The theories of Pulgram (1970) suggest that if the vowel of a French syllable is open then it will induce syllable segmentation responses that result in the syllable being closed, and vice versa. After the empirical verification that our target French-speaking population was capable of distinguishing between mid-vowel aperture, we examined the relationship between vowel and syllable aperture in two segmentation experiments. Initial findings from a metalinguistic repetition task supported the hypothesis, revealing significant segmentation differences due to vowel aperture across a range of bi-syllabic stimuli. These findings were also supported in an additional online experiment, in which a fragment detection task revealed a syllabic cross-over interaction due to vowel aperture. Evidence from these experiments suggest that multiple, independent cues are used in French syllable segmentation, including vowel aperture.
Barnwell, T.P. (1970). An algorithm for segment duration in a reading machine context. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2.
Battye, A., Hintze, M.-A., & Rowlett, P. (2000). The French language today: A linguistic introduction (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
3.
Church, K.W. (1983). Phase structure parsing: A method for taking advantage of allophonic constraints. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
4.
Clements, G.N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification . In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 283-333). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Content, A., Meunier, C., Kearns, R.K., & Frauenfelder, U.H. (2001). Sequence detection in pseudowords in French: Where is the syllable effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 609-636.
6.
Cutler, A.Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385-400.
7.
De Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.
8.
Dupoux, E. (1993). The time course of prelexical processing: The syllabic hypothesis revisited. In G. Altmann & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 81-111). Hove , UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
Durand, J. (1990). Generative and non-linear phonology. London: Longman.
10.
Goslin, J., & Floccia, C. (2007). Comparing French syllabification in preliterate children and adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 341-367.
11.
Goslin, J., & Frauenfelder, U.H. (2001). Theoretical and human syllabification. Language and Speech, 44(4), 409-436.
12.
Hooper, J.B. (1972). The syllable in phonological theory. Language, 48, 525-540.
13.
Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable based generalisations in English phonology . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
14.
Laporte, E. (1993). Phonetic syllables in French: Combinations, structure, and formal definitions. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 41, 175-189.
15.
Leclercq, G., Content, A., & Frauenfelder, U.H. (2002, June). L'effet syllabique dans les mots et les pseudomots en français. Paper presented at JEP2002, Nancy.
16.
Malmberg, B. (1963). Structural linguistics and human communication: An introduction into the mechanism of language and the methodology of linguistics . Berlin: Springer.
17.
Mehler, J., Dommergues, J., Frauenfelder, U.H., & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 57-67.
18.
Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., & Segui, J. (1990). Constraining models of lexical access: The onset of word recognition. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 236-261). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
20.
Pulgram, E. (1970). Syllable, word, nexus, cursus. The Hague: Mouton.
21.
Rash, F. (2002). The German-Romance language borders in Switzerland . Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23, 112-136.
22.
Sebsastian-Galles, N., Dupoux, E., & Segui, J., & Mehler, J. (1992). Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish . Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 18-32.
23.
Selkirk, E.O. (1982). The syllable. In H. Van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part II). Dordrecht: Foris.
24.
Singy, P. (Ed.). (2002). Le Français parlé dans le domaine Francoprovençal: une réalit plurinationale . Bern: Peter Lang.
25.
Tranel, B. (1988). The sounds of French: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Treiman, R., & Danis, C. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 87-104.
27.
Umeda, N. (1975). Vowel duration inAmerican English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68(2): 434-445.
28.
Vennemann, T. (1988). Preference laws for syllable structure and explanation of sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
29.
Zwitserlood, P., Schriefers, H., Lahiri, A., & van Donselaar, W. (1993). The role of syllables in the perception of spoken Dutch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning , Memory and Cognition, 19, 260-271.
