Inan SOV' strictly head-final language with otherwise relatively free wordorder such as Japanese, disambiguating information including verb information is not available until the end of a clause. In such a language, a sentence theoretically has numerous possible syntactic structures before the verb information becomes available. The current study investigated (1) whether syntactic computation takes place in an ambiguous sentence fragment in Japanese and (2) if and how information from constituents other than the verb is utilized.
Two experiments were conducted using automated, word-by-word visual presentations with a lexical decision task on an extrasentential target. The results suggest that syntactic computation takes place in Japanese before verb information becomes available. A strong preference was observedfor a simplex clause when three differently Case- marked arguments belonged to the same clause. The findings also indicate that information from surface Case marking is utilized productively' and when there is ambiguity in marking between arguments and adjuncts, the distinction is made before incorporating the constituents into the existing structure.
Babyonyshev, M., & Gibson, E. (1995). Processing overload in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 1-35.
2.
Babyonyshev, M., & Gibson, E. (1999). The complexity of nested structures in Japanese . Language, 75, 423-450.
3.
Bader, M., Meng, M., & Bayer, J. (1999). Informativity of symptoms and garden path strength . Poster presentedat Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Edinburgh, Scotland.
4.
Clifton, C., Jr., Speer, S., & Abney, S. (1991). Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 251-271.
5.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. (1990). The use of verb information in syntactic parsing: A comparison of evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555-568.
6.
Fischler, I., & Bloom, P.A.( 1985). Effects of constraint and validity of sentence contexts on lexical decisions. Memory and Cognition, 13, 128-139.
7.
Fodor, J., & Inoue, A. (1994). The diagnosis and cure of garden path. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 407-434.
8.
Fodor,J., & Inoue, A.( 1999). Syntactic features in reanalysis: Positive and negative symptoms. Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York .
9.
Fodor, J., & Inoue, A. (2000). Garden path diagnosis: Agreementand case. Language and Speech, 43(3), 261-273.
10.
Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model . Cognition, 6, 291-325.
13.
Garnsey, S., Yamashita, H., Ito, K., & McClure, M. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of Japanese sentence processing. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Edinburgh, Scotland .
14.
Gibson, E. (1991).A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Melon University'Pittsburgh, PA.
15.
Gibson, E., & Thomas, J. (1995). The processing complexity of center-embedded and self-embedded English structures. Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Goodman, G.O., McClelland, J.L., & Gibbs, R.W.( 1981). The role of syntactic context in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 9, 580-586.
17.
Gorrell, P.( 1987). Studies of human syntactic processing: Ranked-parallel versus serial models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
18.
Gorrell, P. (1989). Establishing the loci of serial and parallel effects in syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 18, 61-73.
19.
Hoji, H. (1985). Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
20.
Inoue, A. (1991). A comparative study of parsing in English and Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
21.
Inoue, A., & Fodor, J. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 9-62). Hillsdale : Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D. (1999). Prehead-driven parsing in head-final structures . Paper presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Edinburgh, Scotland.
23.
Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Kurzman, H. (1985). Studies in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
25.
Lewis, R. (1996). Interference in short- term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 93-116.
26.
Lukatela, G., Kostic, A., Feldman, L.B., & Turvey, M.T. (1983). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns. Memory and Cognition, 11, 59-63.
27.
McRae, K., Spivey- Knowlton, M.J., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension . Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283-312.
28.
Mazuka, R.( 1991). Processing of empty categories in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 215-232.
29.
Mazuka, R., & Lust, B. (1988). Why is Japanese not difficult to process? A proposal to integrate parameter setting in Universal Grammar and parsing. In J. Bevins & J. Carter (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS, 16, 333-356.
30.
Mazuka, R., & Lust, B. (1990). On parameter setting and parsing: Predictions for cross-linguistic differencesin adult and child processing. In L. Frazier & J. De Villiers (Eds.), Language processing and language acquisition (pp. 163-205). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31.
Meng, M., & Bader, M. ( 2000). Mode of disambiguation and garden-path strength: An investigation of subject-object ambiguities in German. Language and Speech, 43(1), 43-75.
32.
Nakayama, M. (in press). Sentence processing. In N. Tsujimura (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
33.
Pritchett, B. (1988). Garden-path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language, 64, 539-576.
34.
Pritchett, B. (1991). Head position and parsing ambiguity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 251-270.
35.
Richardson, D., & Spivey, M. (1999). On the resolution of syntactic alternatives in parallel: Race or arm wrestle?Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.
36.
Sadakane, K. (1992). On the nature of ni. Unpublished MA Thesis, The Ohio State University'Columbus, OH .
37.
Sadakane, K., & Koizumi, M. (1995). On the nature of the "dative" particle ni in Japanese . Linguistics, 33, 5-33.
38.
Scheepers, C., Hemforth, B., & Konieczny, L. (1998). Case assignment preferences in processing German object-object ambiguities?Poster presented at the Eleventh Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New Brunswick, NJ.
39.
Schwanenflugel, P.J., & Shoben, E.J.( 1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memoryand Cognition , 13, 232-252.
40.
Spivey, M., Fitneva, A., & Tabor, W. (1999). Teasing apart parallel and serial models of sentence processing: Evidence from speeded sentence completions. Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing , New York.
41.
Trueswell, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework of constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton & L. Frazier (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155-179). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
Traxler, M.J., & Pickering, M.J. ( 1996 ). Case marking in the parsing of complement sentences: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A, Human Experimental Psychology, 49 A (4), 991-1004.
43.
Uehara, K. (1997). Judgments of processing load in Japanese: The effect of NP-ga sequences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 26, 255-263.
44.
Wright, B., & Garrett, M. (1984). Lexical decision in sentences. Memory and Cognition, 12, 31-45.
45.
Yamashita, H. (1994). Processing of Japanese and Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University'Columbus, OH.
46.
Yamashita, H. (1997). The effects of word-order and Case-marking information on the processing of Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 163-188.
