Amdur, D. (1993). Arts and cultural context: A curriculum integrating discipline-based education with other humanities subjects at the secondary level. Art Education, 46(3), 12-19.
2.
Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616-622.
3.
Bodell, H. (1994). Goals 2000: A national framework for America's schools. Arlington, VA: Education Funding Research Council.
4.
Drake, S. M. (1991). How our team dissolved the boundaries. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 20-22.
5.
Drake, S. M. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
6.
Fogarty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61-65.
7.
Gardner, H. (1991). To open minds. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Hamblen, K. (1995). Beyond the public face of policy making. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(3), 28-33.
9.
Hange, J. , & Rolfe, H. (1995, April). Interdisciplinary curriculum and instruction: Teaming to improve learning and motivation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
10.
Haycock, K. (1996, January/February). Thinking differently about school reform: College and university leadership for the big changes we need. Change, 13-18.
11.
Irwin, R. L. , & Reynolds, J. K. (1995). Integration as a strategy for teaching the arts as disciplines. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(4), 13-19.
12.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13.
Kovalik, S. (1994). ITI: The model. integrated thematic instruction (3rd ed.). (ERIC Document #374894)
14.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Teachers College.
15.
Nelson, K. (1995). Data for the National Education Goals Report. Vol. 1: National Data. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16.
Perlman, C. (1994, April). How will national curriculum standards be assessed at the local level? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
17.
Ravitch, D. (1992). National standards and curriculum reform: A view from the Department of Education. NASSP Bulletin, 76(548), 24-29.
18.
Roucher, N. & Lovano-Kerr, J. (1995). Can the arts maintain integrity in interdisciplinary learning? Arts Education Policy Review, 96(4), 20-25.
19.
Salisbury-Willis, B. (1995). From standards to practice. Stage of the Art, 7(2), 21-23.
20.
Simpson, J. (1996). In search of meaning. Art Education, 28, 31-39.
21.
Smith, R. (1995). The limits and costs of integration in arts education. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(5), 21-25.
22.
Taylor, K. (1994). Letting go of the bike. Teaching Education, 6(2), 71-80.
23.
Witmer, J. (1995a). The keystone integrated framework. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Department of Education.
24.
Witmer, J. (1995b). Keystone integrated framework: Glossary of terms. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Department of Education.
