This paper explores the early lexicons of nine infants acquiring English or French to determine the extent of systematicity in the early vocabulary, and how this changes over time. Network graphs are generated from the point of first word production in the dataset until age 30 months. Two measures of systematicity—mean path length and clustering coefficient—are analyzed to establish the extent to which the early productive lexicon consists of closely connected clusters of similar-sounding forms. Results show that early production is highly systematic when compared with random networks, but that the network becomes more dispersed as it increases in size. Connectivity within the network is consistently higher for infants’ actual productions when compared with the adult target forms, and this effect increases over time. This suggests a systematic approach to production over the course of early development.
AmaralL. A. N.ScalaA.BarthelemyM.StanleyH. E. (2011). Classes of small-world networks. In NewmanM.BarabásiA-LWattsD. J. (Eds.), The structure and dynamics of networks (pp. 207–210). Princeton University Press.
2.
AmatuniA.BergelsonE. (2017). Semantic networks generated from early linguistic input [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.1101/157701
3.
CsardiG.NepuszT. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695, 1–9. https://igraph.org
4.
DemuthK.CulbertsonJ.AlterJ. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis and coda licensing in the early acquisition of English. Language and Speech, 49(2), 137–174.
5.
DemuthK.TremblayA. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 99–127.
6.
DeucharM.QuayS. (2000). Bilingual acquisition: Theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford University Press.
7.
DingemanseM.BlasiD. E.LupyanG.ChristiansenM. H.MonaghanP. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
8.
DoneganP. (2013). Normal vowel development. In BallM. J.GibbonsF. E. (Eds.), Handbook of vowels and vowel disorders (pp. 24–60). Psychology Press.
9.
FensonL.DaleP. S.ReznickJ. S.BatesE.ThalD. J.PethickM.. . . StilesJ. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 1–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166093
10.
FourtassiA.BianY.FrankM. C. (2020). The growth of children’s semantic and phonological networks: Insight from 10 languages. Cognitive Science, 44(7), e12847. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12847
11.
GolbeckJ. (2013). Analyzing the social web. Elsevier Science & Technology.
KalinowskiJ.HanselL.VystrčilováM.EckerA.ManiN. (2024). The development of early phonological networks: An analysis of individual longitudinal vocabulary growth [Pre-print]. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xd5j3
15.
KentR. D.RountreyC. (2020). What acoustic studies tell us about vowels in developing and disordered speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(3), 1749–1778. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00178
16.
KirbyS.CornishH.SmithK. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707835105
17.
LaingC. (2019). Phonological motivation for the acquisition of onomatopoeia: An analysis of early words. Language Learning and Development, 15(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2019.1577138
18.
LaingC. (2024). Phonological networks and systematicity in early lexical acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 51(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001368
19.
LuefE. M. (2022). Growth algorithms in the phonological networks of second language learners: A replication of Siew and Vitevitch (2020a). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(12), e26–e44. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001248
MakM. H. C.TwitchellH. (2020). Evidence for preferential attachment: Words that are more well connected in semantic networks are better at acquiring new links in paired-associate learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(5), 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01773-0
22.
McCuneL.VihmanM. M. (2001). Early phonetic and lexical development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(3), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/054)
23.
MonaghanP. (2011). Design features of language emerge from general-purpose learning mechanisms. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 33, 2661–2666. https://doi.org/https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7q1736rb
24.
MonaghanP.ChristiansenM. H.FarmerT. A.FitnevaS. A. (2010). Measures of phonological typicality. The Mental Lexicon, 5(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.02mon
25.
NölleJ.StaibM.FusaroliR.TylénK. (2018). The emergence of systematicity: How environmental and communicative factors shape a novel communication system. Cognition, 181, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.014
26.
PriestlyT. M. S. (1977). One idiosyncratic strategy in the aquisition of phonology. Journal of Child Language, 4, 45–65.
27.
RavivL.ArnonI. (2018). Systematicity, but not compositionality: Examining the emergence of linguistic structure in children and adults using iterated learning. Cognition, 181, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.011
28.
RavivL.Heer KlootsM.de MeyerA. (2021). What makes a language easy to learn? A preregistered study on how systematic structure and community size affect language learnability. Cognition, 210, 104620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104620
29.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
30.
RoseY.MacWhinneyB. (2014). The PhonBank Project: Data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. In DurandJ.GutU.KristoffersenG. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology (pp. 380–401). Oxford University Press.
31.
SiewC. S. Q.VitevitchM. S. (2020). An investigation of network growth principles in the phonological language network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 2376–2394. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000876
32.
SóskuthyM. (2017). Generalised additive mixed models for dynamic analysis in linguistics: A practical introduction. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05339
33.
SteyversM.TenenbaumJ. B. (2005). The large-scale structure of semantic networks: Statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth. Cognitive Science, 29(1), 41–78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2901_3
34.
SzrederM. (2013). The acquisition of consonant clusters in polish: A case study. In VihmanM. M.Keren-PortnoyT. (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches and cross-linguistic evidence (pp. 343–361). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980503.016
VihmanM. M. (1993). Variable paths to early word production. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 61–82.
37.
VihmanM. M. (2016). Prosodic structures and templates in bilingual phonological development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000790
38.
VihmanM. M. (2019). Phonological templates in development. Oxford University Press.
VihmanM. M.Keren-PortnoyT. (2013). The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches, cross-linguistic evidence. In VihmanM. M.Keren-PortnoyT. (Eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole-word approaches and cross-linguistic evidence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980503.002
WattsD. J.StrogatzS. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.
43.
WielingM. (2018). Analyzing dynamic phonetic data using generalized additive mixed modeling: A tutorial focusing on articulatory differences between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 86–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.002
44.
WoodS. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 73(1), 3–36.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
