Borman, W. (1986). Behavior-based rating scales. In R. Berk (Ed.), Performance assessment (pp. 100-120). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
Bradley, D. E. , & Pursley, R. D. (1987). Behaviorally anchored rating scales for patrol officer performance appraisal: Development and evaluation. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15(1), 37-45.
3.
Champion, C. H. , Green, S. B., & Sauser, W. I., Jr. (1988). Development and evaluation of shortcut-derived behaviorally anchored rating scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 28-41.
4.
Cloud-Silva, C. , & Denton, J. (1989). The development and validation of a low-inference observation instrument to assess instructional performance of teaching candidates. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 24(2), 7-14.
5.
Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Row.
6.
Good, T. L. , Biddle, B. J., & Brophy, J. E. (1975). Teachers make a difference. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7.
Green, S. B. , Sauser, W. I., Fagg, J. M., & Champion, C. H. (1981). Shortcut methods for deriving behaviorally anchored rating scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 761-775.
8.
Hom, P. W. , DeNisi, A. S., Kinicki, A. J., & Bannister, B. D. (1982). Effectiveness of performance feedback from behaviorally anchored rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), 568-576.
9.
Lambert, N. M. , & Hartsough, C. S. (1980). Pupil behavior rating scale [Rating instrument]. In N. M. Lambert, C. S. Hartsough, & E. M. Bower (Eds.), A process for the assessment of effective student functioning (pp. 9-11). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill, Publisher's Test Service.
10.
Mamchur, C. , & Nelson, D. (1984). Predicting teacher effectiveness: A final report on a proper linear regression approach to selection for teacher education in British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 261 092)
11.
McGreal, T. L. (1990). The use of rating scales in teacher evaluation: Concerns and recommendations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(1), 41-58.
12.
Medley, D. , Soar, R., & Coker, H. (1984). The minimum conditions for valid evaluation of teacher performance. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 19(1), 22-27.
13.
Moir, E. (1996). California standards for the teaching profession. Santa Cruz, CA: Santa Cruz County Office of Education.
14.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (1991). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession (2nd ed.: Summary). Detroit, MI: Author.
15.
Powell, J. V. (1986). Observer ratings of preservice teaching performance. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 13(1), 47-50.
16.
Shapira, Z. , & Shirom, A. (1980). New issues in the use of behaviorally anchored rating scales: Level of the analysis, the effects of incident frequency, and external validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(5), 517-523.
17.
Stansbury, K. , & Long, C. (1992, February). Assessment Component of the California New Teacher Project: Framework of Knowledge, Skills and Abilities for Beginning Teachers in California. A Work in Progress. (Available from Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, San Francisco)
18.
Stolworthy, R. L. (1990a). Teacher education: The application of Fisher's LSD matrix in the evaluation of preservice teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 318 771)
19.
Stolworthy, R. L. (1990b). Teaching competencies in preservice teacher education: A study of the analysis of variance in the evaluative efforts. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 283)
20.
Stolworthy, R. L. (1991). Preservice teacher evaluation: An analysis of the variance. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 338 574)
21.
Taylor, J. B. , Haefele, E., Thompson, P., & O' Donoghue, C. (1970). Rating scales as measures of clinical judgment: II. The reliability of example-anchored scales under conditions of rater heterogeneity and divergent behavior sampling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(2), 301-310.
22.
Zedeck, S. , Imparato, N., Krausz, M., & Oleno, T. (1974). Development of behaviorally anchored rating scales as a function of organizational level. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(2), 249-252.
