This study investigates the use of prosodic cues for syntactic ambiguity resolution by first language (L1) and second language (L2) speakers. In a production experiment, sentences with relative clause attachment ambiguity were elicited in three language conditions: native English speakers’ L1 productions as well as Korean-English bilingual speakers’ L1 Korean and L2 English productions. The results show that English uses both boundary marking (pause) and relative word prominence (elevated pitch and intensity) for disambiguation, while Korean mainly relies on boundary marking (pre-boundary lengthening and pause). The bilingual speakers have learned to use the English phonological categories such as pitch accents for disambiguation, but their use of phonetic cues to realize these categories still differed from that of native English speakers. In addition, they did not show a significant use of boundary cues. These results are discussed in relation to the typological differences between the prosody of English and of Korean.
AllbrittonD. W.McKoonG.RatcliffR. (1996). Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 22, 714–735.
2.
AoyamaK.FlegeJ. E.GuionS. G.Akahane-YamadaR.YamadaT. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233–250.
3.
BackmanN. (1979). Intonation errors in second-language pronunciation of eight Spanish-speaking adults learning English. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 4(2), 239–265.
4.
BaekH.YunJ. (2018). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactically ambiguous phrases in Korean. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 88, 89–100.
5.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
6.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB. M.WalkerS. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
7.
BeckmanM. E.PierrehumbertJ. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309.
ChoT.KimJ.KimS. (2013). Preboundary lengthening and preaccentual shortening across syllables in a trisyllabic word in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(5), EL384–EL390.
10.
CliftonC.CarlsonK.FrazierL. (2002). Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech, 45(2), 87–114.
11.
CooperW. E.Paccia-CooperJ. (1980). Syntax and speech. Harvard University Press.
12.
DussiasP. E. (2003). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies on Second Language Acquisition, 25, 529–557.
13.
FlegeJ. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In StrangeW. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). York Press.
14.
FodorJ. D. (1998). Learning to parse?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 285–319.
15.
FodorJ. D. (2002). Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. In HirotaniM. (ed.), Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society32 (pp. 112–132).
16.
GeeJ. P.GrosjeanF. (1983). Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 411–458.
17.
HirschbergJ.AvesaniC. (1997). The role of prosody in disambiguating potentially ambiguous utterances in English and Italian. In BotinisA.KouroupetroglouG.CarayannisG. (eds.), Intonation: Theory, models and applications (pp. 189–192). ESCA.
18.
JacksonC. N.O’BrienM. G. (2011). The interaction between prosody and meaning in second language speech production. Unterrichtspraxis, 44(1), 1–11.
19.
JunS.-A. (2003). Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 219–249.
20.
JunS.-A. (2005a). Intonational phonology of Seoul Korean revisited. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 104, 14–25.
21.
JunS.-A. (2005b). Korean intonational phonology and prosodic transcription. In JunS.-A. (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 9–54). Oxford University Press.
22.
JunS.-A. (2014). Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. In JunS.-A. (ed.), Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 520–539). Oxford University Press.
23.
JunS.-A.BishopJ. (2015a). Priming implicit prosody: Prosodic boundaries and individual differences. Language and Speech, 58(4), 459–473.
24.
JunS.-A.BishopJ. (2015b). Prominence in relative clause attachment: Evidence from prosodic priming. In FrazierL.GibsonE. (eds.), Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence processing: Studies in honor of Janet Dean Fodor. vol. 46 of the Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics (pp. 217–240). Springer.
25.
JunS.-A.OhM. (1996). A prosodic analysis of three types of wh-phrases in Korean. Language and Speech, 39(1), 37–61.
26.
KangS.SpeerS. R. (2003). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic clause boundaries in Korean. In GardingG.TsujimuraM. (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 259–272).
27.
KimM.-J. (2002). Does Korean have adjectives. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 43, 71–89.
28.
KimY.-K. (1997). Agreement phrases in DP. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 1–24.
29.
KlattD. H. (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics, 3, 129–140.
30.
KraljicT.BrennanS. E. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee?Cognitive Psychology, 50, 194–231.
31.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.
32.
LeeA.XuY. (2012). Revisiting focus prosody in Japanese. In MaQ.DingH.HirstD. (eds.), Speech prosody 2012 (pp. 274–277).
33.
LeeE.-K.WatsonD. G. (2011). Effects of pitch accents in attachment ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 262–297.
34.
LeeY.WangB.ChenS.Adda-DeckerM.AmelotA.NambuS.LibermanM. (2015). A crosslinguistic study of prosodic focus. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 4754–4758.
35.
LeeY.-c.XuY. (2010). Phonetic realization of contrastive focus in Korean. Speech Prosody 2010, paper033, 1–4.
36.
MennenI. (2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In HermentS.Delais-RoussarieE.AvanziM. (eds.), Prosody and language in contact: L2 acquisition, attrition and languages in multilingual situations (pp. 171–188). Springer.
37.
O’BrienM.GutU. (2010). Phonological and phonetic realisation of different types of focus in L2 speech. In WrembelM.KulM.Dziubalska-KolaczykK. (eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New sounds 2010 (pp. 205–215). Peter Lang.
38.
O’BrienM. G.JacksonC. N.GardnerC. E. (2014). Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 27–70.
39.
PierrehumbertJ. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
40.
PierrehumbertJ. B.HirschbergJ. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In CohenP. R.MorganJ.PollackM. E. (eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271–311). MIT Press.
41.
PriceP.OstendorfM.Shattuck-HufnagelS.FongC. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90(6), 2956–2970.
42.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
43.
RiazantsevaA. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 497–526.
44.
SchaferA. J.CarterJ.CliftonJ.Charles FrazierL. (1996). Focus in relative clause construal. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 135–163.
45.
SchaferA. J.SpeerS. R.WarrenP. (2005). Prosodic influences on the production and comprehension of syntactic ambiguity in a game-based conversation task. In TrueswellJ. C.TanenhausM. K. (eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Psycholinguistic, linguistic, and computational perspectives on bridging the product and action tradition (pp. 209–225). MIT Press.
46.
ShenX. S. (1993). The use of prosody in disambiguation in Mandarin. Phonetica, 50, 261–271.
47.
SnedekerJ.TrueswellJ. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 103–130.
48.
SpeerS. R.KjelgaardM. M.DobrothK. M. (1996). The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 249–271.
49.
StraubK. (1996). Prosodic cues in syntactically ambiguous strings: An interactive speech planning mechanism. In The 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1640–1643).
50.
TrofimovichP.BakerW. (2006). Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of second language speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegments. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 251–276.
51.
TurkA. E.Shattuck-HufnagelS. (2007). Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 445–472.
52.
VendittiJ. J. (1994). The influence of syntax on prosodic structure in Japanese. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, 44, 191–223.
53.
VigárioM. (2003). Prosody and sentence disambiguation in European Portuguese. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 249–278.
54.
WagnerM.WatsonD. G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 905–945.
55.
WightmanC. W.Shattuck-HufnagelS.OstendorfM.PriceP. J. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(3), 1707–1717.
56.
WuW. L.XuY. (2010). Prosodic focus in Hong Kong Cantonese without post-focus compression. Speech Prosody 2010, paper040, 1–4.
57.
YangP.-L. (2010). English language proficiency and production of prosodic disambiguation: A preliminary study of Taiwanese English learners. English Language & Teaching, 34(3), 51–84.
