology in perception (pp. 151–190). Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.
26.
EscuderoP.WilliamsD. (2011). Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Peruvian Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, EL1–EL7.
27.
FlegeJ. E. (1988). Factors affecting degree of perceived FA in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 70–79.
28.
FlegeJ. E. (1989). Chinese subjects’ perception of the word-final English /t/ - /d/ contrast: Performance before and after training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1684–1697.
29.
FlegeJ. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
30.
FlegeJ. E. (1999a). Age of learning and second-language speech. In BirdsongD.P. (Ed.), New perspectives on the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition (pp. 101–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
FlegeJ. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In SchillerN. O.MeyerA. (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production, differences and similarities (pp. 319–355). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
32.
FlegeJ. E.BohnO.JangS. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.
33.
FlegeJ. E.LiuS. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.
34.
FlynnS.FoleyC.VinnitskayaI. (2004). The cumulative enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3–16.
35.
FosterK. I.FosterJ. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
36.
GarcíaA. (2013). The effects of L2 proficiency on L3 phonological acquisition: A preliminary test of the L2 proficiency hypothesis. In VossE.TaiS. J. D.LiZ. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2011 second language research forum (pp. 173–186). Somerville, MACascadilla.
37.
GiegerichH. J. (1992). English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Hadding-KochK.AbramsonA. S. (1964). Duration versus spectrum in Swedish vowels: Some perceptual experiments. Studia Linguistica, 18, 94–107.
39.
HouseA. S. (1961). On vowel duration in English. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 33, 1174–1182.
40.
HuiB. (2010). Backward transfer from L3 French to L2 English production of relative clauses by L1 Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 45–60.
41.
IivonenA.HarnudH. (2005). Acoustical comparison of the monophthong systems in Finnish, Mongolian and Udmurt. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35, 59–71.
42.
JiaG.StrangeW.WuY.ColladoJ.GuanQ. (2006). Perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin speakers: Age-related differences vary with amount of L2 exposure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1118–1130.
43.
KaoD. (1971). The structure of the syllable in Cantonese. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
44.
LeeA.MokP. (2018). Acquisition of Japanese quantity contrasts by L1 Cantonese speakers. Second Language Research, 34, 419–448.
45.
LeeT. H.-t. (1983). The vowel system in two varieties of Cantonese. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 57, 97–114.
46.
LeeT. H.-t. (1985). Guangzhou hua de yinzhi ji chang duan duili (Opposition of vowel quality and length in Cantonese). Fangyan (Dialect), 1, 28–38.
47.
LeeW.ZeeE. (2003). Standard Chinese (Beijing). Journal of the International Phonetic Association: Illustrations of the IPA, 33, 109–112.
LinY. H. (2007). The sounds of Chinese. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52.
LiuS. (1987). Guangzhou hua de chang duan yuanyin wenti (Problems on vowel length in Guangzhou Cantonese). In Editorial board of the Chinese Language Department of Nankai University (Ed.), Yuyan yanjiu luncong (Essays on Language Research) (p. 3). Tianjin, China: Tianjin People Press.
53.
LiuS. (2003). Guangzhou hua yuanyin yinwei de liangge wenti (Two problems on vowel phonemes in Guangzhou Cantonese). In BohuiZhang (Ed.), Di ba jie guoji yue fangyan taolun hui lunwen ji (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Yue Dialects). Beijing, China: Zhongguo Sheke Chubanshe (Chinese Social Science Publishers).
54.
LiuS.SamuelA. G. (2004). Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when f0 information is neutralized. Language and Speech, 47, 109–138.
55.
LlamaR.López-MorelosL. P. (2016). VOT production by Spanish heritage speakers in a trilingual context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13, 444–458.
McAllisterR.FlegeJ. E.PiskeT. (2002). The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229–258.
58.
MontrulS.DiasR.SantosH. (2011). Clitics and object expression in the L3 acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese: Structural similarity matters for transfer. Second Language Research, 27, 21–58.
