Science Teaching in the Middle Grades: Policy Implications for Teacher Education and Systemic Reform

American Association of Advancement of Science. ( 1993). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, DC: Author.

Anderson, J.R. , Reder, L.M. , & Simon, H.A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.

Anderson, R.D. (1992). Perspectives on complexity: An essay on curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 861-876.

Anderson, R.D. (1995). Curriculum reform: Dilemmas and promise. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 33-36.

Arons, A.B. (1990). A guide to introductory physics teaching. New York: John Wiley.

Bowers, C.A. , & Flinders, D.J. (1990). Responsive teaching: An ecological approach to classroom patterns of language, culture, and thought . New York: Teachers College Press .

Brickhouse, N.W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53-62.

Briscoe, C. , & Peters, J. (1997). Teacher collabo, ration across and within schools: Supporting individual changes in elementary science teaching. Science Education, 81(1),51,66.

Cohen, D.K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 24(9), 11-17, 31.

Cohen, D.K. , & Ball, D.L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 331-338.

Corcoran, T. , & Goertz, M. (1995). Instructional capacity and high performance schools . Educational Researcher, 24(9), 27-31.

Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880-1990. New York: Teachers College Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Policy for restructuring. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up (pp. 157-176). New York: Teachers College Press.

Denzin, N.K. , & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N . K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Elmore, R.F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice . Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1-26.

Fullan M.G. (with Stiegelbauer, S. ). (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depth of educational reform. Bristol, PA: Falmer.

Fullan, M. , & Hargreaves, A. (1991). Teacher development and educational change. London: Falmer .

Fullan, M. , & Miles, M. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't . Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 744-752.

Germann, P.J. , Aram, R. , & Burke, G. (1996). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh-grade students to the science process skills of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 79-100.

Grant, S.G. , Peterson, P.L. , & Shojgreen-Downer, A. (1996). Learning to teach mathematics in the context of systemic reform. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 509-541.

Grossman, P.L. , & Stodolsky, S.S. (1994). Consideration of content and the circumstances of secondary school teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 179-222.

Haertel, E.H. (1991). Form and function in assessing science education . In G. Kulm & S. M. Malcolm (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp. 233-246). Washington, DC: AAAS.

Jennings, N.E. (1996). Interpreting policy in real classrooms: Case studies of state reform and teacher practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Kahle, J.B. (1997, March). Reaching equity in systemic reform: How do we assess progress and problems? Paper presented at the meeting of the Strategies for Evaluating Systemic Reform Project, National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison .

Kahle, J.B. (1999, January). Bridging the gap: Equity in systemic reform. Invited address, Performance Effectiveness Review (PER), K-12 Student Assessment Activities, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.

Knapp, M.S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(2), 227-267.

Kulm, G. , & Stussey, C. (1991). Assessment in science and mathematics education reform. In G. Kulm & S. M. Malcolm (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp. 71-88). Washington, DC: AAAS.

Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591-596.

Lincoln, Y.S. , & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Linn, M.C. (1992). Science education reform: Building on the research base. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 821-840.

Manouchehri, A. (1998). Mathematics curriculum reform and teachers: What are the dilemmas? Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 278-286.

McDermott, L. C. (Ed.). (1996). Physics by inquiry. Seattle: University of Washington.

National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Odden, A.R. (1991). The evolution of education policy implementation . In A. R. Odden (Ed.) Educational policy implementation (pp. 11-12). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Page, R. (1995). Who systemizes the systemizers? Policy and practice interactions in a case of state-level systemic reform. Theory into Practice, 34, 21-29.

Peterson, P. , Fennema, E. , Carpenter, T. , & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers' pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics . Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 1-40.

Roychoudhury, A. , & Finley, F.N. (1997). Changing existing practice: Sarah's story. Teaching Education, 8(2), 115-125.

Roychoudhury, A. , & Kahle, J.B. (1995, April). Reforming science teaching: A case study of changes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.

Schaffer, E.C. , Nesselrodt, P.S. , & Stringfield, S.C. (1997). Impediments to reform: An analysis of destabilizing issues in ten promising programs. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.

Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching . Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.

Smylie, M.A. (1994). Redesigning teachers' work: Connections to the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 20, 129-177.

Smylie, M.A. (1996). From bureaucratic control to building human capital: The importance of teacher learning in education reform. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 9-11.

Steffy, B.E. (1993). The Kentucky education reform. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.

Stodolsky, S. , & Grossman, P. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 227-249.

Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, A.G. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conception of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105-107.

Tom, A.R. (1997). Redesigning teacher education. New York: State University of New York Press.

Vesilind, E.M. , & Jones, M.G. (1998). Gardens or graveyards: Science education reform and school culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 35(7), 757-775.

Whitford, B.L. , & Gaus, D.M. (1995). With a little help from their friends: Teachers making change at Wheeler School. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up (pp. 18-43). New York: Teachers College Press.

Yin, R.K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.