Success in studentteaching is not neces sarily followed by success in regular teaching. Beginning teachers face a vari ety of difficult problems and many leave the profession after a short period of time. Frye suggests several ways in which school principals can ease the transition from preservice to inservice teaching.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Academic Affairs Conference of Midwestern Universities and the Chicago Consortium of Colleges and Universities. (1974). Holding conferences with student teachers: Suggestions for planning, conducting, evaluating. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 249 179)
2.
Adams, R.D. (1982). Teacher development : A look at changes in teacher perceptions and behavior across time. Journal of Teacher Education , 31 (4), 40-43.
3.
Alessia, M., & Owens, K. (1983). Handbook for the student teaching semester. Romeoville, IL: Lewisville University, Dept. of Education . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 235 122)
4.
Applegate, J.H. (1987). Teacher candidate selection: An overview. Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (2), 2-6.
5.
Armstrong, D.G. (1984, February). New teachers: Why do they leave and how can principals retain them? NASSP Bulletin, 68, 110-117.
6.
Balch, P.M., & Balch, P.E. (1987). The cooperating teacher — A practical approach for the supervision of student teachers. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
7.
Broadbelt, S., & Wall, R.E. (1985, February). Student-teacher socialization: Role model influences. Paper presented at Eastern Educational Research Association Conference, Virginia Beach, VA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 264 225)
8.
Campbell, L.P., & Williamson, J.A. (1983, October). Supervising the student teacher: What is really involved? NASSP Bulletin, 67, 77-79.
9.
Copeland, W.D. (1979). Student teachers and cooperating teachers: An ecological relationship. Theory into Practice, 18, 194-199.
10.
Corcoran, E. (1982). Classroom contexts as settings for learning to teach: A new direction for research in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 4, 52-55.
11.
Davis, B.K. (1982, April). Field experience : What is it? Why is it out there? Unpublished manuscript, The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 222 447)
12.
Doxey, I. (1987). The field practice experience. Teacher Education, 30, 16-29.
13.
Flippo, R.F. (1986). Teacher certification testing: Perspectives and issues. Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (2), 2-9.
14.
Fox, S.M., & Singletary, T.J. (1986). Deductions about supportive induction. Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (1), 12-15.
15.
Funk, E.F., Long, B., Keithley, A.M., & Hoffman, J.L. (1982). The cooperating teacher as most significant other: A competent humanist. Action in Teacher Education, 4, 57-64.
16.
Good, T.L. , & Brophy, J.E. (1987). Looking in classrooms (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
17.
Huling-Austin, L. (1986). What can and cannot reasonably be expected from teacher induction programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (1), 2-5.
18.
Johnson, W.D., Cox, C.B., & Wood, G. (1982). Communication patterns and topics of single and paired student teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 4, 56-60.
19.
Kounin, J.S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20.
Kurtz, W.H. (1983, January). How the principal can help beginning teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 67, 42-45.
21.
Lasley, T.J. (1981, January). Helping teachers who have problems with discipline - a model and instrument. NASSP Bulletin, 65, 6-15.
22.
Lasley, T.J. (In press). A teacher development model for classroom management. Educational Leadership.
23.
Liebert, D.K. (1985). From student to teacher. A handbook for student teaching. Practicum guidelines for student teachers, master teachers, administrators, college supervisors. Spokane, WA: Whitworth College. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 263 062)
24.
Marso, R.N., & Pigge, F.L. (1987). Differences between self-perceived job expectations and job realities of beginning teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (6), 53-56.
25.
Morris, J.E., Hawk, J.D., & Drake, E. (1981-1982). Most frequently used methods and criteria for identifying, selecting, and continuing supervising teachers . The Teacher Educator, 17, 15.
26.
Odell, S.J. (1986). Induction support of new teachers: A functional approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (1), 26-29.
27.
Reinhartz, J., & Beach, D.M. (1982, October). The principal: A vital component in assessing teacher education programs. NASSP Bulletin, 66, 68-70.
28.
Samford University. (1982). Field experience guidelines for university students and faculty and public school teachers and administrators. Birmingham, AL: Samford University, School of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 235 118)
29.
Sweeney, J., & Manatt, D. (1984). A team approach to supervising the marginal teacher . Educational Leadership, 41, 25-27.
