Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12
Antinociceptive and motor-blocking effects of epidurally administered diphenhydramine at different concentrations in conscious rabbits: a randomized–controlled trial
In this study we aimed to determine the optimal epidural dose and concentration of diphenhydramine (DPH) for prolonged analgesia while preserving motor function, comparing its effects with lidocaine. A single-blind, randomized–controlled trial was conducted with 32 healthy rabbits assigned to two experiments (2.5 ± 0.5 kg). Experiment 1 (n = 25) assessed optimal DPH doses (4, 8, 12, 18, 24 mg kg−1), while Experiment 2 (n = 15) compared DPH concentrations (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%) at 12 mg kg−1. Antinociceptive effects were measured using pinprick tests on the perineal and digital areas, and motor blockade was evaluated using a modified 4-point grading system for limb paralysis. The results showed that epidural administration of 10% DPH at 12 mg kg−1 provided profound analgesia, with hindlimb analgesia lasting 201 ± 2.5 min and motor blockade persisting for 157.2 ± 3.4 min. In contrast, 5% DPH resulted in 96 ± 15 min of analgesia and 5.2 ± 2.2 min of motor block. Lidocaine failed to provide effective digital analgesia. No significant difference was observed between 10% and 15% DPH in analgesic and motor effects. The motor blockade duration was consistently shorter than the antinociceptive effect. DPH demonstrated superior potency, and a prolonged, sensory-selective epidural block compared with lidocaine, minimizing motor blockade and the risk of akinesia-like analgesia. DPH (preferably >5%) offered effective and safe analgesia, making it a promising option for hindlimb analgesia in rabbits, reducing animal suffering and providing better outcomes than lidocaine.
StevensRASharrockNE.Chapter 69: Epidural anesthesia. In: BenzonHTRajaSNMolloyRE, et al. (eds) Essentials of pain medicine and regional anesthesia. 2nd ed.Philadelphia:
Churchill Livingstone, 2005, pp. 575–581.
2.
LiYHuCFanY, et al.
Epidural analgesia with amide local anesthetics, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor pain relief: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit2015;
21: 921–928. 20150329. DOI: 10.12659/msm.892276.
3.
MoracaRJSheldonDGThirlbyRC.The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice. Ann Surg2003;
238: 663–673. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000094300.36689.ad.
4.
DayTKSkardaRT.The pharmacology of local anesthetics. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract1991;
7: 489–500. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30482-0.
5.
LönnqvistPA.Adjuncts to caudal block in children—quo vadis?Br J Anaesth2005;
95: 431–433. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei221.
6.
CongedoESgrecciaMDe CosmoG.New drugs for epidural analgesia. Curr Drug Targets2009;
10: 696–706.
7.
GrobanL.Central Nervous System and Cardiac Effects From Long‐Acting Amide Local Anesthetic Toxicity in the Intact Animal Model. Regional Anesth Pain Med2003;
28: 3–11.
RumoreMMSchlichtingDA.Analgesic effects of antihistaminics. Life Sci1985;
36: 403–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(85)90252-8.
10.
RosenthalSRMinardD.
Experiments on histamine as the chemical mediator for cutaneous pain. J Exp Med1939;
70: 415–425. DOI: 10.1084/jem.70.4.415.
11.
BäumerWRoßbachK.Histamine as an immunomodulator. JDDG: J Dtsch Dermatol Ges2010;
8: 495–504.
12.
RossbachKNassensteinCGschwandtnerM, et al.
Histamine H1, H3 and H4 receptors are involved in pruritus. Neurosci2011;
190: 89–102.
13.
BäumerW.Histamine, serotonin, and their antagonists. In: RiviereJEPapichMG (eds) Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics.
New Delhi, India:
John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
14.
SkidgelRAKaplanAPErdösEG.Chapter 32: Histamine, bradykinin, and their antagonists. In: BruntonLLChabnerBAKnollmannBC (eds) Goodman & Gilman’s: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12th ed.
New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill Education, 2015.
15.
HungCHChuCCChenYC, et al.
