Making Subject Matter Part of the Conversation in Learning to Teach

Abstract

Conversations between four mentor and four novice teachers were analyzed to discover how they discussed issues about the teaching and learning of content. The four cases were drawn from a larger set of conversations that were part of the data gathered in a study of two different first- year teacher programs—an induction program and an alternative certification program. Analy sis of the conversations revealed a range of ways that mentors dealt with novices' understanding of subject matter, including presenting subject matter directly, indirectly, assuming adequate subject-matter knowledge, and ignoring it. The conversations are discussed in relation to four aspects of learning to teach academic content: (a) deepening one's understanding of subject matter, (b) learning to think about academic content from the students' perspective, (c) learning to represent subject matter in appropriate and engaging ways, and (d) learning to organize students for teaching and learning academic content.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ball, D. (1988). The subject matter preparation of prospective mathematics teachers: Challenging the myths. Researcher Report 88-3. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teaching.

Calkins, L.M. , & Harwayne, S. (1987). The Writing Workshop: A world of difference. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Carter, K. , & Richardson, V. (1989). A curriculum for an initial-year-of-teaching program. Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 405-421.

Copeland, R.W. (1984). How do children learn mathematics: Teaching implications of Piaget's research. (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Dewey, J. (1965). The relation of theory and practice in education . In M. Borrowman (Ed.), Teacher education in America: A documentary history (pp. 1-30). New York: Teachers College Press. (Original work published 1904)

Doyle, W. (1986). Content representations in teachers' definitions of academic work. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(4), 365-379.

Feiman-Nemser, S. , & Buchmann, M. (1987). When is student teaching teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 255-273.

Feiman-Nemser, S. , Parker, M. , & Zeichner, K. (1990, April). Are mentor teachers teacher educators? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.

Graves, D.H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

10.

Hawkins, D. (1974). The informed vision: Essays on learning and human nature (pp. 48-62). New York: Agathon Press.

11.

Huling-Austin, L. (1989). Research on beginning teacher assistance programs . In L. Huling-Austin , S. J. Odell , P. Ishler , R. S. Kay , & R. A. Edelfelt (Eds.), Assisting the beginning teacher (pp. 39-55). Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.

12.

Huling-Austin, L. , & Murphy, S.C. (1987, April). Assessing the impact of teacher induction programs : Implication for program development. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association , Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 283 779)

13.

McDiarmid, G.W. (1989). What do prospective teachers learn in their liberal arts courses. Research Report 89-8. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research in Teacher Education .

14.

McDiarmid, G.W. , Ball, D.L. , & Anderson, C. (1989). Why staying ahead one chapter just won't work: Subject-specific pedagogy. In M. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for beginning teachers (pp. 193-205). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.

15.

Odell, S. (1989). Developing support programs for beginning teachers . In L. Huling-Austin , S. J. Odell , P. Ishler , R. S. Kay , & R. A. Edelfelt (Eds.), Assisting the beginning teacher (pp. 19-38). Reston, VA: Association of Teacher Educators.

16.

Schram, P. , Feiman-Nemser, S. , & Ball, D. (1989). Thinking about teaching subtractions with regrouping: A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers' responses to textbooks. Research Report 89-5. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research in Teacher Education .

17.

Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching . Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

18.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.

19.

Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143-178.

20.

Wilson, S.M. , Shulman, L.S. , & Richert, A.E. (1987). "150 different ways" of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104-124). London: Cassell.