This study investigated how input modes (reading vs. listening) and learners’ perceptual learning style (visual vs. auditory) affected the incidental learning of collocations. A total of 182 college students were first assigned to either a visual or auditory group based on their performance on a perceptual learning style questionnaire. Each style group was subsequently subdivided into three groups who were exposed to a series of texts containing unfamiliar collocation items under one of the input conditions: written input, aural input, or no input. Results of the study indicated that both written and aural input led to gains in collocational knowledge, and aural input was more effective than written input. Furthermore, the study provided empirical evidence that there was a moderating role of perceptual learning style on incidental collocation learning. The auditory learners under aural input showed the highest rate of collocation learning among all treatment subgroups.
AjaA. M. S. (2022). The productive vocabulary of multimodal and unimodal English as a foreign language learners. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 4, 139–153.
2.
AlotaibiS.Pellicer-SánchezA.ConklinK. (2022). The effect of input modes and number of exposures on the learning of L2 binomials. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 173(1), 58–93.
3.
BoersF.DemecheleerM.CoxheadA.WebbS. (2014). Gauging the effects of exercises on verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 54–74.
4.
BoersF.WebbS. (2018). Teaching and learning collocation in adult second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 51(1), 77–89.
5.
BrownR.WaringR.DonkaewbuaS. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 136–163.
6.
BrutonA.LópezM. G.MesaR. E. (2011). Incidental L2 vocabulary learning: An impracticable term?TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 759–768.
7.
BybeeJ. (2002). Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 215–221.
8.
ChenY. (2021). Comparing incidental vocabulary learning from reading-only and reading-while-listening. System, 97, 102442.
9.
DangT. N. Y.LuC.WebbS. (2022). Incidental learning of collocations in an academic lecture through different input modes. Language Learning, 72(3), 728–764.
10.
FengY.WebbS. (2020). Learning vocabulary through reading, listening, and viewing: Which mode of input is most effective?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 499–523.
11.
GyllstadH.WolterB. (2016). Collocational processing in light of the phraseological continuum model: Does semantic transparency matter?Language Learning, 66(2), 296–323.
12.
HatamiS. (2015). Teaching formulaic sequences in the ESL classroom. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 112–129.
13.
HatamiS. (2018). Does perceptual learning style matching affect L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading?Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 102–125.
14.
HillF.TomkinsonB.HileyA.DobsonH. (2016). Learning style preferences: An examination of differences amongst students with different disciplinary backgrounds. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(2), 122–134.
15.
HsuL. (2016). An empirical examination of EFL learners’ perceptual learning styles and acceptance of ASR-based computer-assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 881–900.
16.
HulstijnJ. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. Cognition and Second Language Instruction, 258–286.
17.
JinZ.WebbS. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning through listening to teacher talk. The Modern Language Journal, 104(3), 550–566.
18.
KamE. F.LiuY. T.TsengW. T. (2020). Effects of modality preference and working memory capacity on captioned videos in enhancing L2 listening outcomes. ReCALL, 32(2), 213–230.
19.
LeeC.YeungA. S.IpT. (2016). Use of computer technology for English language learning: Do learning styles, gender, and age matter?Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1035–1051.
20.
LinP. M. (2012). Sound evidence: The missing piece of the jigsaw in formulaic language research. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 342–347.
21.
MohsenM. A.AlmudawisS. (2021). Second language vocabulary gains from listening versus reading comprehension input: A comparative study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50, 543–562.
22.
OxfordR. L. (2003, October). Language Learning Styles and Strategies: An Overview. Gala.
23.
PashlerH.McDanielM.RohrerD.BjorkR. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
24.
PaviaN.WebbS.FaezF. (2019). Incidental vocabulary learning through listening to songs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 745–768.
25.
Pellicer-SánchezA. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 97–130.
26.
Pellicer-SánchezA. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 381–402.
27.
PlonskyL.OswaldF. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912.
28.
PujadasG.MuñozC. (2019). Extensive viewing of captioned and subtitled TV series: A study of L2 vocabulary learning by adolescents. The Language Learning Journal, 47(4), 479–496.
29.
PulidoD. (2004). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity?Language Learning, 54(3), 469–523.
30.
RassaeiE. (2018). Computer-mediated textual and audio glosses, perceptual style and L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 657–675.
31.
RassaeiE. (2019). Computer-mediated text-based and audio-based corrective feedback, perceptual style and L2 development. System, 82, 97–110.
32.
RogowskyB. A.CalhounB. M.TallalP. (2015). Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 64.
33.
SaitoK.LiuY. (2022). Roles of collocation in L2 oral proficiency revisited: Different tasks, L1 vs. L2 raters, and cross-sectional vs. longitudinal analyses. Second Language Research, 38(3), 531–554.
34.
ShenM. Y. (2010). Effects of perceptual learning style preferences on L2 lexical inferencing. System, 38(4), 539–547.
35.
ShinH. W.SokS.DoJ. (2022). Role of individual differences in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through listening to stories: Metacognitive awareness and motivation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(4), 1669–1695.
36.
SiyanovaA.SchmittN. (2008). L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(3), 429–458.
37.
SlackN.NorwichB. (2007). Evaluating the reliability and validity of a learning styles inventory: A classroom-based study. Educational Research, 49(1), 51–63.
38.
SzudarskiP. (2012). Effects of meaning-and form-focused instruction on the acquisition of verb-noun collocations in L2 English. Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research, 1(2), 3–37.
39.
SzudarskiP.CarterR. (2016). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 245–265.
40.
TightD. G. (2010). Perceptual learning style matching and L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 60(4), 792–833.
41.
TsaiM. H. (2020). The effects of explicit instruction on L2 learners’ acquisition of verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research, 24(2), 138–162.
42.
TuzcuA. (2023). The effects of input mode in learning declarative and nondeclarative knowledge of L2 collocations. System, 113, 103006.
43.
Van ZeelandH.SchmittN. (2013). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41(3), 609–624.
44.
VidalK. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1), 219–258.
45.
VilkaitėL. (2017). Incidental acquisition of collocations in L2: Effects of adjacency and prior vocabulary knowledge. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(2), 248–277.
46.
VuD. V.NoreillieA. S.PetersE. (2023). Incidental collocation learning from reading-while-listening and captioned TV viewing and predictors of learning gains. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221151048
47.
VuD. V.PetersE. (2022a). Incidental learning of collocations from meaningful input: A longitudinal study into three reading modes and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(3), 685–707.
48.
VuD. V.PetersE. (2022b). Learning vocabulary from reading-only, reading-while-listening, and reading with textual input enhancement: Insights from Vietnamese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 53(1), 85–100.
49.
VuD. V.PetersE. (2023). A longitudinal study on the effect of mode of reading on incidental collocation learning and predictors of learning gains. Tesol Quarterly, 57(1), 5–32.
50.
WalkerC. P. (2011). A corpus-based study of the linguistic features and processes which influence the way collocations are formed: Some implications for the learning of collocations. Tesol Quarterly, 45(2), 291–312.
51.
WebbS.ChangA. C. S. (2022). How does mode of input affect the incidental learning of collocations?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 35–56.
52.
WebbS.NewtonJ.ChangA. (2013). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning, 63(1), 91–120.
53.
WongkhanP.ThienthongA. (2021). EFL learners’ acquisition of academic collocation and synonymy: Does their academic experience matter?RELC Journal, 52(3), 523–538.
54.
YamagataS.NakataT.RogersJ. (2023). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of verb-noun collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(2), 291–317.
55.
YehY.WangC. W. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21, 131–144.