Spinal anesthesia with diphenhydramine and pheniramine in rats. Eur J Pharmacol2011;
673: 20–24. 20111025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.10.019.
16.
GreenSMRothrockSGGorchynskiJ.Validation of diphenhydramine as a dermal local anesthetic. Ann Emerg Med1994;
23: 1284–1289.
17.
ChenYWTzengJIChenTY, et al.
Diphenhydramine produces local cutaneous analgesia in response to dorsal skin noxious stimuli in the rat. Fundam Clin Pharmacol2014;
28: 439–444.
18.
PozziAMuirWWTraversoF.Prevention of central sensitization and pain by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists. JAVMA2006;
228: 53–60.
19.
KhilnaniGKhilnaniAK.Inverse agonism and its therapeutic significance. Indian J Pharmacol2011;
43: 492.
20.
MohsenAYoshikawaTMiuraY, et al.
Mechanism of the histamine H3 receptor-mediated increase in exploratory locomotor activity and anxiety-like behaviours in mice. Neuropharmacol2014;
81: 188–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.02.003.
21.
YanaiKZhangDTashiroM, et al.
Positron emission tomography evaluation of sedative properties of antihistamines. Expert Opin Drug Saf2011;
10: 613–622. DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2011.562889.
22.
El-DidamonyAMMoustafaMA.Spectrophotometric determination of diphenhydramine hydrochloride in pharmaceutical preparations and biological fluids via ion-pair formation. Arab J Chem2010;
3: 265–270.
23.
ChungGHDi GirolamoNJohnS, et al.
Effect of preemptive topical application of lidocaine or prilocaine–lidocaine on successful catheterization of ear veins in New Zealand white rabbits. Vet Anaesth Analg2022;
49: 452–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2022.06.004.
24.
FlecknellPALilesJHWilliamsonHA.The use of lignocaine-prilocaine local anaesthetic cream for pain-free venepuncture in laboratory animals. Lab Anim1990;
24: 142–146. DOI: 10.1258/002367790780890121.
25.
SantosMALuceraTMHorrM, et al.
Comparative study on epidural administration of dexmedetomidine, dexmedetomidine-lidocaine or lidocaine in conscious rabbits. Lab Anim2021;
55: 341–349. 20210215. DOI: 10.1177/0023677221993156.
26.
MeredithA.BSAVA small animal formulary: part B: exotic pets.
India:
John Wiley & Sons, 2015;103.
27.
MeadSAAllenMJElsayedSAH, et al.
Evaluating the efficacy of a peripheral nerve simulator-guided brachial plexus block in rabbits undergoing orthopaedic surgery compared to systemic analgesia. Vet Sci2024;
11: 213.
28.
YamashitaAMatsumotoMMatsumotoS, et al.
A comparison of the neurotoxic effects on the spinal cord of tetracaine, lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine administered intrathecally in rabbits. Anesth Analg2003;
97: 512–519. 2003/07/23.
29.
SatoSBabaYTajimaK, et al.
Prolongation of epidural anesthesia in the rabbit with the use of a biodegradable copolymer paste containing lidocaine. Anesth Analg1995;
80: 97–101.
30.
HawkinsMG.Advances in exotic mammal clinical therapeutics. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract2015;
18: 323–337. 2015/04/23. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvex.2015.01.008.
31.
KimYSShinYKLeeC-S, et al.
Block of sodium currents in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons by diphenhydramine. Brain Res2000;
881: 190–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02860-2.
32.
RieveschlGGruhzitO. A toxicologic study of histamine antagonist beta-dimethylaminoethyl benzhydryl ether hydrochloride (benadryl). Federation proceedings1945; 150.
33.
GruhzitMand FiskenR.A toxicologic study of two histamine antagonists of the benzhydryl alkamine ether group. J Pharmacol Exp Ther1947;
89: 227–233.
34.
National Toxicology Program.
NTP Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of diphenhydramine hydrochloride (CAS No. 147-24-0) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (feed studies). Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser1989;
355: 1–176.
