Cross-Linguistic Association Between Phonological Awareness and Connected Speech Perception Skills of Chinese EFL Young Learners

Abstract

Phonological awareness (PA) is of great significance to children’s early language learning and cognitive development. However, there has been a clear lack of research on the role of PA in developing children’s perception of connected speech in foreign languages. Thus, this study focused on the cross-linguistic association between PA and children’s connected speech perception skills. A total of 82 10- to-11-year-old Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners participated in a battery of tasks on English connected speech perception and English and Chinese PA. The data yielded three critical results based on correlation, linear regression, Sobel test, and bootstrapping analyses. First, EFL young learners’ English connected speech perception skills were significantly associated with their English and Chinese PA. Second, English phonemic and Chinese sound awareness were recognized as predictors of their connected speech perception skills. Moreover, the results further revealed that Chinese tone awareness predicted English connected speech perception skills via a direct pathway through Chinese sound awareness as a mediator. These findings demonstrated a cross-linguistic positive correlation between PA and connected speech perception skills from graphic to alphabetic characters in childhood. The results of this study shed light on teaching strategies for connected speech in EFL primary school education.

Keywords

Connected speech perception phonological awareness cross-linguistic correlation EFL young learners

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alameen

Levis

J. M.

(2015). Connected speech. In Reed

Levis

(Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 157–174). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346952.ch9

Allerton

D. J.

(2000). Articulatory inertia vs ‘systemzwang’: Changes in liaison phenomena in recent British English. English Studies, 81(6), 574–581. https://doi.org/10.1076/enst.81.6.574.9183

Amini

(2003). Phonological awareness: Its development and contribution to reading and spelling achievement. Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa, 31, 19–51.

Anthony

J. L.

Lonigan

C. J.

(2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.43

Ardini

S. N.

(2015). Top-down and bottom-up processing in listening. Which one is problematic: A case of Universitas PGRI Semarang. ETERNAL English Teaching Journal, 6(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v6i2.5834

Zare

Yan

(2024). The development of English connected speech perception skills: An empirical study on 9-to-12-year Chinese EFL children. Phonetica, 81, 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2023-0049

Bishop

D. V.

Nation

Patterson

(2014). When words fail us: Insights into language processing from developmental and acquired disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0403

Bohn

O. S.

Munro

M. J.

(2007). Language experience in second language speech learning. John Benjamins Publishing.

Broersma

Cutler

(2011). Competition dynamics of second-language listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.499174

10.

Brown

J. D.

(2006). Authentic communication: Whyzit importan’ta teach reduced forms. In Newfields

Gledall

Kawate-Mierzejewska

Ishida

Chapman

Ross

(Eds.), The proceedings of the 5th Annual JALT Pan-SIG Conference (pp. 13–24). Tokai University. https://hosted.jalt.org/pansig/2006/HTML/Brown.htm

11.

Brown

J. D.

(2012). New ways in teaching connected speech. TESOL International Association.

12.

Brown

J. D.

Kondo-Brown

(2006). Perspectives on teaching connected speech to second language speakers. National Foreign Language Resource Center.

13.

Brown

(2005). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Elsevier Science.

14.

Burki

Ernestus

Gendrot

Fougeron

Frauenfelder

U. H.

(2011). What affects the presence versus absence of schwa and its duration: A corpus analysis of French connected speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(6), 3980–3991. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3658386

15.

Bybee

J. L.

(2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Hoffmann

Trousdale

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004

16.

Byers-Heinlein

(2018). Speech perception. In Grosjean

Byers-Heinlein

(Eds.), The listening bilingual speech processing in children (pp. 151–175). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118835722.ch8

17.

Byers-Heinlein

Lew-Williams

(2013). Bilingualism in the early years: What the Science says. LEARNing Landscapes, 7(1), 95–112.

18.

Chang

C. B.

(2018). Perceptual attention as the locus of transfer to non-native speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.003

19.

Chang

C. B.

Mishler

(2012). Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 2700–2710. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4747615

20.

Chen

Liu

Kager

(2015). Cross-linguistic perception of Mandarin tone sandhi. Language Sciences, 48, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.002

21.

Chung

K. K.

McBride-Chang

Cheung

Wong

S. W.

(2013). General auditory processing, speech perception and phonological awareness skills in Chinese-English biliteracy. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01500.x

22.

Cutler

Weber

Otake

(2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.06.002

23.

Dupoux

Peperkamp

Sebastian-Galles

(2010). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress’ deafness’ in simultaneous French-Spanish bilinguals. Cognition, 114, 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.001

24.

Ernestus

(2014). Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua, 142, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.006

25.

Ernestus

Kouwenhoven

Van Mulken

(2017). The direct and indirect effects of the phonotactic constraints in the listener’s native language on the comprehension of reduced and unreduced word pronunciation variants in a foreign language. Journal of Phonetics, 62, 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.02.003

26.

Eslick

C. J.

Le Roux

Pottas

Geertsema

(2020). Phonological awareness and speech perception: Skills of Grade 1 English second language learners. Reading & Writing–Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v11i1.263

27.