59.
OddenD. (2011). The representation of vowel length. In van OostendorpM.EwenC. J.HumeE. H.RiceK. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (pp. 465–490). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
60.
PolkaL. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2961–2977.
61.
QinZ.JongmanA. (2016). Does second language experience modulate perception of tones in a third language?Language and Speech, 59, 318–338.
62.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
63.
RineyT. J.FlegeJ. E. (1998). Changes over time in global foreign accent and liquid identifiability and accuracy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 213–244.
64.
RothmanJ. (2010). On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause high/low attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Teaching, 48, 245–273.
65.
RothmanJ. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27, 107–27.
66.
RothmanJ. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the typological primacy model of third language (L3) transfer: Considering the role of timing of acquisition and proficiency in the previous languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 179–190.
67.
SchmidM. S.GilbersS.NotaA. (2014). Ultimate attainment in late second language acquisition: Phonetic and grammatical challenges in advanced Dutch-English bilingualism. Second Language Research, 30, 129–157.
68.
ShiF.LiuY. (2002). Xianggang yueyu chang duan yuanyin de tingbian shiyan (A perceptual experiment on vowel length in Hong Kong Cantonese). In WuyunP. (Ed.), Dongfang yuyan yu wenhua (Oriental Languages and Cultures) (pp. 98–109). Shanghai, China: Orient Press.
69.
ShiF.LiuY. (2005). Guangzhou hua yuanyin de zai fenxi (Revisit vowels in Guangzhou Cantonese). Fangyan (Dialects), 1, 1–8.
70.
ShiF.MaiY. (2003). Guangzhou hua chang [a] he duan [ɐ] yuanyin de tingbian shiyan (A perceptual experiment on the long vowel [a] and short vowel [ɐ] in Guangzhou Cantonese). Zhongguo Yunwen Yanjiu (Chinese Language Studies), 2, 50–60.
71.
TremblayM. C. (2006). Cross-Linguistic influence in third language acquisition: The role of L2 proficiency and L2 exposure. Ottawa Papers in Linguistics, 34, 109–119.
72.
TylerM. D.BestC. T.FaberA.LevittA. G. (2014). Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts. Phonetica, 71, 4–21.
73.
VanceT. J. (2008). The sounds of Japanese. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
WangZ. (1999). Guangzhou hua de yuanyin xitong (The vowel system in Guangzhou Cantonese). In LiejiongXu (Eds.), Gongxing yu gexing: Hanyu yuyanxue zhong de zhengyi (Universals and Particulars - Controversies in Chinese Linguistics), 255–287. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
75.
WarrenP. (2018). Quality and quantity in New Zealand English vowel contrasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 48, 305–330.
76.
WerkerJ.TeesR. (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1866–1878.
77.
WongS. L. (1941). Yue Yin Jun Hui (A Chinese syllabary pronounced according to the dialect of Canton). Shanghai, China: Zhonghua Book Company.
78.
WrembelM. (2012). Foreign accentedness in third language acquisition: The case of L3 English. In Cabrelli AmaroJ.FlynnS.RothmanJ. (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 281–309). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
79.
WrembelM.GutU.MehlhornG. (2010). Phonetics/phonology in third language acquisition—Introduction. International Journal of Multilingualism (Special Issue on L3 phonology), 7, 1–3.
80.
YuanJ. (1960). Hanyu Fangyan Gaiyao (A synopsis of Chinese dialects). Beijing, China: The Writing Reform Publishing House.
81.
Yue-HashimotoA. O. (1972). Cantonese (the Yue dialects I). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82.
ZeeE. (1999). Chinese (Hong Kong Cantonese). In NolanF.EslingJ. (Eds.), Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (pp. 58–60). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83.
ZeeE. (2003). Frequency analysis of the vowels in Cantonese from 50 male and 50 female speakers. In SoléM. J.RecasensD.RomeroJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 1117–1120).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