35.
CampbellBBaronofskyIDGoodRA.Effects of benadryl on anaphylactic and histamine shock in rabbits and guinea pigs. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med1947;
64: 281–283. DOI: 10.3181/00379727-64-15769.
36.
OngBHHidakaYKanekoY, et al.
Effects of a single-bolus bupivacaine injection into the coccygeal spinal canal of rabbits. J Vet Med Sci2020;
82: 197–203.
37.
HughesPDohertyMCharmanW.A rabbit model for the evaluation of epidurally administered local anaesthetic agents. Anaesth Intensive Care1993;
21: 298–303.
38.
GreenawayJBPartlowGDGonsholtNL, et al.
Anatomy of the lumbosacral spinal cord in rabbits. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc2001;
37: 27–34. 2001/02/24. DOI: 10.5326/15473317-37-1-27.
39.
HenkelG.Susceptibility of nerve fibers to local anesthesia: “size principle” challenged. Anesthesiology2001;
95: 5A–6A. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00003.
40.
BeckerDEReedKL.Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog2012;
59: 90–102.
41.
DugdaleA.Veterinary anaesthesia: principles to practice.Malaysia:
Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2010;292.
42.
HiguchiHAdachiYKazamaT.Factors affecting the spread and duration of epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine. Anesthesiol2004;
101: 451–460. 2004/07/28. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200408000-00027.
43.
SantosMAAPLuceraTMCHorrM, et al.
Comparative study on epidural administration of dexmedetomidine, dexmedetomidine–lidocaine or lidocaine in conscious rabbits. Lab Anim2021;
55: 341–349. DOI: 10.1177/0023677221993156.
SicariVZabboCP.Diphenhydramine.
Treasure Island (FL):
StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2023.
46.
GrimmKALamontLATranquilliWJ, et al. Veterinary anesthesia and analgesia: the fifth edition of Lumb and Jones.
Pondicherry, India:
John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
47.
O’ByrneSBarryMGCollinsWC, et al.
Plasma protein binding of lidocaine and warfarin in insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Clin Pharmacokinet1993;
24: 183–186. 1993/02/01. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199324020-00007.
48.
Abd El-RahmanMKAbou Al-AlameinAMAbdel-MoetyEM, et al.
Integrated gold-thiol based potentiometric sensors for in situ dual drug-protein binding studies on naproxen/diphenhydramine salts model. J Electrochem Soc2017;
164: H1013.
RumoreMSchlichtingD.Analgesic effects of antihistaminics. Life Sci1985;
36: 403–416.
51.
FöhrKJZellerKGeorgieffM, et al.
Open channel block of NMDA receptors by diphenhydramine. Neuropharmacol2015;
99: 459–470.
52.
PetrenkoABYamakuraTBabaH, et al.
The role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in pain: a review. Anesth Analg2003;
97: 1108–1116.
53.
ChizhBAHeadleyPMTzschentkeTM.NMDA receptor antagonists as analgesics: focus on the NR2B subtype. Trends Pharmacol Sci2001;
22: 636–642.
54.
PozziAMuirWWTraversoF.Prevention of central sensitization and pain by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists. J Am Vet Med Assoc2006;
228: 53–60.
55.
CovinoBG.Ultralong-acting local anesthetic agents. Anesthesiol1981;
54: 263–264. 1981/04/01. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198104000-00001.
56.
KrystalADRichelsonERothT.Review of the histamine system and the clinical effects of H1 antagonists: basis for a new model for understanding the effects of insomnia medications. Sleep Med Rev2013;
17: 263–272.
57.
MavroudakisNBrunkoENogueiraMC, et al.
Acute effects of diphenylhydantoin on peripheral and central somatosensory conduction. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol1991;
78: 263–266. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90042-3.
58.
IlfeldBMLeLTRamjohnJ, et al.
The effects of local anesthetic concentration and dose on continuous infraclavicular nerve blocks: a multicenter, randomized, observer-masked, controlled study. Anesth Analg2009;
108: 345–350. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818c7da5.
