English listeners often struggle to perceive tones, but some are easier than others. This study examined these phenomena grounded in the feature weighing perspective (FWP) and the Perceptual Assimilation Model for Suprasegmentals (PAM-S). Forty-seven English and Cantonese listeners completed 4,212 trials of Cantonese tone discrimination and sequence recall tasks. The English listeners showed asymmetrical perceptual patterns of discrimination but not sequence recall. Specifically, these English listeners discriminated T1–T5, T3–T5, and T4–T5 more accurately than T1–T4, T3–T4, and T1–T3. However, they recalled the contour tone and level tone sequences with similar accuracies. Results of the discrimination task aligned with the predictions of PAM-S but not FWP. However, results of the sequence recall task did not support PAM-S. Together, these results suggest that PAM-S only applies to simple discrimination, not abstract phonological processing with a high memory load.
AoyamaK. (2003). Perception of syllable-initial and syllable-final nasals in English by Korean and Japanese speakers. Second Language Research, 19(3), 251–265.
3.
BenjaminiY.KriegerA. M.YekutieliD. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93, 491–507.
4.
BertsekasD. P. (2014). Constrained optimization and Lagrange multiplier methods. Academic.
5.
BestC. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In GoodmanJ. C.NusbaumH. C (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). MIT Press.
6.
BestC. T.HalléP. A. (2010). Perception of initial obstruent voicing is influenced by gestural organization. Journal of Phonetics, 38(1), 109–126.
7.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2022). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.12. http://www.praat.org
8.
Bundgaard-NielsenR. L.BestC. T.TylerM. D. (2011). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 433–461.
9.
ChanR. K. W.LeungJ. H. C. (2020). Why are lexical tones difficult to learn? Insights from the incidental learning of tone-segment connections. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 33–59.
10.
CharltonC.RasbashJ.BrowneW. J.HealyM.CameronB. (2020). MLwiN Version 3.05. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
11.
ChoiW. (2020). The selectivity of musical advantage: Musicians exhibit perceptual advantage for some but not all Cantonese tones. Music Perception, 37(5), 423–434.
12.
ChoiW. (2022a). Theorizing positive transfer in cross-linguistic speech perception: The Acoustic-Attentional-Contextual hypothesis. Journal of Phonetics, 91, 101135.
13.
ChoiW. (2022b). Towards a native OPERA hypothesis: Musicianship and English stress perception. Language and Speech, 65(3), 697–712.
14.
ChoiW. (2022c). What is ‘music’ in music-to-language transfer? Musical ability but not musicianship supports Cantonese listeners’ English stress perception. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65, 4047–4059. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00175
15.
ChoiW.TongX.GuF.TongX.WongL. (2017). On the early neural perceptual integrality of tones and vowels. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 41, 11–23.
16.
ChoiW.TongX.SamuelA. G. (2019). Better than native: Tone language, experience enhances English lexical stress discrimination in Cantonese-English bilingual listeners. Cognition, 189, 188–192.
17.
ChoiW.TsuiK. Y. R. (in press). Perceptual integrality of foreign segmental and tonal information: Dimensional transfer hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
18.
CooperA.WangY. (2012). The influence of linguistic and musical experience on Cantonese word learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(6), 4756–4769.
19.
CorreiaS.ButlerJ.VigarioM.FrotaS. (2015). A stress “deafness” effect in European Portuguese. Language and Speech, 58(1), 48–67.
20.
CutlerA. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. MIT Press.
21.
DupouxE.PallierC.SebastianN.MehlerJ. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French?Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406–421.
22.
DupouxE.PeperkampS.Sebastian-GallesN. (2010). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress “deafness” in simultaneous French-Spanish bilinguals. Cognition, 114, 266–275.
23.
DupouxE.Sebastian-GallesN.NavarreteE.PeperkampS. (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682–706.
24.
EsserB. (1978). On the theory of resonance Raman scattering in disordered semiconductors. Physica Status Solidi, 89(2), 633–643.
25.
FrancisA. L.CioccaV.MaL.FennK. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 268–294.
26.
FungS. Y. R.LeeC. K. C. (2019). Voice quality and identity: The case of Hong Kong Cantonese. The Ohio State University.
27.
GandourJ. T. (1987). Tone perception in aphasia. In RyallsJ. (Ed.), Phonetic approaches to speech production in aphasia and related disorders (pp. 45–57). College-Hill.
28.
GandourJ. T.HarshmanR. A. (1978). Crosslanguage differences in tone perception: A multidimensional scaling investigation. Language and Speech, 21(1), 1–33.
29.
GerritsE.SchoutenM. (2004). Categorical perception depends on the discrimination task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 363–376.
30.
GötzA.YeungH. H.KrasotkinaA.SchwarzerG.HöhleB. (2018). Perceptual reorganization of lexical tones: Effects of age and experimental procedure. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 477.
