Ball, D. L. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(1), 40-48.
2.
Ball, D. L. (1991). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about subject matter? In M. M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching Academic Subjects to Diverse Learners (pp. 63-83). New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
Brown, C. A. , & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-239). New York: Macmillan.
4.
Donmoyer, R. (1987). Why case studies? Reflections on Hord and Hall's three images. Curriculum Inquiry, 17, 91-102.
5.
Doyle, W. , & Ponder, G. A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Inter- change, 8(3), 1-12.
6.
Duffy, G. , & Roehler, L. (1986). Constraints on teacher change. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1),55-58.
7.
Fennema, E. , & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.
8.
Fullan, M. , & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 1-9). London: Falmer.
9.
Hord, S. M. , Rutherford, W. L., Huling-Austin, L., & Hall, G. E. (1987). Taking charge of change. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10.
Lappan, G. , & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (1993). Knowing and doing mathematics: A new vision for middle grades students. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 625-637.
11.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129-151.
12.
Mathematical Association of America (1991). A call for change: Recommendations for the mathematical preparation of teachers of mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
13.
McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 171-178.
14.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
15.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
16.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1993). Assessment standards for school mathematics (draft). Reston, VA: Author.
17.
Noss, R. , & Hoyles, C. (1993). Bob-A suitable case for treatment?Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25, 201-218.
18.
Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Re- searcher, 19(7), 10-18.
19.
Rogus, Joseph F. (1988). Teacher leader programming: Theoretical underpinnings. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 46-52.
20.
Sikes, P. J. (1992). Imposed change and the experienced teacher. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 36-55). London: Falmer.
21.
Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105-127.
22.
Tobin, K. (1987). Forces which shape the implemented curriculum in high school science and mathematics. Teaching & Teacher Education, 3(4), 287-298.
23.
Wood, T. , Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 587-616.