Baldwin, A. (1990) Ethnic and cultural issues. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 416 - 427). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
Borg, W. (1981). Applying educational research. New York: Longman.
3.
Bredekamp, S. (Ed.) (1987). Developmentally appropriate practices and programs in early child- hood. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
4.
Bredekamp, S. , & Rosegrant, T. (Eds.) (1992). Reading potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children. Vol. 1. Washing- ton, DC: NAEYC.
5.
Bredekamp, S. , & Shepard, L. (1989). How best to protect children from inappropriate school expectations, practices and policies. Young Children, 44(3), 14-24.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, (6), 187-249.
7.
Chittenden, E. (1991). Authentic assessment, evaluation, and documentation of student performance. In V. Perrone (Ed.), Expanding student assessment (pp. 21 - 33). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
8.
Frasier, M. (1991, Spring). Disadvantaged and culturally diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(3), 234 - 245.
9.
Gardner, H. (1991, Spring). Meeting on new thinking on identification of high-ability disadvantaged students: Theory and practice.Transcripts of proceedings. Meeting of the Jacob Javits Grant, U.S. Department of Education.
10.
Kames, M. , & Johnson, L. (1986). Identification and assessment of gifted/talented non-handicapped children in early childhood. In J. Whitmore (Ed.), Intellectual giftedness in young children (pp. 35-54). New York: Haworth Press.
11.
Katz, L. , & Chard, S. (1990). Engaging children's minds. New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Kitano, M. (1986). Evaluating program options for young gifted children. In J. Whitmore (Ed.), Intellectual giftedness in young children (pp. 89-109). New York: Haworth Press.
13.
Merriam, S. B. (1991). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
National Association for the Education of Young Children . (1991, March). Guidelines for appropriate curriculum content and assessment in programs serving children ages 3 through 8. Young Children, 46(3), 21-38.
15.
Patton, M. W. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
16.
Paulson, F. L. , & Paulson, P. R. (1990, August). How do portfolios measure up? Paper presented at the meeting of the Northwest Evaluation Association. Union, WA.
17.
Perrone, V. (Ed.) (1991) Expanding student assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18.
Richert, S. , Alvino, J., & McConnell, M. (1982). National report on identification. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.
19.
Roedell, W. , Jackson, N., & Robinson, H. (1980). Young gifted children. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
Rubenfeld, J. (1991). Meeting on new thinking on identification of high-ability disadvantaged students: Theory and practice.Transcripts of proceedings. Meeting of the Jacob Javits Grant, U.S. Department of Education.
21.
Seidman, I. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
Seidel, J. , Kjoseth, R., & Seymour, K. (1988). The Ethnograph (computer software.) Corvallis, OR: Qualis Research Associates.
23.
Shaklee, B. (1992). Identification of young gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15(2), 134-144.
24.
Shaklee, B. , Barbour, N., & Viechnicki, K. (in press). A portfolio approach based on qualitative research principles: The Early Assessment for Exceptional Potential Model.
25.
Shaklee, B. , Barbour, N., Ambrose, R., & Rohrer, J. (1992). Early assessment for exceptional potential in young minority and/or economically disadvantaged students. In Contexts for promise: Noteworthy practices in the identification of gifted students. Charlottesville, VA: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
26.
Shaklee, B. , Barbour, N., Whitmore, J., Ambrose, R., & Viechnicki, K. (1990). Early assessment for exceptional potential in young minority and/or economically disadvantaged students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
27.
Shaklee, B. , & Rohrer, J. (1992). Early assessment of exceptional potential. Illinois Council of the Gifted Journal, 22-24.
28.
Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
29.
Viechnicki, K. (1991, February). Evaluation report, Early Assessment for Exceptional Potential Project. Unpublished manuscript. Kent State University, Kent. OH.
30.
Viechnicki, K. (1992, March). Evaluation report, Early Assessment for Exceptional Potential Project. Unpublished manuscript. Kent State University, Kent, OH.
31.
Zessoules, R. , & Gardner, H. (1991). Authentic assessment: Beyond the buzzword & into the classroom. In V. Perrone (Ed.). Expanding student assessment (pp. 47-71). Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
