How do teacher education deans know they have minimally adequate resources to provide quality progams? Howcan com parisons of program resources be made, and what are the key variables to compare? Peseau and Tudor address these ques tions and suggest cluster analysis as a technique for use in preparing a rationale for obtaining a fair share of a university's resources. Teacher education deans, suggest the authors, could evaluate the pairings of the programs within their cluster, and with programs in other clusters.
Allen, R. A., & Topping, J. R. (Eds). (1979). Cost information & formula funding: New approaches. Boulder, CO : National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
3.
Anderson, R.H. (1980). Financing of teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 2(3), 31-38.
4.
Astin, A.A., & Solmon, L.C. (1981). Are reputational ratings needed to measure quality ? Change, 13(7), 14-19.
5.
Balderston, F. (1970). Thinking about the outputs of higher education . In B. Lawrence, G. Weathersby, & V Patterson (Eds). Outputs of higher education: Their identification, measurement, and evaluation (11-16). Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education.
6.
Berliner, D.C. (1984). Making the right changes in preservice teacher education. Phi Delta Kappan, 66(2), 94-96.
7.
Blau, P.M., & Marguiles, R.Z. (1974-1975, Winter). The reputation of American professional schools. Change, 6(10), 42-47.
8.
Bloom, A.M. (1983). Differential instructional productivity indices . Research in Higher Education, 18(2), 179-193.
9.
Bowen, H.R. (1981). The costs of higher education: How much do colleges and universities spend and how much should they spend? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Brinkman, P.T. & Teeter, D.J. (1987). Methods for selecting comparison groups. In P. T. Brinkman (Ed.), Conducting inter-institutional comparisons (5-23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Cartter, A.M. (1966). An assessment of quality in graduate education . Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
12.
Caulley, D.N. & Dawson, J.A. (1980). Quantitative versus qualitative program evaluation . In L. Rubin (Ed.), Critical issues in educational policy: An administrator's overview (354-362). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Coleman, D.R., & Boltz, J.R. (1977). A theoretical approach to the internal allocation of academic personnel resources. In R. H. Fenske (ED.), Conflicting pressures in postsecondary education (pp. 193-198). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research .
14.
Denton, J.J., & Smith, N.L. (1983). Alternative teacher preparation programs: Cost-effectiveness comparison. (Paper and report series #86). Portland, OR : Northwest Regional Education Laboratory. (ERIC ED 237 569)
15.
Dressel, P., & Simon, L.A.K. (1976). Allocating resources among departments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Elsass, J.E. & Lingenfelter, P.E. (1980). An identification of college and university peer groups. In Douglas Collier (Ed.), Innovations in higher education management: Coping with the 80's (pp. 89-106). Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
17.
Elton, C.F., & Rose, H.A. (1972). What are the raters rating? American Psychologist, 27, 197-201.
18.
Feldman, M.E., & Fisher, R.L. ( 1983, February). The role of cluster analysis in comparing teacher education programs among similar institutions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Houston, TX.
19.
Fretter, W. (1977, February). The Cartter report on the leading schools of education, law, and business. Change, 9(2), 44-48.
20.
Gifford, B.R., & Stoddart, T. (1985). Teacher education: Rhetoric or real reform? In R. Johnston (Ed.), Education on trial (pp. 177-197). San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
21.
Hemp, G., & Brunson, J. (1984). 1982-83 Planning factors in engineering education national study. A study for the American Society for Engineering Education . Tallahassee, FL: University of Florida.
22.
Kim, J., & Mueller, C.W. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to use it. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.
23.
Kluender, M.M. (1984). Teacher education programs in the 1980s: Some selected characteristics. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 33-35.
24.
Lane, F.S., Lawrence, J.S., & Mertins, H., Jr. (1987). University financial analysis using interinstitutional data. In P. T. Brinkman (Ed.), Conducting interinstitutional comparisons (pp. 83-101). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Lanier, J.E., & Little, J.W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M. C. Wittrock, (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 527-659). New York: Macmillan.
26.
MacPhail-Wilcox, B. ( 1982, Spring). An analysis of investment in teacher education: The Texas case. 1978-79. Journal of Educational Finance, 7, 462-472.
27.
McCoy, M., & Fincher, A.L. (1977). Analysis of state financial support of higher education: Pitfalls and promises. In R. H. Fenske (Ed.), Conflicting pressures in postsecondary education (pp. 159-164). Los Angeles: The Association for Institutional Research .
28.
Noe, R.E. (1986, Winter). Formula funding in higher education: A review. Journal of Education Finance, 11, 363-376.
29.
Orr, P.G., & Peseau, B.A. (1979). Formula funding is not the problem in teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 56(1), 61-72.
30.
Orwig, M.D., & Jones, D.P. (1978). Why not "indicators" for postsecondary education ? In R. H. Fenske & P. J. Statskey (Eds.). Proceedings of the 17th Association for Institutional Research Forum. Research and Planning for Higher Education (pp. 131-133). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research. (ERIC ED 156 035)
31.
Peseau, B.A. (1984). Resources allocated to teacher education in state universities and land-grant colleges. (A report prepared for the National Commisison on Excellence in Teacher Education). University, AL : American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education . (ERIC ED 250 297)
32.
Peseau, B.A. (1986). Funding and academic production of teacher education in state universities and land grant colleges. (8th Annual Study). University, AL: Association of Colleges & Schools of Education in State Universities & Land-Grant Colleges. (ERIC ED 272 489)
33.
Peseau, B.A. (1988). Funding of teacher education in state universities . In K. Alexander (Ed.), American Education Finance Association Yearbook (pp. 179-208). New York: Ballinger.
34.
Peseau, B.A., & Orr, P.G. (1980). The outrageous under-funding of teacher education . Phi Delta Kappan, 62(2), 100-102.
35.
Roose, K.D., & Anderson, C.J. ( 1970). A rating of graduate programs . Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
36.
Terenzini, P.T., Hartmark, L. , Lorang, W.G., & Shirley, R.C. (1980). A conceptual and methodological approach to the identification of peer institutions. Research in Higher Education , 12(4), 621-636.
37.
Tudor, R.L. (1988). A typology of teacher education programs in state universities and land-grant colleges based on resource and production variables: A cluster analysis approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University ofAlabama.
38.
Vaizey, J. (1970). The outputs of higher education — Their proxies, measurement, and evaluation. In B. Lawrence, G. Weathersby, & V Patterson (Eds.), Outputs of higher education: Their identification, measurement, and use (pp. 19-38). Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education .
39.
Walker, D. (1986, June). Rankings of British universities to serve as a basis for calculating government aid. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 32(1), 32-33.
40.
Webster, D.S. (1981). Advantages and disadvantages of methods of assessing qualityChange, 13(7), 20-24.
41.
Webster, D.S. (1985). Institutional effectiveness using scholarly peer assessments as major criteria. The Review of Higher Education , 9(1), 67-82.
42.
Whitely, M.A. & Stage, E.K. (1987). Institutional uses of comparative data. In P. T. Brinkman (Ed.), Conducting interinstitutional comparisons (pp. 59-71). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
