In September 1962, President John F. Kennedy challenged Americans to send and return astronauts to the Moon by the close of the decade. So-called “moon shots” like the Apollo Program of the 1960s became emblematic of a new paradigm in federally-funded research and development: large in scale, ambitious in scope, technologically challenging, and most importantly public facing. The success of the moon landings, in turn, inspired federal policymakers to seek similarly ambitious moon shots in other domains including communications, energy, housing, and transportation. The moonshot paradigm, however, proved to be a poor fit when applied in civilian settings. Drawing upon original archival research, this paper details government-led efforts to implement high-speed passenger rail along the Northeast Corridor. The moonshot paradigm saddled this program in no-win scenarios, encouraging implementing agencies to overstate program benefits, underestimate their costs, and ignore technological complexity and risk.
HagleyRobert B. Watson professional papers, Box 3, Folder 16, Pennsylvania Railroad, “Speed restriction chart – New York to Washington”, 1965.
3.
Hagley Library Manuscripts and Archives (hereafter: Hagley), Robert B. Watson Professional Papers, Box 3, Folder 16, Pennsylvania Railroad, “Speed restriction chart - New York to Washington,” 1965.
4.
Hagley, Robert B. Watson Professional Papers, Box 1, Folder 11, US Department of Commerce, “Contract for the Operation of Maintenance of Test Cars for High Speed Train Operation,” 25 July 1966.
5.
Robert BHagley. Watson professional papers, Box 4, Folder 4, Robert Watson, “Northeast Corridor High Speed Train Evaluation Project, Coordinator’s Report No. 43”, 8 March 1968.
6.
Robert BHagley. Watson professional papers, Box 4, Folder 1, Robert Watson, “Memorandum to A.M. Schofield”, 23 March 1968.
7.
Robert BHagley. Watson professional papers, Box 7, Folder 11, Government-Industry Task Force, “Report on the Washington-New York high speed rail passenger service demonstration project”, 31 May 1968.
8.
Robert BHagleyWatson professional papers, Box 1, Folder 1, Letter from P.W. Scott and P.A. Gorman to John Volpe, “Chronology of experience with the Metroliner Project”, 19 Feburary 1970.
9.
Robert BHagley. Watson professional papers, Box 2, Folder 2, Robert Watson, “Memorandum to W.A. Mullen, The Metroliner Research and Development Program”, 5 June 1970.
10.
Robert BHagley. Watson professional papers, Box 2, Folder 5, Robert Watson, “Metroliner History”, 1970.
11.
Robert BHagley. Watson professional papers, Box 7, 14, Robert Watson, “A Metroliner Retrospective”, 31 May 1996.
12.
Published sources
13.
Anonymous, “Gremlins slow high-speed trains”, Business Week, 3 August 1968.
14.
Anonymous, “A hard way to run a railroad”, Business Week, 4 April 1970.
15.
BaerWalterJohnsonLelandMerrowEdward, “Government-Sponsored Demonstrations of New Technology”, Science196:4293 (1977), 950–957.
16.
BedingfieldRobert, “U.S. Envisions a Steel Turnpike of Rails for Northeast Corridor”, New York Times,20 December 1964.
17.
BuchwaldArt, “Journey into the Unknown”, Trains: The Magazine of Railroading, (April 1969, 35).
18.
ChaneyMichael, “United Aircraft’s Turbo Train: The Transfer of Aerospace Technology to Rail Transportation”, Railroad History154 (1986), 114–124.
19.
CharltonLinda, “Penn Central Is Granted Authority to Reorganized Under Bankruptcy Laws”, New York Times,22 June 1970.
20.
ErgasHenry, “Does Technology Policy Matter?”, in GuileBruceBrooksHarvey (eds), Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nations in the World Economy (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1987), 191–245.
21.
ForayD.MoweryD.C.NelsonR.R., “Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs?”, Research Policy41: 10 (2012), 1697–1702.
22.
FreedBenjaminPlottElaina, “The DC Insider’s Guide to the Acela”, The Washingtonian9 May 2018.
23.
GallamoreRobertMeyerJohn, American Railroads: Decline and Renaissance in the Twentieth Century (CambridgeMA: Harvard University Press, 2016).
24.
GottmanJean, Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard in the United States (New YorkNY: The Twentieth Century Fund, 1961).
25.
HoodChristopher, Shinkansen: From Bullet Train to Symbol of Modern Japan (London: Routledge, 2006).
26.
HughesAgathaHughesThomas (eds), The Systems Approach in Management and Engineering, World War II and After (CambridgeMA: MIT Press, 2000).
27.
HughesThomas, Rescuing Prometheus (New YorkNY: Vintage Books, 1998).
