Are palatal consonants articulated by multiple tongue gestures (coronal and dorsal) or by a single gesture that brings the tongue into contact with the palate at several places of articulation? The lenition of palatal consonants (resulting in approximants) has been presented as evidence that palatals are simple, not complex: When reduced, they do not lose their coronal gesture and become dorsals; instead, they manifest reduced linguopalatal contact while retaining their anterior place of articulation. The frequently-reported deocclusivization of the Brazilian Portuguese (BP) palatal nasal may support this claim. However, the linguopalatal configuration of this sound has not been studied directly. Electropalatographic evidence from three speakers of BP (compared with data from three speakers of Peninsular Spanish) demonstrates that the palatal nasal is frequently realized as an approximant. There is no evidence of anterior occlusion in BP’s post-palatal, lenited nasal. Under conditions of focus/hyperarticulation, there is no evidence of stronger/more anterior occlusion. We argue that the articulatory target of the BP palatal nasal is neither occluded nor anterior.
AguiarM. de (1937). Fonética do português do Ceará [Phonetics of Portuguese of Ceará]. Revista do Instituto do Ceará, 51, 271–307.
2.
AlmeidaM. M. S. (2004). As consoantes do português falado no Vale do Cuiabá [The consonants of Portuguese spoken in Vale do Cuiabá]. Signum: Estudos da Linguagem, 7, 149–163.
3.
AragãoM. S. S. (1996). A despalatalização e consequente iotização no falar de Fortaleza [The depalatalization and consequent iodization in the speech of Fortaleza]. XIV Jornada de Estudos Linguísticos do GELNE. Natal: UFRN.
AzevedoM. (1981). A contrastive phonology of Portuguese and English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
6.
AzevedoM. (2002). Considerations on literary dialect in Spanish and Portuguese. Hispania, 85, 505–514.
7.
BaayenR. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BarbosaP. A.AlbanoE. C. (2004). Illustrations of the IPA: Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 34, 227–232.
9.
Borzone de ManriqueA. M. (1980). Manual de fonética acústica [Handbook of acoustic phonetics]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Hachette.
10.
BosqueI.Pérez FernándezM. (1987). Diccionario inverso de la lengua española [Inverse dictionary of the Spanish language]. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.
11.
BuchaillardS.PerrierP.PayanY. (2009). A biomechanical model of cardinal vowel production: Muscle activations and the impact of gravity on tongue positioning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 2033–2051.
12.
CarignanC.ShostedR.ShihC.RongP. (2011). Compensatory articulation in American English nasalized vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 668–682.
13.
ChoT.KeatingP. (2009). Effects of initial position versus prominence in English. Journal of Phonetics, 3, 466–485.
14.
Cruz-FerreiraM. (1997). Portuguese (European). In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (pp. 126–130). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
d’Andrade PardalE. (1993). Dicionário inverso do português [Inverse dictionary of Portuguese]. Lisbon, Portugal: Edições Cosmos.
16.
de JongK.ZawaydehB. (2002). Comparing stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus: Patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 53–75.
17.
EngwallO.DelvauxV.MetensT. (2006). Interspeaker variation in the articulation of nasal vowels. In YehiaH.DemolinD.LaboissièreR. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production (pp. 3–10). Ubatuba, Brazil: Centro de Estudos da Fala, Acústica, Linguagem e Música.
18.
Fernández PlanasA. M. (2000). Estudio electropalatográfico de la coarticulación vocálica en estructuras VCV en castellano [Electropalatographic study of vowel coarticulation in VCV structures in Spanish] (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat de Barcelona.
19.
Fernández PlanasA. M. (2009). Características linguopalatales de la nasal palatalizada en español [Linguopalatal characteristics of the palatalized nasal in Spanish]. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 18, 161–174.
20.
FontdevilaJ.PallarèsM. D.RecasensD. (1994). The contact index method of EPG data reduction. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 141–154.
21.
GibbonF. E.YuenI.LeeA.AdamsL. (2007). Normal adult speakers’ tongue palate contact patterns for alveolar oral and nasal stops. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 82–89.
22.
GueorguievaR.KrystalJ. H. (2004). Move over ANOVA: Progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 310–317.
23.
HajekJ. (1997). Universals of sound change in nasalization. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24.
HardcastleW. J. (1972). The use of electropalatography in phonetic research. Phonetica, 25, 197–215.
25.
HualdeJ. I. (2005). The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
KeatingP. A. (1988). Palatals as complex segments: X-ray evidence. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 69, 77–91.
KochetovA.ColantoniL. (2011). Coronal place contrasts in Argentine and Cuban Spanish: An electropalatographic study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41, 329–358.
29.
LahiriA.EversV. (1991). Palatalization and coronality. In ParadisC.PrunetJ.-F. (Eds.), The special status of coronals: Internal and external evidence (pp. 79–100). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30.
Leite de VasconcelosJ. (1901). Esquisse d’une dialectologie portugaise [Sketch of Portuguese dialectology]. Paris, France: Aillaud & Company.
31.
LipskiJ. M. (1975). Vowel nasalization in Brazilian Portuguese. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 20, 58–77.
32.
LipskiJ. M. (1989). Spanish yeísmo and the palatal resonants: Towards a unified analysis. Probus, 1, 211–224.
33.
LittellR. C.PendergastJ.NatarajanR. (2000). Modelling covariance structure in the analysis of repeated measures data. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1793–1819.
34.
