The paper introduces the Special Issue on Language Contact and Speaker Accommodation, which originates from the conference Phonetics and Phonology in Europe (PaPE) held at the University of Lecce, Italy, in 2019. It discusses the topics of language contact and speaker accommodation, summarizing the contributions included in the Special Issue, and arguing explicitly in favour of a unitary view of how both temporary and stable changes happen in (part of) the linguistic systems. Accommodation is seen as the same gradual and non-homogeneous process at play in different contact settings. In the introductory sections, a discussion is offered on various situations in which linguistic systems are in contact and on the main factors that may be at play; the following sections offer an overview of the papers included in the Special Issue, which focus on accommodation in L2 and heritage speakers as well as on the time dimension of dialect or language societal contact. Finally, accommodation is discussed as the same process that is at work in any interaction, that may modify temporarily or long-term the system of L2 learners and bilinguals (e.g., immigrants), that usually affects in the long-term the heritage speakers’ system, and that only in the long term can lead to language changes involving entire communities.
AllardR.LandryR. (1994). Subjective ethnolinguistic vitality: A comparison of two measures. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1994(108), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1994.108.117
2.
AuerP.HiskensF. (2005). The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. In AuerP.HinskensF.KerswillP. (Eds)., Dialect change: The convergence and divergence of dialects in contemporary societies (pp.335–337). Cambridge University Press.
3.
AuerP.HinskensF.KerswillP. (Eds.). (2005). Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages. Cambridge University Press.
4.
BabelM. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177–189.
5.
BakkerP.MousM. (Eds.) (1994). Mixed languages. 15 Case studies in language intertwining. IFOTT.
6.
BeaverDZeevatH. (2006). Accommodation. In RamchandG.ReissC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp.503–538). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7.
BestC. T.TylerM. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In BohnO.-S.MunroM. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins Publishing.
8.
BradacJ. J.HopperR.WiemannJ. M. (1989). Message effects. In BradacJ. J. (Ed.), Message effects in communication science (pp. 294–317). Sage.
9.
BradlowA. R.Akahane-YamadaRPisoniD. BTohkuraY. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception and Psychophysics61(5), 977–985.
10.
BruggemanL.CutlerA. (2020). No L1 privilege in talker adaptation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(3), 681–693.
11.
ButlerY. G. (2013). Bilingualism/multilingualism and second-language acquisition. In BhatiaT. K.RitchieW. C. (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (2nd ed., pp. 109–136). John Wiley.
12.
CargileA. C.GilesH. (1996). Intercultural communication training: Review, critique, and a new theoretical framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 19(1), 385–404.
13.
ChangC. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 249–268.
14.
CelataC. (2019). Phonological attrition. In SchmidM. S.KöpkeB. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language attrition (pp. 218–227). Oxford University Press.
15.
Danescu-Niculescu-MizilC.GamonM.DumaisS. (2011). Mark my words! Linguistic style accommodation in social media. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 745–754). Association for Computing Machinery.
16.
Delais-RoussarieE.PostB.AvanziM.ButhkeC.Di CristoA.FeldhausenI.JunS.-A.MartinP.MeisenburgT.RiallandA.Sichel-BazinR.YooH. (2015). Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French. In FrotaS.PrietoP. (Eds.), Intonation in romance (pp. 63–100). Oxford University Press.
17.
de LeeuwE.StockallL.Lazaridou-ChatzigogaD.Gorba MasipC. (2021). Illusory vowels in Spanish–English sequential bilinguals: Evidence that accurate L2 perception is neither necessary nor sufficient for accurate L2 production. Second Language Research, 37(4), 587–618.
18.
Estève-GibertN. J.SchaferA.HemforthB.PortesC.PozniakC.D’ImperioM. (2020). Empathy influences how listeners interpret intonation and meaning when words are ambiguous. Memory & Cognition, 48, 566–580.
19.
FarrarK.JonesM. C. (2002). Introduction. In FarrarK.JonesM. C. (Eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors (pp. 1–16). Mouton de Gruyter.
20.
EdwardsJ. (2010). Minority languages and group identity: Cases and categories. John Benjamins.
21.
EdwardsJ. (2013). Bilingualism and multilingualism: Some central concepts. In BathiaT. K.RitchieW. C. (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (2nd ed., pp. 5–25). John Wiley.
22.
FlegeJ. E.BohnO. (2021). The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) applied. In WaylandR. (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press.
23.
FowlerC. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3–28.
24.
FowlerC. A. (2014). Talking as doing: Language forms and public language. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 174–182.
