This study reports an exploratory analysis of the age of arrival (AoA) effect on the production of second language (L2) prosody. Three groups of Mandarin-speaking immigrants (N = 10 in each group) with varying AoA in the United States and ten native speakers of English as controls participated in the study. All participants read a paragraph of English, and their speech samples were subjected to three prosodic analyses: speech and articulation rates, native speakers’ judgment of the prosody based on segment-filtered speech, and analyses of tones and prosodic groupings using the Mainstream American English Tones and Break Indices (MAE_ToBI) transcription conventions. The L2 groups also filled out a survey providing information about their demographic background, English input, and socio-psychological aspects of language learning. The results revealed that the AoA factor impacted different aspects of prosody to varying degrees. Group differences were statistically significant for speech rate, degree of foreign prosody, the frequency of pitch accents, and the frequency of high boundary tones (H-H%). However, group differences were not significant for articulation rate, prosodic groupings, and the rest of the ToBI-labeled phonological categories. Multiple regression analyses further confirmed the AoA effect on degree of foreign prosody, the frequency of pitch accents, and high boundary tones (H-H%); AoA remained a significant predictor controlling for the effects of other variables. However, speech rate was predicted by English media exposure and motivation variable but not by AoA.
Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. ( 1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529-555.
2.
Asher, J., & Garcia, R. ( 1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 53, 334-341.
3.
Audacity Team (2000). Audacity (Version 1.2.5) [Computer program]. Retrieved October 31, 2009 from http://audacity.sourceforge.net/
4.
Beckman, M.E. ( 1996). The parsing of prosody. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 17-67.
5.
Beckman, M.E., & Ayers-Elam, G. (1994). Guidelines for ToBI labeling . Retrieved October 31, 2009, from Ohio University Linguistics Department Website: http://www.ling.ohiostate.edu/research/phonetics/E_ToBI/singer_tobi.html
6.
Beckman, M.E., & Hirschberg, J. (1994). The ToBI annotation conventions. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University.
7.
Beckman, M.E., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 9-54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Beckman, M.E., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255-310.
9.
Birdsong, D. ( 2007). Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In O.-S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 99-116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. ( 2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.0.45) [Computer program]. Retrieved October 31, 2009 from http://www.praat.org/
11.
Boula de Mareüil, P., & Vieru-Dimulescu, B. (2006). The contribution of prosody to the perception of foreign accent. Phonetica, 63, 247-267.
12.
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. ( 2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure forAmerican English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 997-990.
13.
Chambers, F. ( 1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 4, 535-544.
14.
Chen, A., & Mennen, I. ( 2008). Encoding interrogativity intonationally in a second language . In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Speech Prosody. 6-9 May, Campinas, Brazil.
15.
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. ( 2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 989-999.
16.
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. ( 2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2862-2873.
17.
Elsendoorn, B. ( 1984). Tolerances of durational properties in British English vowels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Institute of Phonetics, University of Utrecht.
18.
Flege, J. ( 1979). Phonetic interference in second language acquisition . Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Linguistics , Indiana University, Bloomington .
19.
Flege, J., Frieda, E., Walley, A., & Randazza, L. ( 1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second-language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 20, 155-188.
20.
Flege, J.E., MacKay, I., & Meador, D. ( 1999). Native Italian speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 106, 2973-2987.
21.
Flege, J.E., Munro, M.J., & MacKay, I.R.A. (1995). Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication , 16, 1-26.
22.
Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G.H., & Liu, S. ( 1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78-104.
23.
Fougeron, C., & Jun, S.-A. (1998). Rate effects on French intonation: Prosodic organization and phonetic realization. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 45-69.
24.
Golinkoff, R.M. ( 1983). The transition from prelinguistic to linguistic communication . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
25.
Guion, S.G., Flege, J.E., Liu, S., & Yeni-Komshian, G. (2000). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 205-228.
26.
Guion, S., Flege, J., & Loftin, J. ( 2000). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 27-42.
27.
Hirschberg, J., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structuring of discourse. Proceedings of the 24th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, New York (pp. 126-144).
28.
Höhle, B., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Herold, B., Weissenborn, J., & Nazzi, T. ( 2009). The development of language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: Evidence from German and French. Infant Behavior and Development, 32, 262-274.
29.
Huang, B.H. ( 2009a). The earlier the better? Age effect on second language phonology and grammar. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Applied Linguistics, Chiayi , Taiwan (pp. 137-158).
30.
Huang, B.H. ( 2009b). Age-related effects on the acquisition of second language phonology and grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
31.
Jun, S.-A. ( 1993). The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. [Published in 1996, Garland Publishing Inc., New York.]
32.
