Bullough describes the efforts of a small group of teacher educators to develop a program emphasizing reflectivity. To make reflectivity meaningful and useful for program development purposes, it must be grounded in a conceptual framework. In the quest to produce such a framework four questions were iden tified by the faculty. Each question is ad dressed in the article. Significant lessons learned about the program develop ment process are shared.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berliner, D. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Research, 15, 5-13.
2.
Berliner, D. (1987). Ways of thinking about students and classrooms by more and less experienced teachers. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers thinking (pp. 60-83). London: Cassell Educational Limited.
3.
Berliner, D. (1988 February). The development of expertise in pedagogy . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans.
4.
Bode, B. (1937). Democracy as a way of life. New York: Macmillan.
5.
Bullough, R. (1987). Planning and the first year of teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 13 (3), 231-250.
6.
Bullough, R. (1989). First year teacher: A case study. New York; Teachers College Press.
7.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer Press.
8.
Crow, N. (1987). Socialization within a teacher education program: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
9.
Cruickshank, D. (1981). Reflective teaching. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
10.
Departmet of Educational Studies. (1985). A guide to the secondary and middle school education programs. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1985). Valuing teachers: The making of a profession. Teachers College Record, 87. 205-218.
12.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
13.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston : D.C. Heath.
14.
Gitlin, A. (1981). Horizontal evaluation : An approach to student teacher supervision. Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 47-50.
15.
Hodges, C. (1982). Implementing methods: If you can't blame the cooperating teacher, whom can you blame? Journal of Teacher Education , 33, 25-29.
16.
Holmes Group, (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group . East Lansing, MI: Author.
17.
Howey, K., & Zimpher, N. (1986). New curriculum directions in the education of teachers. Curriculum and Teaching, 1, 93-102.
18.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
19.
Rogus, J. (1988). Teacher leader programming : Theoretical underpinnings . Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (1), 46-52.
20.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1-22.
23.
Tom, A. ( 1983). Inquiry into inquiry-oriented teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (5), 35-44.
24.
Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical . Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205-228.
25.
Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54 (2), 143-178.
26.
Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 23-48.
27.
Zimpher, N. (1988). A design for the professional development of teacher leaders. Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (1), 53-60.
