English Vowel Discrimination and Perceptual Assimilation by Japanese Listeners

Abstract

This study examined whether the discrimination accuracy of nonnative vowels could be predicted by how listeners assimilate nonnative phones into their L1. The results demonstrated that Japanese listeners discriminated between English /æ/ and /ʌ/ better than they did between /ɑ/ and /ʌ/, although they categorized all those stimuli as the Japanese /a/. Given that the acoustic distance between stimuli was controlled to be identical, this result was attributed not to the acoustic difference but to the category-goodness difference. The goodness-of-fit to the Japanese /a/ phoneme differed between the English /æ/ and /ʌ/ but not between the English /ɑ/ and /ʌ/, suggesting that it is more difficult to discriminate between vowels when the category-goodness difference between two nonnative stimuli is smaller. In addition, this study examined the relationship between perceptual assimilation and the focalization effect. Focalization affects directional asymmetry in a manner that renders detecting a sound change from a more-focal to a less-focal vowel more difficult than detecting a change in the opposite direction. The results demonstrated that this directional asymmetry is only observed when listeners assimilate two nonnative phones into a single L1 phonemic category, with no category-goodness difference between the two nonnative phones.

Keywords

Nonnative vowel perception discriminability perceptual assimilation directional asymmetry focalization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barr

D. J.

Levy

Scheepers

Tily

H. J.

(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

Best

C. T.

(1994a). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In Goodman

J. C.

Nusbaum

H. C.

(Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sound to spoken words (pp. 167–224). MIT Press.

Best

C. T.

(1994b). Learning to perceive the sound pattern of English. In Rovee-Collie

Lipsitt

L. P.

(Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 8, pp. 217–304). Ablex Publishers.

Best

C. T.

(1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In Strange

(Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). York Press.

Best

C. T.

McRoberts

G. W.

(2003). Infant perception of non-native consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways. Language and Speech, 46(2–3), 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460020701

Best

C. T.

McRoberts

G. W.

Goodell

(2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1332378

Best

C. T.

Strange

(1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 305–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30637-0

Best

C. T.

Tyler

M. D.

(2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn

O.-S.

Munro

M. J.

(Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes

Boersma

Weenink

(2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.33 (6.0.33). http://www.praat.org/

10.

Bundgaard-Nielsen

R. L.

Baker

B. J.

Kroos

C. H.

Harvey

Best

C. T.

(2015). Discrimination of multiple coronal stop contrasts in Wubuy (Australia): A natural referent consonant account. PLOS ONE, 10(12), Article e0142054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142054

11.

Bundgaard-Nielsen

R. L.

Best

C. T.

Tyler

M. D.

(2011). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 433–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000040

12.

Dar

Keren-Portnoy

Vihman

(2018). An order effect in English infants’ discrimination of an Urdu affricate contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 67, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.12.002

13.

Escudero

Williams

(2011). Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Peruvian Spanish listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(1), EL1–EL7. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3525042

14.

Faris

M. M.

Best

C. T.

Tyler

M. D.

(2018). Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.05.003

15.

Grimaldi

Sisinni

Gili Fivela

Invitto

Resta

Alku

Brattico

(2014). Assimilation of L2 vowels to L1 phonemes governs L2 learning in adulthood: A behavioral and ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00279

16.

Guion

S. G.

Flege

J. E.

Akahane-Yamada

Pruitt

J. C.

(2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2711–2724. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428657

17.

Harnsberger

J. D.

(2001). On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(1), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1371758

18.

Hillenbrand

Getty

L. A.

Clark

M. J.

Wheeler

(1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3099–3111. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872

19.

Iverson

Kuhl

P. K.

(1995). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(1), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412280

20.

Kent

R. D.

Read

(2002). The acoustic analysis of speech (2nd ed.). Thomson Learning.

21.

Kuhl

P. K.

(1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212211

22.

Kuhl

P. K.

Williams

Lacerda

Stevens

Lindblom

(1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606–608. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736364

23.

Labov

Ash

Boberg

(2005). The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110167467

24.

Lengeris

(2009). Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: Evidence from the perception of Southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese. Phonetica, 66(3), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1159/000235659

25.

Levy

E. S.

(2009). On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults’ French vowel learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), 2670–2682. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3224715

26.

Masapollo

Polka

Ménard

(2015). Asymmetries in vowel perception: Effects of formant convergence and category “goodness.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), 2385–2385. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4920678

27.

Masapollo

Polka

Molnar

Ménard

(2017). Directional asymmetries reveal a universal bias in adult vowel perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(4), 2857–2869. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4981006

28.

Matuschek

Kliegl

Vasishth

Baayen

Bates

(2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001

29.

Mokari

P. G.

Werner

(2017). Perceptual assimilation predicts acquisition of foreign language sounds: The case of Azerbaijani learners’ production and perception of Standard Southern British English vowels. Lingua, 185, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.07.008

30.

Polka

Bohn

O.-S.

(2003). Asymmetries in vowel perception. Speech Communication, 41(1), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00105-X

31.

Polka

Bohn

O.-S.

(2011). Natural Referent Vowel (NRV) framework: An emerging view of early phonetic development. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.007

32.

Polka

Masapollo

Menard

(2023). Asymmetries in vowel perception align with focalization patterns, not peripherality: Acoustic evidence from Canadian French /e/ and /ø/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153, Article A340. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0019079

33.

Schwartz

J. L.

Abry

Boë

L. J.

Ménard

Vallée

(2005). Asymmetries in vowel perception, in the context of the Dispersion- Focalisation Theory. Speech Communication, 45(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2004.12.001

34.

Shafer

V. L.

Kresh

Ito

Hisagi

Vidal

Higby

Castillo

Strange

(2021). The neural timecourse of American English vowel discrimination by Japanese, Russian and Spanish second-language learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24, 642–655. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000201

35.

Shport

I. A.

(2019). Perception of Vietnamese back vowels contrasting in rounding by English listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.12.003

36.

Strange

Akahane-Yamada

Kubo

Trent

S. A.

Nishi

Jenkins

J. J.

(1998). Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 26(4), 311–344. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1998.0078

37.

Sun

van Heuven

V. J.

(2007). Perceptual assimilation of English vowels by Chinese listeners: Can native-language interference be predicted? Linguistics in the Netherlands, 24, 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.24.15sun

38.

Takagi

(1993). Perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by adult Japanese learners of English: A unified view [University of California, Irvine]. http://search.proquest.com/dissertations/docview/304042958/fulltextPDF/14286C787BA778B2C85/1?accountid=14511

39.

Tsushima

Shiraki

Yoshida

Sasaki

(2003). On stimulus order effects in discrimination of nonnative consonant contrasts. Acoustical Science and Technology, 24(6), 410–412. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.24.410

40.

Tyler

M. D.

(2021a). Perceived phonological overlap in second-language categories: The acquisition of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese native listeners. Languages, 6(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6010004

41.

Tyler

M. D.

(2021b). Phonetic and phonological influences on the discrimination of non-native phones. In Wayland

(Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 157–174). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.005.

42.

Tyler

M. D.

Best

C. T.

Faber

Levitt

A. G.

(2014). Perceptual assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel contrasts. Phonetica, 71(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356237