25.
Gardner-ChlorosP. (1991). Language selection and switching. Oxford University Press.
26.
GilesH. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87–109.
27.
GilesH. (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities in context. Cambridge University Press.
28.
GilesH.PoweslandP. F. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. Academic Press.
29.
GilesH.CouplandN.CouplandJ. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In GilesH.CouplandJ.CouplandN. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press; Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
30.
GilesH.WillemynsM.GalloisC.AndersonM. C. ( 2007 ). Accommodating a new frontier: The context of law enforcement. In FiedlerK. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 129–162). Psychology Press.
31.
GilesH.ReidS. A.HarwoodJ. (2010). Introducing the dynamics of intergroup communication. In GilesH.ReidS.HarwoodJ. (Eds.), The dynamics of intergroup communication (pp. 1–14). Peter Lang Publishing.
32.
GoldE.FrenchP.HarrisonP. (2013). Clicking behavior as a possible speaker discriminant in English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 339–349.
33.
GoldingerS. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279.
34.
GregoryS. W. (1983). A quantitative analysis of temporal symmetry in microsocial relations. American Sociological Review, 48, 129–135.
35.
GregoryS. W. (1986). Social psychological implications of voice frequency correlations: Analyzing conversation partner adaption by computer. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 237–246.
36.
GregoryS. W.WebsterS. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1231–1240.
37.
GrosjeanF. (2004). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. In BathiaT. K.RitchieW. (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism (pp. 32–63). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
38.
HarringtonJ.SchielF. (2017). /u/-fronting and agent-based modeling: The relationship between the origin and spread of sound change. Language, 93(2), 414–445.
39.
HarringtonJ.KleberF.ReuboldU.SchielF.StevensM. (2018). Linking cognitive and social aspects of sound change using agent-based modeling. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 707–728.
40.
HinskensF.AuerP.KerswillP. (2005). The study of dialect convergence and divergence: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In AuerP.HinskensF.KerswillP. (Eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages (pp. 1–50). Cambridge University Press.
41.
JohnsonK. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In JohnsonK.MullennixJ. W. (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–165). Academic Press.
42.
JohnsonK. (2006). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 485–499.
43.
JunS. A.BishopJ. (2015). Priming implicit prosody: Prosodic boundaries and individual differences. Language and Speech, 58(4), 459–473.
44.
KerswillP. E. (2002). Koineization and accommodation. In ChambersJ. K.TrudgillP.Schilling-EstesN. (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 669–702). Blackwell.
45.
KongE. J.LeeH. (2018). Attentional modulation and individual differences in explaining the changing role of fundamental frequency in Korean laryngeal stop perception. Language and Speech, 61, 384–408.
46.
LabovW. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Center for Applied Linguistics.
47.
Le PageR. B.Tabouret-KellerA. (1985). Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge University Press.
48.
LevitanR.HirschbergJ. (2011). Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH-2011 (pp. 3081–3084). Indian Science Congress Association.
49.
LewandowskiN. (2012). Talent in nonnative phonetic convergence [Doctoral Dissertation]. Institut fürMaschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart.
50.
LewandowskiN.JilkaM. (2019). Phonetic convergence, language talent, personality & attention. Frontiers in Communication, 4, Article 18.
51.
LibermanA. M.MattinglyI. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36.
52.
MilroyL.MuyskenP. (Eds.). (1995). One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.
53.
MontrulS. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. John Benjamins.
54.
MontrulS. (2013). Bilingualism and the heritage language speaker. In BhatiaT. K.RitchieW. C. (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 168–188). Wiley.
55.
MontrulS. (2016). The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge University Press.
56.
MontrulS.PolinskyM. (2019). Introduction to heritage language development. In SchmidM.KöpkeB. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language attrition (pp. 419–433). Oxford University Press.
57.
MuyskenP. (1981). Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In HighfieldA.ValdmanA. (Eds.), Historicity and variation in Creole studies (pp. 52–78). Karoma.
58.
NichollsJ. (2003). Diversity and stability in language. In JosephB. D.JandaR. D. (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 283–310). Blackwell.
59.
NiedzielskiN.GilesH. (1996). Linguistic accommodation. In GoeblH.NeldeP. H.StaryZ.WölckW. (Eds.), Kontaktlinguistik—Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 332–342). De Gruyter Mouton.
60.
NishiK.Kewley-PortD. (2008). Nonnative speech perception training using vowel subsets: Effects of vowels in sets and order of training. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 51(6), 1480–1493.