31.
GuionS. G.PedersonE. (2007). Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In BohnO. S.MunroM. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 57–77). John Benjiamins.
32.
HalléP. A.BestC. T. (2007). Dental-to-velar perceptual assimilation: A cross-linguistic study of the perception of dental stop+/1/ clusters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 2899–2914.
33.
HalléP. A.ChangY. C.BestC. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 395–421.
34.
HoxJ. J.MoerbeekM.Van de SchootR. (2017). Multilevel analysisRoutledge.
35.
KanT. Y. R.SchmidM. (2019). Development of tonal discrimination in young heritage speakers of Cantonese. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 40–54.
36.
KennedyP. (2008). Guide to econometrics. Wiley-Blackwell.
37.
KimH.TremblayA. (2021). Korean listeners; processing of suprasegmental lexical contrasts in Korean and English: A cue-based transfer approach. Journal of Phonetics, 87, 101059.
38.
KonstantopoulosS. (2008). The power of the test in three-level cluster randomized designs. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 66–88.
39.
LadefogedP. (2006). A course in phonetics. Thomson Wadsworth Corporation.
40.
LeeY. S.VakochD. A.WurmL. H. (1996). Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(5), 527–542.
LiuL.KagerR. (2014). Perception of tones by infants learning a non-tone language. Cognition, 133(2), 385–394.
43.
MattockK.BurnhamD. (2006). Chinese and English infants’ tone perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization. Infancy, 10(3), 241–265.
44.
McGuireG. (2010). A brief primer on experimental designs for speech perception research. Laboratory Report, 77(1), 2–19.
45.
MokP.LiG. V.FungH. S. H. (2020). Development of phonetic contrasts in Cantonese tone acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63, 95–108.
46.
OuS. C. (2016). Perception of English lexical stress with a marked pitch accent by native speakers of Mandarin. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 14(2), 1–31.
47.
PatelA. D. (2010). Music, biological evolution, and the brain. Oxford University Press.
48.
PatelA. (2011). Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 142. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142
PollackI.PisoniD. (1971). On the comparison between identification and discrimination tests in speech perception. Psychonomic Science, 24(6), 299–300. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329012
51.
QinZ.MokP. (2011). Perception of Cantonese tones by Mandarin, English and French speakers. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) (pp. 1654–1657). Hong Kong.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
54.
ReidA.BurnhamD.KasisopaB.ReillyR.AttinaV.RattanasoneN. X.BestC. T. (2015). Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: The roles of language experience and visual information. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 571–591. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0791-3
55.
SinghL.FuC. S. (2016). A new view of language development: The acquisition of lexical tone. Child Development, 87(3), 834–854.
56.
SoC. K. (2010). Categorizing Mandarin tones into Japanese pitch-accent categories: The role of phonetic properties. In Proceedings of interspeech satellite workshop on second language studies. https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/pdfs/l2ws_2010/so10_l2ws.pdf
57.
SoC. K. (2012). Cross-language categorization of monosyllabic foreign tones: Effects of phonological and phonetic properties of native language. In StolzT.NauN.StrohC. (Eds.), Monosyllables: From phonology to typology (pp. 55–69). Akademie Verlag.
58.
SoC. K.BestC. T. (2008). Do English speakers assimilate Mandarin tones to English prosodic categories? In Proceedings of the 9th annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2008), incorporating the 12th Australasian international Conference on Speech Science and Technology (SST 2008) (p. 1120). International Speech Communication Association. https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2008/so08b_interspeech.html
59.
SoC. K.BestC. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.
60.
SoC. K.BestC. T. (2014). Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of Mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 195–221.
61.
TongX.LeeS. M. K.LeeM. M. L.BurnhamD. (2015). A tale of two features: Perception of Cantonese lexical tone and English lexical stress in Cantonese-English bilinguals. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0142896.
62.
TraunmüllerullerH.ErikssonA. (1994). The size of F0 excursions in speech production and perception. Working Papers, 43, 136–139.
63.
TylerM. D.BestC. T.GoldsteinL. M.AntoniouM. (2014). Investigating the role of articulatory organs and perceptual assimilation in infants’ discrimination of native and non-native fricative place contrasts. Developmental Psychobiology, 56(2), 210–227.
64.
WangY.SpenceM. M.JongmanA.SerenoJ. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(60), 3649–3658.
65.
WaylandR. P.GuionS. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681–712.
66.
WongP. C. M.PerrachioneT. K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 565–585.
67.
XuY. (1994). Production and perception of coarticulated tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2240–2253.
68.
XuY. (1997). Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 61–83.
69.
YeungH. H.ChenK. H.WerkerJ. F. (2013). When does native language input affect phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 123–139.
70.
YipM. (2002). Tone. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
71.
ZhengY.SamuelA. G. (2018). The effects of ethnicity, musicianship, and tone language experience on pitch perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 2627–2642.