Martínez CeldránE.Fernández PlanasA. M. (2007). Manual de fonética española: Articulaciones y sonidos del español [Handbook of Spanish phonetics: Spanish articulations and sounds]. Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.
35.
MartinsM. R. D. (1975). Vogais e consoantes do português: Estatística de ocorrência, duração e intensidade [Vowels and consonants of Portuguese: Frequency, duration and intensity statistics]. Boletim de Filologia, 24, 1–11.
36.
McCannJ.WrenchA. (2007). A new EPG protocol for assesssing DDK accuracy scores in children: A Down’s Syndrome study. In TrouvainJ.BarryW. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences XVI (pp. 1985–1988). Saarbrücken, Germany: Universität des Saarlandes.
37.
MillerR. G. (1981). Simultaneous statistical inference. New York, NY: Springer.
de OliveiraC. A. M. (2009). Do grafema ao gesto: contributos linguísticos para um sistema de síntese de base articulatória [From grapheme to gesture: Linguistic contributions to an articulatory-based synthesis system] (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade de Aveiro.
40.
ParkinsonS. (1979). The phonological analysis of nasal vowels in modern European Portuguese (Doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge.
41.
PeriniM. A. (2002). Modern Portuguese: A reference grammar. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
PinheiroJ. C.BatesD. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
43.
PinheiroN. L. A. (2009). O processo de variação das palatais lateral e nasal no português de Belo Horizonte [The process of variation of palatal laterals and nasals in Belo Horizonte Portuguese] (M. A. thesis). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
44.
PortR. F.CrawfordP. (1989). Incomplete neutralization and pragmatics in German. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 257–282.
45.
PruthiT.Espy-WilsonC. Y. (2004). Acoustic parameters for automatic detection of nasal manner. Speech Communication, 43, 225–239.
46.
PruthiT.Espy-WilsonC. Y.StoryB. H. (2007). Simulation and analysis of nasalized vowels based on magnetic resonance imaging data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 3858–3873.
47.
QuilisA. (1993). Tratado de fonética y fonología españolas [Treatise of Spanish phonetics and phonology]. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.
48.
R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing [http://www.R-project.org].
49.
RecasensD. (1984). Timing constraints and coarticulation: Alveolo-palatals and sequences of alveolar + [j] in Catalan. Phonetica, 41, 125–139.
50.
RecasensD. (1990). The articulatory characteristics of palatal consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 267–280.
51.
RecasensD.EspinosaA. (2006). Articulatory, positional and contextual characteristics of palatal consonants: Evidence from Majorcan Catalan. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 295–318.
52.
RecasensD.FarnetaniE.FontdevilaJ.PallarèsM. D. (1993). An electropalatographic study of alveolar and palatal consonants in Catalan and Italian. Language and Speech, 36, 213–234.
53.
RecasensD.FontdevilaJ.PallarèsM. D. (1995). A production and perception account of palatalization. In ConnellB.ArvanitiA. (Eds.), Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in laboratory phonology IV (pp. 265–281). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
RecasensD.RomeroJ. (1997). An EMMA study of segmental complexity in palatals and palatalized alveolars. Phonetica, 54, 43–58.
55.
RongP.KuehnD. P. (2010). The effect of articulatory placement on acoustic characteristics of nasalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 2543–2553.
56.
RubachJ. (2008). Palatal nasal decomposition in Slovene, Upper Sorbian and Polish. Journal of Linguistics, 44, 169–204.
57.
ScobbieJ.PouplierM. (2010). The role of syllable structure in external sandhi: An EPG study of vocalisation and retraction in word-final English /l/. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 240–259.
58.
ShostedR. (2006). Vocalic context as a condition for nasal coda emergence: Aerodynamic evidence. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 36, 39–58.
59.
ShostedR. (2011a). An articulatory-aerodynamic approach to stop excrescence. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 660–667.
60.
ShostedR. (2011b). Excrescent nasal codas in Brazilian Portuguese: An electropalatographic study. In LeeW.-S.ZeeE. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences XVII (pp. 1834–1837). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
61.
ShostedR.HualdeJ. I. (2010). The production and provenance of palatal nasals in Portuguese and Spanish. In ColinaS.OlarreaA.CarvalhoA. (Eds.), Selected papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) (pp. 43–62). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
62.
Silva NetoS. (1986). Introdução ao estudo da Língua Portuguesa no Brasil [Introduction to the study of Brazilian Portuguese] (5th ed.). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Presença.
63.
SimonP. (1970). A propos de la désarticulation de la consonne palatale dans la prononciation du français d’aujourd’hui [Regarding the decoupling of the palatal consonant in the pronunciation of contemporary French]. In StrakaG. (Ed.), Phonétique et linguistique romanes [Romance phonetics and linguistics], Volume 1 (pp. 67–98). Lyon, France: CNRS.
64.
SoaresE. P. M. (2002). Variações dos fonemas palatais lateral e nasal no falar de Marabá–PA [Variation of lateral and nasal palatala phonemes in the speech of Marabá-PA] (M. A. thesis). Universidade Federal do Pará.
65.
StevensK. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
StrakaG. (1979). Naissance et disparition des consonnes palatales dans l’évolution du latin au français [Genesis and disappearance of palatal consonants in the evolution from Latin to French]. In StrakaG. (Ed.), Les sons et les mots [Sounds and words] (pp. 295–345). Paris, France: Klincksieck.
67.
WilliamsE. B. (1962). From Latin to Portuguese: Historical phonology and morphology of the Portuguese language (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
68.
YandellB. S. (1997). Practical data analysis for designed experiments. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
