The early phonological development of six normally developing children learning Finnish is reported. The primary focus is on their production of multisyllabic targets. The one-syllable and two-syllable forms found in the speech of children learning English has often been seen as a universal feature of early words. Later research has indicated that, for example, some children learning Japanese may produce word forms that contain three to five syllables already at the age of 15 months among the first fifty words. In Finnish long words are common and as expected, children targeted them already at the first word stage. However, they succeeded only after this stage had passed. Individual differences were extensive. Although the main tendency seems to reduce the last element of long words producing the SW1- pattern, important exceptions can be found so that the results do not provide strong support for a metrical template. The study also indicated that the segmental factor may influence the deletion pattern: the syllable that contained a stop was produced, regardless of its position.
Allen, G.D., & Hawkins, S. (1978). The development of phonological rhythm. In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds.), Syllables and segments (pp.173-185). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
2.
Allen, G.D., & Hawkins, S. (1980). Phonological rhythm: Definition and development . In G. H. Yeni- Komshian, J. F.. Kavanagh,& C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Childphonology, 1: Production(pp. 227 - 256). New York: Academic Press.
3.
Boisson-Bardies, B. de, Vihman, M.M., Roug-Hellichius, L., Durand, C., Landberg, I., & Arao, F. (1992). Material evidence of infant selection from the target language. In C.A. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications (pp. 369 - 391). Timonium, MD: York Press.
4.
Demuth, K., & Fee, J. (1995). Minimal words in early phonological development. Ms., Brown University andDalhousie University.
5.
Echols, C., & Newport, E. (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition, 2, 189-220.
6.
Fee, J. ( 1995). Two strategies in the acquisition of syllable and wordstructure .In E. V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 29 - 38). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
7.
Fikkert, P.( 1994).Onthe acquisition of prosodic structure. Dordrecht: Holland Instituteof Generative Linguistics .
8.
Gerken, L. (1994). A metrical template account of children's ' weak syllable omissions from multi-syllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21, 565-584.
9.
Grunwell, P. (1987). Clinical phonology (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall .
10.
Ingram, D. (1978). The role of syllable in phonological development . In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds.), Syllables and segments (pp.143-155). Ams terdam: North-Holland .
11.
Ingram, D. (1988). The acquisition of word-initial [v]. Language and Speech, 31, 77-85.
12.
Ingram, D. (1989). Phonological disability in children (2nd ed.). London: Whurr Publishers.
13.
Johnson, J.S., Lewis, L.B., & Hogan, J.C. (1997).A production limitation in syllable number: A longitudinal study of one child searly vocabulary. Journal of Child Language , 24, 327-349.
14.
Karlsson, F. (1983). Suomen kielen äänne-ja muotorakenne [Finnish phonology and morphology]. Porvoo, Helsinki , Juva: WSOY.
15.
Kehoe, M., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1997a). The acquisition of prosodic structure: An investigation of current accounts of childrens' prosodic development . Language, 73, 113-144.
16.
Kehoe, M., & Stoel-gammon, C. (1997b). Truncation patterns in English-speaking childrens' word production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 526-541.
17.
Kunnari, S. (1998). Syllable number in early words. In K. Heinänen & M. Lehtihalmes (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Nordic Child Language Symposium (pp.85-88). Oulu: Publications of the Department of Finnish, Saamiand Logopedics, 13.
18.
Laalo, K. (1994). Kaksitavuvaihe lapsen kielen kehityksessä [English summary: The two-syllable stage in language acquisition]. Virittäjä, 98, 430-448.
19.
Laaksonen, K., & Lieko, A. (1988). Suomen kielenäänne-ja muoto-oppi [Finnish phonology and morphology]. Loimaa: Oy Finn LecturaAb.
20.
Linell, P., & Jennische, M. (1980). Barns Uttalsutveckling [Speech Development of Children]. Lund: Liber Läromedel .
21.
Macken, M. (1980). Aspects of the acquisition of stop systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian , J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology, 1: Production (pp.143-168). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Macken, M. (1995). Phonological acquisition. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 671-696). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
23.
MacWhinney, B. (1985). Hungarian language acquisition as an exemplification of a general model of grammatical development. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The cross linguistic study of language acquisition, Volume 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1069- 1155). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
24.
Menn, L., & Stoel-gammon, C. (1995). Phonological development . In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.),The handbookof child language (pp.335-359). Oxford: Blackwell .
25.
Peters A. (1977). Language learning strategies: Does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language, 53,560-573.
26.
Peters, A. (1985). Language segmentation: Operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The cross linguistic study of language acquisition, Volume 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1029-1064). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Pye, C., Ingram, D., & List, H. (1987). A comparison of initial consonant acquisition in English and Quiché. In K. E. Nelson & A. van Kleeck (Eds.), children's language, Vol 6 (pp. 175-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Räisänen, A. (1977). Havainto jalastenkielestä [English summary: Observations on child language). Virittäjä, 79, 251-264.
29.
Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (1997). Learning to produce long words. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock, & R. Shillcock Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA'97 Conference on Language Acquisition(pp. 268 - 271). Edinburgh.
30.
Toivainen, J. (1994). Mistälapsialoittaakielensäopettelun? Lingvistisiälähtökohtia [Which linguistic units does the Finnish child begin with?]. Publication of the Finnish Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics , 14, 73-80.
31.
Toivainen, J. (1997). The acquisition of Finnish. In D.I Slobin (Ed.), The cross linguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 4. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
Tuomi, T. (1980). Reverse Dictionary of Modern Standard Finnish (2nd ed.). Hämeenlinna : SKS.
33.
Vihman, M.M. (1978). Consonant harmony: Its scope and function, in child language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp.281-334). Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
34.
Vihman, M.M. (1991). Ontogeny of phonetic gestures: Speech production . In I. G. Mattingly & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and motor theory of speech perception: Proceedings of a conference to honor Alvin M. Liberman (pp.69-84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Vihman, M.M. (1993). Variable path to early word production. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 61-82.
36.
Vihman, M.M. (1996). Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Oxford: Blackwell .
37.
Vihman, M.M., & Miller, R. (1988). Words and babble at the threshold of lexical acquisition . In M. D. Smith & J. L. Locke (Eds.), The emergent lexicon: The child's development of linguistic vocabulary (pp. 151-183). New York: Academic Press.
38.
Vihman, M.M., Depaolis, R.A., & Davis, B.L. (1998). Is there a "trochaic bias" in early word learning? Evidence from English and French. Child Development ,69, 933-947.
39.
Wijnen, F., Krikhaar, E., & Den Os, E. (1994). The (non) realization of unstressed elements in children's utterances: Evidencefor arhythmic constraint .Journal of Child Language, 21,59-83.
