Field experiences are rarely designed to challenge prospective teachers' underlying beliefs about teaching and learning. In the experience described here, teacher education students are deliber ately brought face-to-face with their assumptions through encounters with negative numbers, third-graders, and an unconventional teacher. Although the students appear to reconsider their beliefs, such changes may be superficial and short-lived.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ball, D.L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
2.
Ball, D.L. (1989). Breaking with experience in learning to teach mathematics: The role of the preservice methods course (Issue Paper 89-10) . East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
3.
Ball, D.L., & McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). The subject matter preparation of teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 437-449). New York: Macmillan.
4.
Boyer, E. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America . New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Brousseau, B., & Freeman, D. (1988). How do teacher education faculty members define desirable teacher beliefs? Teaching and Teacher Education , 4(3), 267-273.
6.
Brousseau, B., Freeman, D., & Book, C. (1984). Comparing educational beliefs of teacher candidates and their non-teaching counterparts (Program Evaluation Series No. 3). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, College of Education, Office of Program Evaluation.
7.
Buchmann, M. (1987). Teacher knowledge: The lights that teachers live by. Oxford Review of Education, 13, 151-164.
8.
Cohen, D.K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus ca change... (Issue Paper 88-3). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
9.
Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1980New York: Longman.
10.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1986). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation . In J. D. Raths & L. G. Katz (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 61-73). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
Feiman-Nemser, S., McDiarmid, G.W., Melnick, S., & Parker, M. (In press). Changing beginning teachers' conceptions: A study of an introductory teacher education course. Journal for the Education of Teachers.
12.
Fotiu, R., Freeman, D., & West, B. (1985). Undergraduate follow-up study, Spring, 1985 (Program Evaluation Series No. 11). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, College of Education, Office of Program Evaluation .
13.
Freeman, D.J., & Kalaian, H.A. (1989). Profiles of students completing teacher education programs at M.S.U. : Fall, 1986 through Spring, 1988 (Program Evaluation Series No. 25). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, College of Education, Office of Program Evaluation.
14.
Gomez, M.L. (1988, April), Prospective teachers' beliefs about good writing: What do they bring with them to teacher education? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
15.
Jackson, P. (1986). The practice of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
Katz, L., Raths, J., Mohanty, C., Kurachi, A., & Irving, J. (1981). Follow-up studies: Are they worth doing? Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 18-24.
17.
Kline, M. (1977). Why the professor can't teach: Mathematics and the dilemma of university education. New York: St. Martin's Press.
18.
Kohl, H. (1984). Growing minds: On becoming a teacher. New York: Harper & Row.
19.
Lortie, D.C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago.
20.
McDiarmid, G.W. (1989, October). What's the matter? Preparing teachers for culturally diverse classrooms. Paper presented at the fall meeting of the Far West Region Holmes Group, Reno, NV.
21.
McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). The liberal arts: Will more mean better subject matter understanding? Theory into Practice, 29, 21-29.
22.
McDiarmid, G.W., Ball, D., & Anderson, C. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn't really work: Subject-specific pedagogy. In M. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 193-205). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
23.
McDiarmid, G.W., & Price, J. (1990). Prospective teachers' views of diverse learners: A study of the participants in the ABCD project. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
24.
Neufeld, B. (1988, April). Why do I have to learn that? Prospective teachers' ideas about the importance of the subjects they will teach. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
25.
Paine, L. (1989). Orientations towards diversity: What do prospective teachers bring? (Research Report 89-9). East Lansing, MI : Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
26.
Schram, P., Wilcox, S., Lanier, P., Lappan, G., & Even, R. (1988, April). Changing mathematical conceptions of preservice teachers: A content and pedagogical intervention. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New Orleans.
27.
Schwab, J.J. (1976). Education and the state: Learning community. In R. M. Hutchins & M. J. Adler (Eds.), Great ideas today (pp. 234-271). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
28.
Tolkien, J.R.R. (1965). The lord of the rings: Vol 2. The two towersNew York: Ballantine.
29.
Waxman, H.C., & Walberg, H.J. (1986). Effects of early field experiences. In J. Raths & L. Katz (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 165-184). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30.
Webb, C. (1981). Theoretical and empirical bases for early field experiences in teacher education. In C. Webb , N. Gehrke, P. Ishler, & A. Mendoza (Eds.), Exploratory field experiences in teacher education (pp. 12-37). Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 205 482)
