A Comparison of Theoretical and Human Syllabification

Abstract

A review of phonological syllabification theory reveals considerable controversy, with a number of conflicting theories put forward to explain this process. In this study the performance of five, French specific, syllabification procedures were compared and contrasted both against each other, using lexical analysis, and against human syllable boundary placement, using a metalinguistic syllable repetition task. Lexical analysis revealed substantial, practical differences in the application of procedures, with disagreements rising along with consonant cluster complexity. Results from the syllable repetition task showed differences in participant's syllabification consistency due to experimental condition, that is, syllable onset or offset detection, and the consonant cluster used in the stimuli. Comparison between the predictions of syllabification procedures and human segmentation show greater agreement for procedures based upon phonotactic regularities than sonority. Furthermore, segmentation by maximizing the length of syllable onset, practiced in most procedures, was not reflected in our results. Instead participants preferred single consonant onsets, apart from the case of obstruent-liquid clusters, which are considered as a single indivisible unit.

Keywords

segmentation syllabification syllable

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Calmès, M. , & Pérennou, G. (1998). BDLex: A lexicon for spoken and written French . Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. 1129-1136.

Cheng, R. (1966). Mandarin phonological structure. Journal of Linguistics,2, 135-158.

Chomsky, N. , & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

Clements, G.N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification . In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 283-333), New York: Cambridge University Press.

Content, A. , Kearns, R.K. , & Frauenfelder, U. (in press). Boundaries versus onsets in syllabic segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language.

Content, A. , Mousty, P. , & Radeau, M. (1990). BRULEX: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. Manuscript of the Université Libre de Bruxelles.

Coursil, J. (1992). Grammaire Analytique du Français Contemporain. Essai d'Intelligence Artificielle et de Linguistique Générale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Caen.

Cutler, A. , Mehler, J. , Norris, D. , & Segui, J. (1986). The syllabl's differing role in the segmentationof French and English, Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385 - 400.

Dell, F. (1995). Consonant clusters and phonological syllables in French, Lingua,95, 5-26.

10.

Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation in French. In D. J. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), A survey of intonation systems (pp. 195 - 218), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Fallows, D. (1981). Experimental evidence for English syllabification and syllable structure. Journal of Linguistics, 17, 309-317.

12.

Floccia, C. , Goslin, J. , Bouketir, N. , & Bradmetz, J. (1999). Consonant cluster syllabification in preliterate children. Proceedings of the Second Linguistic Studies Workshop, 1999. Université de Nantes .

13.

Fudge, E.C. (1969). Syllables. Journal of Linguistics , 5, 253-286.

14.

Gillis, S. , & De Chutter, G. (1996). Intuitive syllabification: Universals and language specific constraints. Journal of Child Language, 23, 487-514.

15.

Goslin, J. , Content, A. , & Frauenfelder, U.H. (1999). Syllable segmentation: Are humans consistent? Proceedings of Eurospeech , 1999, Budapest, Vol.4, (pp.1683-1686).

16.

Hooper, J.B. (1972). The syllable in phonological theory. Language, 48, 525-540.

17.

Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

18.

Kohler, K.L. (1966). Is the syllable a phonetic universal? Journal of Linguistics, 2, 207-208.

19.

Laporte, E. (1993). Phonetic syllables in French: Combinations, structure, and formal definitions. Acta Linguistic a Hungarica, 41, 175-189.

20.

Lebrun, Y. (1966). Sur la syllabe, sommet de sonorité. Phonetica, 14, 1-15.

21.

Liberman, L.Y. , Shankweiler, D. , Fischer, F.W. , & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 18,201-212.

22.

Malmberg, B. (1963). Structural linguistics and human communication. An introduction into the mechanism of language and them ethodology of linguistics. New York Academic Press Inc., Berlin : Springer-Verlag.

23.

Mehler, J. , Dommergues, J. , Frauenfelder, U.H. , & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 57-67.

24.

Peereman, R. (1999). Syllabification: Solution basée sur l'echelle du consonicité. Internal report of the University of Bourgogne.

25.

Pulgram, E. (1970). Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus. The Hague: Mouton.

26.

Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.

27.

Selkirk, E.O. ( 1982). Syllables. In H. vander Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations(PartII) (pp. 337-383), Dordrecht: Foris.

28.

Selkirk, E.O. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory . In M. Aronoff & R. Oehrle (Eds.),Language sound structure: Studies in phonology presented to Morris Hall by his teacher and students , MIT Press, 107-136.

29.

Titone, D. , & Connine, C.M. (1997). Syllabification strategies in spoken word processing: Evidence from phonological priming. Psychological Research , 60, 251-253.

30.

Tranel, B. (1988). The sounds of French: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

31.

Treiman, R. , & Danis, C. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Journal of Memory and Language, 27,87-104.

32.

Treiman, R. , Gross, J. , & Cwikiel-Glavin, A. (1992). The syllabification of /s/ clusters in English. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 383-402.

33.

Treiman, R. , & Zukowski, A. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification . Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 66-85.

34.

Trubetzkoy, N.S. (1939 [1969 Translation]). Principles of Phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press .

35.

Vennemann, T. (1988). Preference laws for syllable structure and explanation of sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.