Field

(2003). Promoting perception: Lexical segmentation in L2 listening. ELT Journal, 57(4), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.325

28.

Gao

Lyu

Lin

C. J. C.

(2021). Processing Mandarin tone 3 Sandhi at the morphosyntactic interface: Reduplication and lexical compounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713665

29.

Glaspey

A. M.

Wilson

J. J.

Reeder

J. D.

Tseng

W. C.

MacLeod

A. A.

(2022). Moving beyond single word acquisition of speech sounds to connected speech development with dynamic assessment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(2), 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00188

30.

Goldsworthy

C. L.

Pieretti

R. A.

(2012). Sourcebook of phonological awareness activities. Cengage Learning.

31.

Hivaprasad

Sadanandam

(2020). Identification of regional dialects of Telugu language using text independent speech processing models. International Journal of Speech Technology, 23, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-020-09678-y

32.

Hogan

Catts

Little

(2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: Implications for the assessment of phonological awareness. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/029)

33.

S.-H.

Bryant

(1997). Development of phonological awareness of Chinese children in Hong Kong. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025016322316

34.

Kennedy

Blanchet

(2014). Language awareness and perception of connected speech in a second language. Language Awareness, 23(1–2), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863904

35.

Lewis

Hoover

Choi

Stelmachowicz

(2010). The relationship between speech perception in noise and phonological awareness skills for children with normal hearing. Ear and Hearing, 31(6), 761. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e5d188

36.

Cheng

Kirby

J. R.

(2012). Phonological awareness and listening comprehension among Chinese English-immersion students. International Education, 41(2), 4–25.

37.

Kirby

J. R.

Cheng

Wade-Woolley

Qiang

(2012). Cognitive predictors of English reading achievement in Chinese English-immersion students. Reading Psychology, 33(5), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2010.528663

38.

Liao

C. H.

Georgiou

G. K.

Parrila

(2008). Rapid naming speed and Chinese character recognition. Reading & Writing, 21, 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9071-0

39.

Mayo

Scobbie

J. M.

Hewlett

Waters

(2003). The influence of phonemic awareness development on acoustic cue weighting strategies in children’s speech perception. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(5), 1184–1196. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/092)

40.

McBride-Chang

Tong

Shu

Wong

A. M. Y.

Leung

K. W.

Tardif

(2008). Syllable, phoneme, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430801917290

41.

Melby-Lervåg

Lervåg

(2011). Cross-linguistic transfer of oral language, decoding, phonological awareness and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01477.x

42.

Meng

Wynne

Lahiri

(2021). Representation of “T3 sandhi” in Mandarin: Significance of context. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36(6), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.1893769

43.

Mitterer

Tuinman

(2012). The role of native-language knowledge in the perception of casual speech in a second language. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00249

44.

Morrison

G. S.

(2002). Perception of English /i/ and /I/ by Japanese and Spanish listeners: Longitudinal results. In Proceedings of the North West Linguistics Conference 2002 (pp. 29–48). Simon Fraser University. https://summit.sfu.ca/item/320

45.

Pan

(2012). Characteristics of mandarin-speaking students’ English phonological processing development. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 6, 17–21.

46.

Pierrehumbert

(2016). Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050

47.

Potts

Shanks

D. R.

(2014). The benefit of generating errors during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 644–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033194

48.

Schneider

I. V.

Healy

F. A.

Bourne

Jr. (2002). What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2813

49.

Shi

(2014). Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners. International Journal of Audiology, 53(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.825052

50.

Sun

Branum-Martin

Peng

Tao

(2018). Phonology, orthography, and decoding skills within and across English and Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(5), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1466302

51.

Vloedgraven

Verhoeven

(2009). The nature of phonological awareness throughout the elementary grades: An item response theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.005

52.

Wong

S. W.

Leung

V. W.

Tsui

J. K.

Dealey

Cheung

(2021). Chinese ESL learners’ perceptual errors of English connected speech: Insights into listening comprehension. System, 98, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102480

53.

Wong

W. L.

Dealey

Leung

W. H.

Mok

P. K.

(2019). Production of English connected speech processes: An assessment of Cantonese ESL learners’ difficulties obtaining native-like speech. The Language Learning Journal, 49, 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1642372

54.

Wong

W. L.

Lin

C. Y.

Wong

S. Y.

Cheung

(2020). The differential effects of subtitles on the comprehension of native English connected speech varying in types and word familiarity. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020924378

55.

Wong

W. L.

Mok

Chung

Leung

Bishop

Chow Bonnie

(2017). Perception of native English reduced forms in Chinese learners: Its role in listening comprehension and its phonological correlates. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.273

56.

Wong

W. L. S.

Chow

B. W. Y.

S. H. C.

Waye

M. Y. M.

Bishop

D. V.

(2013, July 10–13). The interplay among speech, phonology and word recognition in Chinese children learning English as a second language [Conference session]. 20th Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading Conference, Hong Kong.

57.

Yasufuku

Doyle

(2021). Echoes of L1 syllable structure in L2 phoneme recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.515237

58.

Yow

Tan

Flynn

(2018). Code-switching as a marker of linguistic competence in bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000335