The University of Virginia program focuses on creating a reasonable blend of the available empirical research on teaching and the knowledge that comes from other sources such as the wisdom of practice. The authors describe how new methodological and technological developments are used to enhance the pedagogical knowledge and skills of pre service teachers. Of particular interest is howthe UVa preservice curriculum inter faces with the curricular focus of the Virginia Beginning Teacher Assistance Program.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, L.M., Evertson, C.M., & Brophy, J.E. (1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groupsElementary School Journal , 7, 193-222.
2.
Bolster, A.S., Jr. (1983). Toward a more effective model of research on teachingHarvard Educational Review, 53 (3), 294-308.
3.
Brophy, J.E., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
4.
Chronister, A., & McNergney, R. (1986, February). Programming a simulation of teacher planningPaper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Miami, FL.
5.
Clark, M.C., & Yinger, R.J. (1979). Teachers' thinking In P. Peterson & H. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching : Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 231-262). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
6.
Cohen, S.B., & Hearn, D. (1985). Reinforcement In R. McNergney (Ed.), Assisting the beginning teacher (pp. 29-62). Richmond, VA : Virginia Department of Education.
7.
Cooper, J.M. (1986). The cooperating teacher: A new role-definition Unpublished manuscript, Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
8.
Dewey, J. (1986). Pedagogy as university disciplineUniversity Record, 1, (25-26), 353-355, 361-363. (Original work published 1929.)
9.
Fenstermacher, G.D. (1980). A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of research in education, Vol. 1 (pp. 157-185). Itasca, IL: E E. Peacock.
10.
Gage, N.L. (1978). The scientific basis of the art of teachingNew York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Gage, N.L. (1986, April). Do process-product researchers advocate non-deliberation in the classmom?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
12.
Gage, N.L. , & Winne, P.E. (1975). Performance-based teacher education In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education (Seventy-fourth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 146-172). Chicago: University of Chicago.
13.
Gideonse, H.D. (1986). Guiding images for teaching and teacher education In T. J. Lasley (Ed.), The dynamics of change in teacher education (pp. 187- 197). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
14.
Gliessman, D.H. (1981). Learning how to teach: Processes, effects, and criteriaWashington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 200 516)
15.
Good, T.L. , & Grouws, D.A. (1979). The Missouri mathematics effectiveness project: An experimental study in fourth grade classroomsJournal of Educational Psychology, 71, 355-362.
16.
Jackson, P.W. (1966). The way teaching isWashington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
17.
Loper, A.B., & Strang, H.R. (1982, April). Computers as laboratory apparatus to examine teacher-student interactional behaviorPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
18.
Loper, A.B., Strang, H.R., Richards, F.E., & Badt, K. (1985). Use of a microcomputer-based simulation to enrich teacher trainingEducational Technology , 25 (12), 36-37.
19.
Loper, A.B., Strang, H.R., Richards, F.E., & Reeve, P.T. (1984, April). Microcomputer-based simulation for teacher trainingPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
20.
McNergney, R.F., Medley, D.M., Aylesworth, M., & Innes, A. (1983). Assessing teachers' planning abilitiesJournal of Educational Research, 77 (2), 108-111.
21.
Medley, D.M. (1982). Teacher competency testing and the teacher educatorWashington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators; and Charlottesville, VA: Bureau of Educational Research .
22.
Mintz, S.L. , McNergney, R.F., Lloyd, J.W., & Moore, J.R. (1986, August). Observation training manual. Paper prepared for a teacher education development-demonstration project funded by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) of the United States Department of EducationCharlottesville: University of Virginia, Curry School of Education.
23.
Morine-Dershimer, G. (1979). Teacher plans and classroom reality: The South Bay study, part IV (Research series no. 60)East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Institute for Research on Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 191796)
24.
Rubin, L. ( 1985). Artistry in teachingNew York: Random House.
25.
Rubin, L. (1981). The artist teacherJournal of Education, 163 (2), 135-143.
26.
Schein, E.H. (1972). Professional education : Some new directionsNew York: McGraw Hill.
27.
Shavelson, R.J. (1976). Teachers' decision making In N. L. Gage (Ed.), The psychology of teaching methods (Seventy-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 372-414). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Showers, B. (1985, April). Coaching: A training component for facilitating transfer of trainingPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
29.
Shulman, L.S., & Elstein, A.S. ( 1975). Studies of problem solving, judgment, and decision making: Implications for education research. In F. N. Kerlinger (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 3-43). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
30.
Strang, H.R., Badt, K.S., & Kauffman, J.M. (1987). Microcomputer-based simulations for training fundamental teaching skillsJournal of Teacher Education, 38 (1), 20-27.
31.
Strang, H.R., & Loper, A.B. (1983a). Microcomputer-based simulation: An aid in training elementary teachersEducational Technology , 23, 30-31.
32.
Strang, H.R., & Loper, A.B. ( 1983b). A microcomputer-based simulation of classroom interactionJournal of Educational Technology Systems , 12, 209-219.
33.
Strang, H.R., Badt, K.S., Loper, A.B., & Richards, R.E. ( 1985, August). A microcomputer-based simulation to control teacher pacing behaviorPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
34.
Thomas, L. (1974). The lives of a cellNew York : Viking.
35.
Zahorik, J. (1975). Teachers' planning modelsEducational Leadership, 33 , 134-139.