61.
OrricoR.D’ImperioM. (2020). Individual empathy levels affect gradual intonation-meaning mapping: The case of biased questions in Salerno Italian. Laboratory Phonology, 11(1), Article 238. https://doi.org/10.5334/LABPHON.238
62.
OstrandR.ChodroffE. (2021). It’s alignment all the way down, but not all the way up: Speakers align on some features but not others within a dialogue. Journal of Phonetics, 88, 101074.
63.
PardoJ.S. (2012). Reflections of phonetic convergence: Speech perception does not mirror speech production. Language & Linguistic Compass, 6, 753–767.
64.
PardoJ. S. (2016). Catching the drift: Carol A. Fowler on phonetic variation and imitation. Ecological Psychology, 28(3), 171–175.
65.
PardoJ. S.Cajori JayI.HoshinoR.HasbunS. M.Sowemimo-CokerC.KraussR. M. (2013). The influence of role switching on phonetic convergence in conversation. Discourse Processes, 50, 276–300.
66.
PardoJ. S.JordanK.MallariR.ScanlonC.LewandowskiE. (2013). Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures. Journal of Memory & Language, 69, 183–195.
67.
PardoJ. S.UrmancheA.WilmanS.WienerJ. (2017). Phonetic convergence across multiple measures and model talkers. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(2), 637–659.
68.
PickeringM. J.GarrodS. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–190.
69.
PickeringM. J.GarrodS. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 36, 49–64.
70.
PickeringM. J.GarrodS. (2021). Understanding dialogue: Language use and social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
71.
PierrehumbertJ. B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In BybeeJ.HopperP. (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 137–158). John Benjamins.
72.
PierrehumbertJ. B. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. Laboratory Phonology, VII, 101–140.
73.
PiskeT.MacKayI.FlegeJ. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.
74.
RomaineS. (2013). The bilingual and multilingual community. In BathiaT. K.RitchieW. C. (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (2nd ed., pp. 445–465). John Wiley.
75.
RomeraM.ElordietaG. (2013). Prosodic accommodation in language contact: Spanish intonation in Majorca. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 221, 127–151.
76.
RomoliJ.SauerlandU. (2017). Presupposition and accommodation. In BarronA.GuY.SteenG. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of pragmatics (Vol. 21, pp. 257–276). Taylor & Francis.
77.
RossJ. P.LilleyK. D.ClopperC. G.PardoJ. S.LeviS. V. (2021). Effects of dialect-specific features and familiarity on cross-dialect phonetic convergence. Journal of Phonetics, 86, 101041.
78.
SachdevI.GilesH.PauwelsA. (2013). Accommodating multilinguality. In BathiaT. K.RitchieW. C. (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (2nd ed., pp. 391–416). John Wiley.
79.
SancierM. L.FowlerC. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 421–436.
80.
SchmidM. S.KöpkeB. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford handbook of language attrition. University Press.
81.
SchweitzerA.LewandowskiN. (2013). Convergence of articulation rate in speech. Proceedings from INTERSPEECH, 2013, 525–529.
82.
ShockleyK.SabadiniL.FowlerC. A. (2004). Imitation in shadowing words. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 66, 422–429.
83.
SimonetM. (2011). Intonational convergence in language contact: Utterance final contours in Catalan-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41, 185–205.
84.
StewartJ.MeakinsF. (2021). Advances in mixed language phonology: An overview of three case studies. In MazzoliM.SippolaE. (Eds.), New perspectives on mixed languages: From core to fringe. language contact and bilingualism (pp. 1–26). De Gruyter Mouton.
85.
TajfelH. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
86.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–17). Nelson Hall.
87.
ThomasonS. (2001). Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press & Georgetown University Press.
88.
TrudgillP. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the Urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1, 179–195.
89.
TrudgillP. J. (1986). Dialects in contact. Blackwell.
90.
TrudgillP. J. (2008). Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: On the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation. Language in Society, 37(2), 241–254.
91.
TrudgillP. J. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.
92.
YuA. C.GroveJ.MartinovicM.SondereggerM. (2011). Effects of working memory capacity and “autistic” traits on phonotactic effects in speech perception. In Proceedings of the XVIIth international congress of phonetic sciences, 2236–2239.
93.
WagnerM. A.BroersmaM.McQueenJ. M.DhaeneS.LemhöferK. (2021). Phonetic convergence to non-native speech: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of Phonetics, 88, 1–20.
94.
WangXMunroJ. (2004). Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts. System,System32(4), 539–552.