Jun, S.-A., & Oh, M. ( 2000). Acquisition of second language intonation. Proceedings of International Conference on Spoken Language Processing , 4, 76-79.
33.
Jusczyk, P.W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. ( 1993). Preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675-687.
34.
Jusczyk, P.W., Friederici, A.D., Wessels, J.M.I., Svenkerud, V.Y., & Jusczyk, A.M. ( 1993). Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(3), 402-420.
35.
Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. ( 1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 159-207.
36.
Kjelgaard, D., & Speer, S. ( 1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 153-194.
37.
Ladd, D.R. ( 1996). Intonational phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Lehiste, I. ( 1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
Li, C.N., & Thompson, S.A. (1977). The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 4, 185-199.
40.
Liberman, M. ( 1975). The intonational system of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA .
41.
MacKay, I.R.A., Flege, J.E., & Imai, S. ( 2006). Evaluating the effects of chronological age and sentence duration on degree of perceived foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics , 27, 157-183.
42.
Magen, H. ( 1998). The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 381-400.
43.
MathWorks Inc. (2003). MATLAB version 6.5.1. Natick, MA.
44.
Mattock, K., & Burnham, D. ( 2006). Chinese and English infants’ tone perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization. Infancy, 10(3), 241-265.
45.
Millotte, S., Wales, R., & Christophe, A. (2007). Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 898-909.
46.
Moyer, A. ( 1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81-108.
47.
Munro, M.J. ( 1995). Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 17-34.
48.
Munro, M.J., & Derwing, T.M. ( 1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289-306.
49.
Munro, M., & Derwing, T. ( 2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 451-468.
50.
Nazzi, T., Iakimova, I., Bertoncini, J., Frédonie, S., & Alcantara, C. ( 2006). Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: Emerging evidence for cross-linguistic differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 283-299.
51.
Nazzi, T., Jusczyk, P.W., & Johnson, E.K. ( 2000). Language discrimination by English-learning 5-montholds: Effects of rhythm and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language , 43, 1-19.
52.
Oyama, S. ( 1973). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.
53.
Oyama, S. ( 1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 5, 261-283.
54.
Pennington, M.C. ( 1992). Discourse factors related to L2 phonological proficiency: An exploratory study. In J. Leather & A. James (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1992 Amsterdam Symposium on the acquisition of second-language speech (pp. 137-155).
55.
Pierrehumbert, J.B. ( 1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
56.
Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonation in the interpretation of discourse. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57.
Piller, I. ( 2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(2), 179-208.
58.
Piske, T., Flege, J., MacKay, I., & Meador, D. ( 2002). The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 59, 49-71.
59.
Piske, T., MacKay, I., & Flege, J. ( 2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191-215.
60.
Polka, L., & Werker, J.F. ( 1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 421-435.
61.
Price, P., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. ( 1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90(6), 2956-2970.
62.
Riggenbach, H. ( 1991). Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of non-native speaker conversations. Discourse Process, 14, 423-441.
63.
Ross, K., Ostendorf, M., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1992). Factors affecting pitch accent placement. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 365-368).
64.
Scovel, T. ( 1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. New York: Newbury House.
65.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A.E. ( 1996). A prosody tutorial for investigations of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 193-247.
66.
Skoruppa, K., Pons, F., Christophe, A., Bosch, L., Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Alves Limissuri , R., & Peperkamp, S. (2009). Language-specific stress perception by 9-month- old French and Spanish infants . Developmental Science, 12, 914-919.
67.
Tahta, S., Wood, M., & Loewenthal, K. (1981). Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to a second language . Language and Speech, 24, 265-272.
68.
Thompson, I. ( 1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning, 41, 177-204.
69.
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. ( 1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French . Applied Linguistics, 1, 84-119.
70.
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. ( 2006). Learning second-language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1-30.
71.
Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Mack, M., Sung, H., Bialystok, E., & Flege, J. ( 2004). Release bursts in English word-final voiceless stops: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of Korean adults’ and children’s speech production. Phonetica, 61, 67-83.
72.
Ueyama, M., & Jun, S.-A. (1998). Focus realization in Japanese English and Korean English intonation. Japanese and Korean Linguistics, 7, 629-645.
73.
Vicenik, C., & Sundara, M. ( 2008). Role of segmental and intonational cues in dialect discrimination . Poster presented at Acoustics ’08, the 155th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Paris , France.
74.
Wennerstrom, A. ( 1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 1- 25.
75.
Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. ( 1983). Developmental changes across childhood in the perception of nonnative speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology , 37, 278-286.
76.
Werker, J.F., & Tees, R.C. ( 1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization in the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49-63.
77.
Wightman, C.W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., & Price, P. ( 1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 1707-1717.
