Lexical tone languages make up the majority of all known languages of the world, but the role of tone in lexical processing remains unclear. In the present study, four form priming experiments examined the role of Mandarin tones in constraining lexical activation and the time course of the activation. When a prime and a target were related directly in form (e.g., lou3 `hug' — lou2 `hall'), competitors that differed from the prime in tone failed to be activated, indicating the use of tonal information to distinguish between segmentally identical words. When a prime and a target were not form-related but were related through a third word that was not actually presented (e.g., lou3 `hug' — jian4zhu0 `building', where lou3 is form-related to lou2 `hall', which was semantically related to jian4zhu0), a mismatch in tone prevented activation of minimal tone pairs at 250ms interstimulus interval (ISI) but did not prevent activation at 50ms ISI. These results indicate that tonal information is used on-line to reduce the number of activated candidates, but does not prevent the minimal tone pairs from being activated in the early phase of lexical activation.
Andruski, J.E., Blumstein, S.E., & Burton, M. (1994). The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition, 52, 163-187.
2.
Chen, H.-C., & Cutler, A. (1996). Auditory priming in spoken and printed word recognition . In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp.77-81).Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
3.
Ching, Y.C. (1985). Lipreading Cantonese with voice pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, S39-40.
4.
Connine, C.M., Clifton, C., Jr., & Cutler, A. (1987). Effects of lexical stress on phonetic categorization . Phonetica, 44, 133-146.
5.
Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45, 207-228.
6.
Cutler, A. (1986). Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech, 29, 201-220.
7.
Cutler, A. (1997). The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing. Speech Communication, 21, 3-15.
8.
Cutler, A., & Chen, H.-C. (1995). Phonological similarity effects in Cantonese word recognition. Proceedings of the 13th international Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 106-109. Stockholm.
9.
Cutler, A., & Chen, H.-C. (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken word processing . Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 165-179.
10.
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech , 40, 141-201.
11.
Cutler, A., & van Donselaar, W. (2001). Voornaam is not a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech, 44, 171-195.
12.
Cutler, A., & Otake, T. (1999). Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1977-1988.
13.
Fox, R.A., & Unkefer, J. (1985). The effect of lexical status on the perception of tone. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 13, 69-90.
14.
Frauenfelder, U.H. (1996). Computational models of spoken word recognition . In T. Dijkstra & K. de Smedt (Eds.), Computational psycholinguistics: AI and connectionist models of human language processing (pp.114-138). London: Taylor and Francis.
15.
Gandour, J. (1983). Tone perception in far eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149-175.
16.
Ganong, W.F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110-125.
17.
Goldinger, S.D. (1999). Only the Shadower knows: Comment on Hamburger and Slowiaczek (1996). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 347-351.
18.
Goldinger, S.D., Luce, P.A., Pisoni, D.B., & Marcario, J.K. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1211-1238.
19.
Hamburger, M., & Slowiaczek, L.M. (1996). Phonological priming reflects lexical competition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 520-525.
20.
Hamburger, M., & Slowiaczek, L.M. (1999). On the role of bias in dissociated phonological priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 352-355.
21.
Kiriloff, C. (1969). On the auditory perception of tones in Mandarin . Phonetica, 20, 63 - 67.
22.
Lively, S.E., Pisoni, D.B., & Goldinger, S.D. (1994). Spoken word recognition. Research and theory. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 265-301). San Diego: Academic Press.
23.
Luce, P.A., & Pisoni, D.B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
24.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition . Cognition, 25, 71-102.
25.
McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
26.
McQueen, J.M. (1991). The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 433-443.
27.
McQueen, J.M., Dahan, D., & Cutler, A. (2003). Continuity and gradedness in speech processing . In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 39 - 78). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
28.
Mertus, J.A. (2000). The Brown Lab Interactive Speech System (BLISS) . Providence: Brown University .
29.
Monsell, S., & Hirsh, K.W. (1998). Competitor priming in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1495-1520.
30.
Norris, D.G. (1994). SHORTLIST: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
31.
Norris, D., McQueen, J.M., & Cutler, A. (2002). Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming . Memory & Cognition, 30, 399-411.
32.
Packard, J.L. (2000). The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Dewier, A. (1989). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects. Memory & Cognition, 17, 525-535.
34.
Radeau, M., Morais, J., & Segui, J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1297-1311.
35.
Schirmer, A., Tang, S.-L., Penney, T.B., Gunter, T.C., & Chen, H.-C. (2005). Brain responses to segmentally and tonally induced semantic violations in Cantonese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 17, 1-12.
36.
Slowiaczek, L.M., & Hamburger, M. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1239-1250.
37.
Slowiaczek, L.M., & Pisoni, D.B. (1986). Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 14, 230-237.
38.
Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastian-Galles, N., & Cutler, A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 412-432.
39.
Utman, J.A., Blumstein, S.E., & Sullivan, K. (2001). Mapping from sound to meaning: Reduced lexical activation in Broca's aphasics. Brain and Language, 79, 444-472.
40.
Wang, H. (1986). A frequency dictionary of Modern Chinese. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press .
41.
Ye, Y., & Connine, C.M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese: The role of tone information . Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 609-630.
42.
Yip, M., Leung, P.-Y., & Chen, H.-C. (1998). Phonological similarity effects in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Proceedings of ICSLP'98, 5, 2139-2142. Sydney, Australia.
43.
Yip, M. ( 2001). Phonological priming in Cantonese spoken-word processing . Psychologia, 44, 223 - 229.
44.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1994). Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 393-422.
45.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1995). Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes , 10, 545-600.
46.
Zwitserlood, P. (1996). Form priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 589-596.