JasanoffSheilaKimSang-Hyun, “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea, Minerva47:2 (2009), 119–146.
JohnsonStephen, The Secret of Apollo: Systems Management in American and European Space Programs (BaltimoreMA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006).
32.
KainJohnMeyerJohnWohlMartin, The Urban Transportation Problem (CambridgeMA: Harvard University Press, 1965).
33.
KeelerTheodore, Railroads, Freight, and Public Policy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1983).
34.
KellyAndrewRoccoPhillip, “From ‘Trial and Error’ to major Reform: The Politics of Medicare Demonstration Projects”, Public Administration97:3 (2019), 621–638.
35.
LamoreauxNaomiKennethSokoloff (eds) Financing Innovation in the United States, 1870 to Present (CambridgeMA: MIT Press, 2007).
36.
LindseyRobert, “After 6 Months, Metroliner Seems to Be Way to Run a Railroad”, New York Times, 16 July 1969.
37.
LindseyRobert, “Mechanical Bugs Still Plague Metroliners After Year in Service”, New York Times, 16 January 1970.
38.
LovingRush, The Men Who Loved Trains: The Story of Men Who Battled Greed to Save an Ailing Industry (BloomingtonIN: Indiana University Press, 2008).
39.
MazzucatoMariana, “Mission-oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities”, Industrial and Corporate Change27:5 (2018), 803–815.
40.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Survey of Technology for High Speed Ground Transport, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce (CambridgeMA: MIT, 1965).
41.
MoweryDavid, “Military R&D”, in HallBRosenbergN (eds), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Amsterdam: North Holland, 2010), 1219–1256.
42.
National Academy of Sciences, Science and Technology in the Railroad Industry (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1963).
43.
NelsonRichard, The Moon and the Ghetto (New YorkNY: W.W. Norton & Company, 1977).
44.
Northeast Corridor Commission, Connect2035: A 15-Year Service Development Plan and Infrastructure Planning Process for the Northeast Corridor, Executive Summary (Washington, D.C.: NEC Commission, 2021), 8. Available at: https://nec-commission.com/app/uploads/2021/07/C35-Executive-Summary-Only.pdf (accessed on 30 October 2021).
45.
Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Advisory Commission, The Northeast Corridor and the American Economy (Washington, D.C.: Northeast Corridor Commission, 2014).
46.
PellClaiborne, Megalopolis Unbound: The Supercity and the Transportation of Tomorrow (New York: Praeger, 1966).
47.
Pennsylvania Railroad Co. – Merger – New York Central Railroad Co., 327 I.C.C. 475 (1966).
48.
PerlAnthony, New Departures: Rethinking Rail Passenger Policy in the Twenty-First Century (LexingtonKY: University Press of Kentucky, 2002).
49.
PetermanDavid RandallFritelliJohnMalletWilliam, High Speed Rail (HSR) in the United States (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, 2009).
50.
PhillipsCabell, “President Urges High-Speed Rails; Cities Jam in East”, New York Times, 5 March 1965.
51.
Securities and Exchange Commission, The Financial Collapse of the Penn Central Company, Staff Report of the SEC to the Senate Special Committee on Investigations (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1972).
52.
ShapiroWalter, “The seven secrets of the Metroliner’s success”, The Washington Monthly, March 1973.
53.
ShimaHideo, “Birth of The Shinkansen—A Memoir”, Japan Railway & Transport Review3 (1994), 45–48.
54.
SiskinPeter, “Growth and its Discontents: Localism, Protest and the Politics of Development on the Postwar Northeast Corridor”, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania (USA), 2002.
55.
StevensWilliam, “Metroliner not yet as fast as a speeding bullet train, but it’s getting there”, New York Times, 3 November 1985.
56.
ThompsonLouis, “The Northeast Corridor Improvement Project”, Eighteenth Henry M. Shaw Lecture in Civil Engineering (RaleighNC: North Caroline State University, 1982).
57.
US Department of Transportation, Northeast Corridor High Speed Rail Passenger Service Improvement Study, Task 3 – Track & Structures Upgrading Standards Development (Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation, 1975).
58.
US Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration, Vision For High-Speed Rail In America (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2009).
59.
US Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration, Northeast Corridor: Achievement and Potential (Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation, 1986).
60.
US Secretary of Transportation, A Prospectus for Change in the Freight Rail Industry (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Transportation, 1978).
61.
US Senate Committee on Commerce, Special Study Group on Transportation Policies in the United States, National Transportation Policy (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1961).
62.
WoodRobert, 1400 Governments: The Political Economy of the New York Metropolitan Region (CambridgeMA: Harvard University Press, 1961).
